[4 + 1] Annulation of in situ generated azoalkenes with amines: A powerful approach to access 1-substituted 1, 2, 3-triazoles

Hongwei Wang Yongquan Ning Paramasivam Sivaguru Giuseppe Zanoni Xihe Bi

Citation:  Hongwei Wang, Yongquan Ning, Paramasivam Sivaguru, Giuseppe Zanoni, Xihe Bi. [4 + 1] Annulation of in situ generated azoalkenes with amines: A powerful approach to access 1-substituted 1, 2, 3-triazoles[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022, 33(3): 1550-1554. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.09.008 shu

[4 + 1] Annulation of in situ generated azoalkenes with amines: A powerful approach to access 1-substituted 1, 2, 3-triazoles

English

  • 1-Substituted-1, 2, 3-triazoles represent an important five-membered aza-heterocycles, widely present in bioactive compounds and clinical pharmaceuticals (Fig. 1A) [1-5]. As a result, these aza-heterocycles have gained the attention as attractive synthetic targets for the development of new chemical reactions. In 1910, Dimroth and Fester first reported the synthesis of 1-phenyl-1, 2, 3-triazoles by heating phenyl azide with acetylene-saturated acetone in a sealed pipe [6]. Since then, several analogous reactions have emerged using various acetylene derivatives [7-9], such as acetylides [10-20] and vinyl derivatives [21-25]. While these works stand out as pioneering efforts, wide applications of these methods are hindered by drawbacks, such as requiring high pressure and specialized apparatus to handle potentially dangerous acetylene gas [26], toxic and explosive azides [27, 28], high temperatures, narrow substrate scope and unsatisfactory yields [625]. Therefore, the development of a reliable and practical method for the synthesis of 1-substituted 1, 2, 3-triazoles is quite appealing.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Inspiration towards the synthesis of 1-substituted 1, 2, 3-triazoles. (A) Examples of bioactive molecules containing 1-substituted 1, 2, 3-triazole moiety. (B) Different reactivity modes of DFHZ-Tfs. (C) This work: DFHZ as an azoalkence equivalent in the [4 + 1] annulation with primary amines.

    In this context, the [4 + 1] annulation of N-sulfonylhydrazones with primary amines (which are readily-available building blocks) [29-32] provides an efficient entry to access various substituted 1, 2, 3-triazoles [33-43]. Nevertheless, high temperature and strong basic or acidic conditions [44] of the process limit the substrate scope and functional group tolerance, including the late-stage functionalization of complex bioactive molecules [3344]. In the framework of our continuous interest in the preparation and applications of fluoroalkyl N-sulfonylhydrazones [45-49], we have recently discovered difluoroacetaldehyde N-triftosylhydrazones (DFHZ-Tfs) as an operationally simple and bench-stable difluoroalkyl diazo surrogate in carbene transfer reactions. Notably, we observed that DFHZ-Tfs could undergo base-mediated defluorination into diazoacetaldehyde (CHOCHN2) under aqueous conditions (Fig. 1B) [50]. Intrigued by this finding, we envisioned that the introduction of a reactive nucleophile in the base-mediated reaction of difluoroacetaldehyde N-tosylhydrazones (DFHZ-Ts) would achieve a similar type of C-F bond activation, leading to the discovery of a new reactivity mode of DFHZ-Ts as masked azoalkene equivalent in [4 + 1] annulation with primary amines. Herein, we disclose the successful introduction of this strategy and present a convenient method for the synthesis of 1-substituted 1, 2, 3-triazoles via [4 + 1] annulation of in situ generated azoalkene from DFHZ-Ts with primary amines (Fig. 1C). In contrast to earlier reports, this [4 + 1] annulation process eliminates the need for potentially dangerous acetylene gases and specialized apparatus, azides, and high pressure and temperatures [644]. This mild protocol proved to be amenable to a broad range of alkyl and aryl primary amines with different functionalities and scale-up. The method was also successfully applied to the late-stage functionalization of complex bioactive molecules and clinical drugs.

