Developing a Support Vector Machine Based QSPR Model to PredictGas-t<i>o</i>-Benzene Solvation Enthalpy of Organic Compounds

引用本文: GOLMOHAMMADI Hassan, DASHTBOZORGI Zahra, KHOOSHECHIN Sajad. Developing a Support Vector Machine Based QSPR Model to PredictGas-to-Benzene Solvation Enthalpy of Organic Compounds[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(5): 918-926. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201701163 shu

Citation: GOLMOHAMMADI Hassan, DASHTBOZORGI Zahra, KHOOSHECHIN Sajad. Developing a Support Vector Machine Based QSPR Model to PredictGas-to-Benzene Solvation Enthalpy of Organic Compounds[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2017, 33(5): 918-926. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201701163 shu

Developing a Support Vector Machine Based QSPR Model to PredictGas-to-Benzene Solvation Enthalpy of Organic Compounds

1.
Young Researchers and Elite Club, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahr-e-Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran;
2.
Young Researchers and Elite Club, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

摘要: The purpose of this paper is to present a novel way to building quantitative structure-propertyrelationship (QSPR) models for predicting the gas-to-benzene solvation enthalpy (ΔH_Solv) of 158 organiccompounds based on molecular descriptors calculated from the structure alone. Different kinds of descriptorswere calculated for each compounds using dragon package. The variable selection technique of enhancedreplacement method (ERM) was employed to select optimal subset of descriptors. Our investigation revealsthat the dependence of physico-chemical properties on solvation enthalpy is a nonlinear observable fact andthat ERM method is unable to model the solvation enthalpy accurately. The standard error value of predictionset for support vector machine (SVM) is 1.681 kJ·mol^-1 while it is 4.624 kJ·mol^-1 for ERM. The resultsestablished that the calculated ΔH_Solv values by SVM were in good agreement with the experimental ones, andthe performances of the SVM models were superior to those obtained by ERM one. This indicates that SVMcan be used as an alternative modeling tool for QSPR studies.

关键词:

Quantitative structure-property relationship
/ Gas-to-benzene solvation enthalpy
/ Descriptor;Enhanced replacement method
/ Support vector machine

English

Developing a Support Vector Machine Based QSPR Model to PredictGas-to-Benzene Solvation Enthalpy of Organic Compounds

1.
Young Researchers and Elite Club, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahr-e-Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran;
2.
Young Researchers and Elite Club, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Received Date: 13 December 2016
Revised Date: 16 January 2017
Available Online: 16 January 2017

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to present a novel way to building quantitative structure-propertyrelationship (QSPR) models for predicting the gas-to-benzene solvation enthalpy (ΔH_Solv) of 158 organiccompounds based on molecular descriptors calculated from the structure alone. Different kinds of descriptorswere calculated for each compounds using dragon package. The variable selection technique of enhancedreplacement method (ERM) was employed to select optimal subset of descriptors. Our investigation revealsthat the dependence of physico-chemical properties on solvation enthalpy is a nonlinear observable fact andthat ERM method is unable to model the solvation enthalpy accurately. The standard error value of predictionset for support vector machine (SVM) is 1.681 kJ·mol^-1 while it is 4.624 kJ·mol^-1 for ERM. The resultsestablished that the calculated ΔH_Solv values by SVM were in good agreement with the experimental ones, andthe performances of the SVM models were superior to those obtained by ERM one. This indicates that SVMcan be used as an alternative modeling tool for QSPR studies.

Key words:

Quantitative structure-property relationship
/ Gas-to-benzene solvation enthalpy
/ Descriptor;Enhanced replacement method
/ Support vector machine