    We initiated our studies by exploring the reaction conditions for the model reaction of n-octylamine (1) and DFHZ-Ts (2a). The initial reaction with the use of DBU as a base in toluene at 40 ℃ afforded the corresponding product 3 in 67% yield (Table 1). Of all bases screened (e.g., DIPEA, Et3N, NaOH, CsOH, KOH, and NaH), NaH was found to be the optimal base, giving 3 in 94% yield (entries 1-5 vs. 6). A brief survey of reaction media showed that ethyl acetate was the best solvent, which gave 3 in 97% yield. Other solvents, such as THF, 1, 4-dioxane, DMSO and DMF, produced the desired product 3 in lower yields (entries 7-10 vs. 11). The product yield was significantly reduced when conducting the reactions at elevated temperatures due to the competitive diazo coupling of DFHZ-Ts (entries 12 and 13). However, reactions with other N-sulfonylhydrazones 2b and 2c led to poor yields (entries 14, 15).

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Optimization of reaction conditions.a
    DownLoad: CSV

    With the optimized conditions in hand, the generality of the method was investigated (Scheme 1). We found that the method is suitable for diverse aliphatic amines, such as linear (n-octyl, n-butyl), branched (isopropyl, tert-butyl), and cyclic amines (cyclopropyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, cyclooctyl, 2-aminotetralin), affording desired 1, 2, 3-triazoles (311) in 73%–97% yield. Additionally, benzylic, heterobenzylic, and homobenzylic amines, even bearing an α-branching, could also be employed for annulation reaction to form corresponding products (1218) in 85%–97% yield. α-Branched amines are the core structures of many approved pharmaceuticals [51, 52]. Converting them into triazoles might enhance their bioactivity. Notably, aliphatic amines with multiple functionalities, including cyclopropyl, tetrahydropyranyl, pyrrolidinyl, morpholinyl, chloro, azido, difluoromethyl, hydroxyl, ether, thioether, acid, ester and amides at the terminus of the alkyl chain remained intact, providing the desired products (1932) in 61%–97% yields. Likewise, alkene-, and alkyne-containing amines could also be tolerated in the transformation with high yields (3336, 85%–95%), demonstrating the synthetic advantages of this method. To our gratification, optically active chiral amine, amino alcohols and amino ester were reacted smoothly to afford the corresponding triazoles (3741) in excellent yield without loss of optical purity [53-55]. These kinds of α-N-chiral triazoles are difficult to synthesize via a traditional alkyne–azide cycloaddition process [56-58]. This method can also be used to build di- and trimeric 1, 2, 3-triazole products. As shown in Scheme 2B, meso-1, 2-diphenylethylenediamine, 1, 6-hexanediamine, 1, 12-dodecanediamine, 1, 8-diamino-3, 6-dioxaoctane, and tris(2-aminoethyl)amine provided the desired dimeric (4245) and trimeric (46) triazoles in generally high yields. Such polymeric 1, 2, 3-triazoles could be used as potentially effective copper(I)-stabilizing ligands in catalysis [59, 60] and in material science [61]. The method is also suitable for a range of aromatic amines, including electron-rich and electron-poor aromatic amines, to give the corresponding 1-aryl-1, 2, 3-triazole products (4755) in good to excellent yields. Notably, we found that the electron-rich arylamines afforded the desired products in higher yields than electron-poor arylamines and needed a higher temperature to complete the reaction. It is worth noting that 4-vinyl- and 4-ethynylaniline underwent [4 + 1] annulation chemoselectively to give desired triazoles (56 and 57) in high yields without interfering with the more electron-deficient vinyl and ethynyl groups. In addition, the multisubstituted substrate could be tolerated under this standard condition, affording desired product (58) in 82% yield. Moreover, polycyclic (hetero)aromatic structures such as naphthalene, fluorene, and pyridine on amines could also be tolerated in the transformation with good yields (5961). The structure of the compound (60) was unambiguously confirmed by single-crystal X-ray crystallography (CCDC number: 2026985).

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Substrate scope for the synthesis of 1-substituted 1, 2, 3-triazole. Reaction condition: amine (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), DFHZ-Ts (0.2 mmol), and NaH (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv.), in 2 mL of EtOAc at 40 ℃ for 1, 2 h under air. a DIPEA (1.2 mmol) in 2 mL of MeOH. b Reaction conducted at 60 ℃. Isolated yields.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2.  The late-stage functionalization of complex bioactive molecules and clinical drugs. Reaction conditions: Amine (0.2 mmol), DFHZ-Ts (0.2 mmol), and DIPEA (1.2 mmol) in 2 mL of MeOH at r.t. for 3–5 h under air. a 5.0 mmol scale. Isolated yields.

    The unusual functional group tolerance of the process under mild reaction conditions makes this method may be highly useful to access otherwise challenging products in late-stage functionalization to probe this potential, a series of structurally complex small bioactive molecules and clinical drugs were applied. As depicted in Scheme 2, a large range of amino acids, such as glycine, alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, serine, and threonine were all annulated smoothly with DFHZ-Ts in the presence of DIPEA in MeOH, giving rise to 1, 2, 3-triazole-1-acetic acid derivatives (62–70) in 77%–95% yields. Similarly, dopamine (a type of neurotransmitter), D-glucamine (an amino sugar), and dehydroabietylamine (a complex natural product) could all compatible in the transformation with good yields (71–73). Remarkably, a range of marketed drugs, including pregabalin (Lyrica™, an anti-seizure drug), baclofen (LioresalTM, a muscle relaxer and an antispasmodic agent), tranexamic acid (used to treat or prevent excessive blood loss from major trauma, surgery, and heavy menstruation), all bearing a carboxylic acid group, were annulated smoothly in excellent yields (74–76). Mexiletine (used to treat abnormal heart rhythms) could also be converted to give desired triazole product (77) in 95% yield. Moreover, commonly-used anesthetic drugs such as benzocaine (Orajel) and Procaine (a local anesthetic drug) were also successfully generated the annulated products (78 and 79) in 60% and 70% yields, respectively (Scheme 2B). PH-027 is a potent antimicrobial drug against sensitive and resistant gram-positive aerobic bacteria. However, the reported method for its preparation needs a multi-step process utilizing toxic and explosive azides, acetylene gas and relatively harsh reaction conditions (2). By using our newly developed method, PH-027 can be prepared readily on a gram scale from corresponding amine, (5R)-5-(aminomethyl)-3-(3-fluoro-4-morpholin-4-ylphenyl)-1, 3-oxazolidin-2-one in a single step with 80% yield (Scheme 2C). Notably, this method offers a practical solution to address the above-mentioned issues of the previous method. Overall, the ready availability of the substrates, broad scope, excellent functional group tolerance, and mild conditions make this approach become a practical candidate for late-stage functionalization of structurally complex bioactive small molecules and marketed drugs.

    To gain insights into the reaction mechanism of this [4 + 1] annulation, control experiments were performed as shown in Scheme 3. The addition of preformed CF2HCHN2 to the standard reaction conditions led to no reaction, which excludes the possibility of CF2HCHN2 as an intermediate of this transformation (Scheme 3a). No reaction was observed when treating ethyl fluoroacetate with aniline under standard conditions (Scheme 3b).

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3.  Mechanistic studies and control experiments.

    Based on the above control experiment results and previously reported mechanistic proposals [50, 62-64], a possible mechanism of the reaction was proposed (Scheme 4). Initially, the active intermediate azoalkene B was formed through the base-promoted activation of C-F bond of 2a. The 1, 4-aza conjugate addition of an amine to azoalkene B generates intermediate C, which then eliminates the second molecule of HF, giving rise to intermediate D. Next, intermediate F was formed from D via intermediate E with the release of p-toluenesulfonic acid. Finally, the intramolecular cyclization of intermediate F provides the desired annulation product 3.

    Scheme 4

    Scheme 4.  Proposed reaction mechanism.

    In conclusion, we have demonstrated the new reactivity mode of difluoroacetaldehyde N-tosylhydrazones (DFHZ-Ts) as masked azoalkene equivalent in the [4 + 1] annulation with primary amines. This operationally simple and safe protocol provides easy access to diverse 1-substituted 1, 2, 3-triazoles under metal-, azide- and acetylene-free conditions. Operational simplicity, easy availability and stability of the reagents, mild reaction conditions, and tolerance to a wide variety of functional groups allow the late-stage derivatization of structurally complex small molecules and clinical drugs, including the gram-scale synthesis of an antibiotic drug PH-027, whose diversification was generally troublesome with other available methods. We believe that, due to its combined practicality and robustness, this method will find wide applications in both fields such as medicinal chemistry and organic synthesis.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Nos. 21871043, 21961130376), Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province (Nos. 20180101185JC, 20190701012GH, 20200801065GH), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. 2412019ZD001, 2412020ZD003).

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.09.008.


    1. [1]

      O.A. Phillips, V.O. Rotimi, W.Y. Jamal, M. Shahin, T.L. Verghese, J. Chemother.15 (2003) 113-117. doi: 10.1179/joc.2003.15.2.113

    2. [2]

      O.A. Phillips, E.E. Udo, A.A.M. Ali, N. Al-Hassawi, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11 (2003) 35-41. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0896(02)00423-6

    3. [3]

      K. Pettit, N. Curtin, M. Tartaczuch, et al., HemaSphere. 3 (2019) 369-370. doi: 10.1097/01.hs9.0000561608.73874.6a

    4. [4]

      A. Gin, L. Dilay, J. A. Karlowsky, et al., Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 5 (2007) 365-383. doi: 10.1586/14787210.5.3.365

    5. [5]

      D. Lednicer, L.A. Mitscher, The Organic Chemistry of Drug Synthesis, Wiley, New York, 1977.

    6. [6]

      O. Dimroth, G. Fester, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 43 (1910) 2219-2230.

    7. [7]

      J.C. Kauer, R.A. Carboni, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 89 (1967) 2633-2637. doi: 10.1021/ja00987a022

    8. [8]

      L.Y. Wu, Y.X. Xie, Z.S. Chen, Y.N. Niu, Y.M. Liang, Synlett9 (2009) 1453-1456.

    9. [9]

      L. Wu, B. Yan, G. Yang, Y. Chen, Heterocycl. Commun. 19 (2013) 397-400.

    10. [10]

      J. Andersen, S. Bolvig, X. Liang, Synlett19 (2005) 2941-2947.

    11. [11]

      D.C.M. Chan, C.A. Laughton, S.F. Queener, M.F.G. Stevens, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 10 (2002) 3001-3010. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0896(02)00128-1

    12. [12]

      J.T. Fletcher, S.E. Walz, M.E. Keeney, Tetrahedron Lett. 49 (2008) 7030-7032. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.09.136

    13. [13]

      Y. Jiang, C. Kuang, Q. Yang, Tetrahedron67 (2011) 289-292. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2010.11.051

    14. [14]

      Y. Jiang, C. Kuang, Q. Yang, Synlett19 (2009) 3163-3166.

    15. [15]

      J. Naud, C. Lemke, N. Goudreau, et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 3400-3404. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.04.012

    16. [16]

      Q. Yang, Y. Jiang, C. Kuang, Helv. Chim. Acta95 (2012) 448-454. doi: 10.1002/hlca.201100256

    17. [17]

      M. Xu, C. Kuang, Z. Wang, Q. Yang, Y. Jiang, Synthesis2 (2011) 223-228.

    18. [18]

      A. Kolarovič, M. Schnürch, M.D. Mihovilovic, J. Org. Chem. 76 (2011) 2613-2618. doi: 10.1021/jo1024927

    19. [19]

      Y. Liu, C. Han, X. Ma, et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 59 (2018) 650-653. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2018.01.012

    20. [20]

      C. Han, S. Dong, W. Zhang, Z. Chen, Synlett29 (2018) 673-677. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1589157

    21. [21]

      D. Häbich, W. Barth, M. Rösner, Heterocycles29 (1989) 2083-2088. doi: 10.3987/COM-89-5171

    22. [22]

      P.K. Kadaba, J. Org. Chem. 57 (1992) 3075-3078. doi: 10.1021/jo00037a024

    23. [23]

      T. Sasaki, S. Eguchi, M. Yamaguchi, T. Esaki, J. Org. Chem. 46 (1981) 1800-1804. doi: 10.1021/jo00322a009

    24. [24]

      Z. Huang, R. Wang, S. Sheng, R. Zhou, M. Cai, React. Funct. Polym. 73 (2013) 224-227. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2012.11.002

    25. [25]

      M.C. Giel, C.J. Smedley, E.R.R. Mackie, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 1181-1186. doi: 10.1002/anie.201912728

    26. [26]

      R.J. Lewis, N.I. Sax, Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1992.

    27. [27]

      S. Bräse, C. Gil, K. Knepper, V. Zimmermann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (2005) 5188-5240. doi: 10.1002/anie.200400657

    28. [28]

      S. Bräse, K. Banert, Organic Azides: Syntheses and Applications, Wiley: New York, 2010.

    29. [29]

      T. Kalliokoski, ACS Comb. Sci. 17 (2015) 600-607. doi: 10.1021/acscombsci.5b00063

    30. [30]

      P. Ruiz-Castillo, S.L. Buchwald, Chem. Rev. 116 (2016) 12564-12649. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00512

    31. [31]

      C. Liu, M. Szoszak, Chem. Eur. J. 23 (2017) 7157-7173. doi: 10.1002/chem.201605012

    32. [32]

      A. Ricci, Amino Group Chemistry: From Synthesis to the Life Sciences; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008.

    33. [33]

      K. Sakai, N. Hida, K. Kondo, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 59 (1986) 179-183. doi: 10.1246/bcsj.59.179

    34. [34]

      R. Hanselmann, G.E. Job, G. Johnson, et al., Org. Process Res. Dev. 14 (2010) 152-158. doi: 10.1021/op900252a

    35. [35]

      S.S. van Berkel, S. Brauch, L. Gabriel, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (2012) 5343-5346. doi: 10.1002/anie.201108850

    36. [36]

      Z. Chen, Q. Yan, Z. Liu, Y. Xu, Y. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (2013) 13324-13328. doi: 10.1002/anie.201306416

    37. [37]

      Z.J. Cai, X.M. Lu, Y. Zi, et al., Org. Lett. 16 (2014) 5108-5111. doi: 10.1021/ol502431b

    38. [38]

      Z. Chen, Q. Yan, Z. Liu, Y. Zhang, Chem. Eur. J. 20 (2014) 17635-17639. doi: 10.1002/chem.201405057

    39. [39]

      Z. Chen, Q. Yan, H. Yi, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 20 (2014) 13692-13697. doi: 10.1002/chem.201403515

    40. [40]

      H. W. Bai, Z. J. Cai, S. Y. Wang, S. J. Ji, Org. Lett. 17 (2015) 2898-2901. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01000

    41. [41]

      L. Li, S. Huang, T. Shang, et al., J. Org. Chem. 83 (2018) 13166-13177. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01899

    42. [42]

      A. Zhu, L. Li, C. Zhang, et al., Green Chem. 21 (2019), 307-313. doi: 10.1039/c8gc03119c

    43. [43]

      P.R. Clark, G.D. Williams, J.F. Hayes, N.C.O. Tomkinson, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 6740-6744. doi: 10.1002/anie.201915944

    44. [44]

      S.J.M. Patterson, P.R. Clark, G.D. Williams, N.C.O. Tomkinson, Tetrahedron Lett. 61 (2020) 152483. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2020.152483

    45. [45]

      P. Sivaguru, X. Bi, Sci. China Chem. (2021), 10.1007/s11426-021-1052-7. doi: 10.1007/s11426-021-1052-7

    46. [46]

      X. Zhang, Z. Liu, X. Yang, et al., Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 284-292. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08253-z

    47. [47]

      X. Zhang, C. Tian, Z. Wang, et al., ACS Catal. 11 (2021) 8527-8537. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c01483

    48. [48]

      H. Wang, Y. Ning, Y. Sun, P. Sivaguru, X. Bi, Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 2012-2016. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00395

    49. [49]

      Y. Ma, B.R.P. Reddy, X. Bi, Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 9860-9863. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b03740

    50. [50]

      Y. Ning, Y. Gai, X. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 6473-6481. doi: 10.1002/anie.202000119

    51. [51]

      D.S. Wishart, Y.D. Feunang, A.C. Guo, et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 46 (2017) D1074-D1082.

    52. [52]

      D.C. Blakemore, L. Castro, I. Churcher, et al., Nat. Chem. 10 (2018) 383-394. doi: 10.1038/s41557-018-0021-z

    53. [53]

      Y. Shi, X. Ye, Q. Gu, X. Shi, Z. Song, Org. Biomol. Chem. 13 (2015) 5407-5411. doi: 10.1039/C5OB00479A

    54. [54]

      C. Wang, F. Zhou, J. Zhou, Chin. J. Org. Chem. 40 (2020) 3065-3077. doi: 10.6023/cjoc202005020

    55. [55]

      C. Wang, R.Y. Zhu, K. Liao, F. Zhou, J. Zhou, Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 1270-1274. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b04522

    56. [56]

      B.T. Worrell, J.A. Malik, V.V. Fokin, Science340 (2013) 457-460. doi: 10.1126/science.1229506

    57. [57]

      M.S. Ziegler, K.V. Lakshmi, T.D. Tilley, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 5378-5386. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b13261

    58. [58]

      J.C. Meng, V.V. Fokin, M.G. Finn, Tetrahedron Lett. 45 (2005) 4543-4546.

    59. [59]

      A. Qin, J.W.Y. Lam, B. Tang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39 (2010) 2522-2544. doi: 10.1039/b909064a

    60. [60]

      J.A. Johnson, M.G. Finn, J.T. Koberstein, N.J. Turro, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 29 (2008) 1052-1072. doi: 10.1002/marc.200800208

    61. [61]

      T.R. Chan, R. Hilgraf, K.B. Sharpless, V.V. Fokin, Org. Lett. 6 (2004) 2853-2855. doi: 10.1021/ol0493094

    62. [62]

      S.M.M. Lopes, A.L. Cardoso, A. Lemoś, T.M.V.D. Pinho e Melo, Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 11324-11352. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00375

    63. [63]

      Z. Chen, L. Meng, Z. Ding, J. Hu, Curr. Org. Chem. 23 (2019) 164-187. doi: 10.2174/1385272823666190227162840

    64. [64]

      F. Shang, J. Liu, P. Zhou, C. Zhang, Tetrahedron77 (2021) 131737.

  • Figure 1  Inspiration towards the synthesis of 1-substituted 1, 2, 3-triazoles. (A) Examples of bioactive molecules containing 1-substituted 1, 2, 3-triazole moiety. (B) Different reactivity modes of DFHZ-Tfs. (C) This work: DFHZ as an azoalkence equivalent in the [4 + 1] annulation with primary amines.

    Scheme 1  Substrate scope for the synthesis of 1-substituted 1, 2, 3-triazole. Reaction condition: amine (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), DFHZ-Ts (0.2 mmol), and NaH (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv.), in 2 mL of EtOAc at 40 ℃ for 1, 2 h under air. a DIPEA (1.2 mmol) in 2 mL of MeOH. b Reaction conducted at 60 ℃. Isolated yields.

    Scheme 2  The late-stage functionalization of complex bioactive molecules and clinical drugs. Reaction conditions: Amine (0.2 mmol), DFHZ-Ts (0.2 mmol), and DIPEA (1.2 mmol) in 2 mL of MeOH at r.t. for 3–5 h under air. a 5.0 mmol scale. Isolated yields.

    Scheme 3  Mechanistic studies and control experiments.

    Scheme 4  Proposed reaction mechanism.

    Table 1.  Optimization of reaction conditions.a

    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  3
  • 文章访问数:  982
  • HTML全文浏览量:  93
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2022-03-15
  • 收稿日期:  2021-07-09
  • 接受日期:  2021-09-01
  • 修回日期:  2021-08-31
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-09-08
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章