1. [1]
  Duffy, E. M.; Jorgensen, W. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2878. doi: 10.1021/ja993663t
2. [2]
  Cornell, W. E.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C. I.; Merz, K. M.; Ferguson, D. M.; Spellmayer, D. C.; Fox, T.; Caldwell, J.W.; Kollman, P.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179. doi: 10.1021/ja00124a002
3. [3]
  Graziano, G. Can. J. Chem. 2000, 78, 1233. doi: 10.1139/v00-125
4. [4]
  Graziano, G. Biophys. Chem. 1999, 82, 69. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4622(99)00063-0
5. [5]
  Graziano, G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 9249. doi: 10.1021/jp001461
6. [6]
  Garde, S.; Garcia, A. E.; Pratt, L. R.; Hummer, G. Biophys.Chem. 1999, 78, 21. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4622(99)00018-6
7. [7]
  Mintz, C.; Burton, K.; Acree, W. E., Jr.; Abraham, M. H. FluidPhase Equilibr. 2007, 258, 191. doi: 10.1016/j.fluid.2007.06.016
8. [8]
  Chickos, J. S.; Acr
9. [9]
  ee, W. E., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2003, 32, 519.doi: 10.1063/1.1529214
10. [10]
  Chickos, J. S.; Acree, W. E., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2002, 31, 537. doi: 10.1063/1.1475333
11. [11]
  Borges does Santos, R. M.; Muralha, V. S. F.; Correia, C. F.; Simões, J. A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12670.doi: 10.1021/ja010703w
12. [12]
  Laarhoven, L. J. J.; Mulder, P.; Wayner, D. D. M. Acc. Chem.Res. 1999, 32, 342. doi: 10.1021/ar9703443
13. [13]
  Hansch, C.; Leo, A. Exploring QSAR: Fundamentals andApplications in Chemistry and Biology, American ChemicalSociety, Washington DC, 1995. doi: 10.1021/jm950902o
14. [14]
  Bao, L.; Sun, Z. R. FEBS Lett. 2002, 521, 109. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02835-1
15. [15]
  Belousov, A. I.; Verzakov, S. A.; Von Frese, J. Chemom. Intell.Lab. Syst. 2002, 64, 15. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7439(02)00046-1
16. [16]
  Cai, Y. D.; Liu, X. J.; Xu, X. B.; Chou, K. C. Comput. Chem.2002, 26, 293. doi: 10.1016/S0097-8485(01)00113-9
17. [17]
  Morris, C.W.; Autret, A.; Boddy, L. Ecol. Model. 2001, 146, 57.doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00296-4
18. [18]
  Song, M. H.; Breneman, C. M.; Bi, J. B.; Sukumar, N.; Bennett, K. P.; Cramer, S.; Tugcu, N. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1347. doi: 10.1021/ci025580t
19. [19]
  Liu, H. X.; Zhang, R. S.; Luan, F.; Yao, X. J.; Liu, M. C.; Hu, Z.D.; Fan, B. T. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 900.doi: 10.1021/ci0256438
20. [20]
  Liu, H. X.; Zhang, R. S.; Yao, X. J.; Liu, M. C.; Hu, Z. D.; Fan, B. T. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1288. doi: 10.1021/ci0340355
21. [21]
  Golmohammadi, H.; Dashtbozorgi, Z.; Acree, W. E., Jr. Struct.Chem. 2013, 24, 1799. doi: 10.1007/s11224-013-0222-4
22. [22]
  Golmohammadi, H.; Dashtbozorgi, Z.; Acree, W. E., Jr. Phys.Chem. Liq. 2013, 51, 182. doi: 10.1080/00319104.2012.708932
23. [23]
  Dashtbozorgi, Z.; Golmohammadi, H.; Acree, W. E., Jr.Thermochim. Acta 2012, 539, 7. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2012.03.017
24. [24]
  Golmohammadi, H.; Dashtbozorgi, Z.; Acree, W. E., Jr. Mol.Inf. 2012, 31, 867. doi: 10.1002/minf.201200091
25. [25]
  Dashtbozorgi, Z.; Golmohammadi, H.; Acree, W. E., Jr. Eur. J.Pharm. Sci. 2012, 47, 421. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.06.021
26. [26]
  Mintz, C.; Clark, M.; Burton, K.; Acree, W. E., Jr.; Abraham, M.H. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2007, 26, 881. doi: 10.1002/qsar.200630152
27. [27]
  Toubaei, A.; Golmohammadi, H.; Dashtbozorgi, Z.; Acree, W.E., Jr. J. Mol. Liq. 2012, 175, 24. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2012.08.006
28. [28]
  Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V. Molecular Descriptors forChemoinformatics.Wiley VCH:Weinheim, 2009. doi: 10.1002/9783527628766.ch22
29. [29]
  Hyperchem, re. 4. for Windows, Autodesk, Sansalito, CA, 1995.
30. [30]
  Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V.; Pavan, M. Dragon Software, Milano, 2002.
31. [31]
  Mercader, A. G.; Duchowicz, P. R.; Fernández, F. M.; Castro, E.A. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 1575. doi: 10.1021/ci200079b
32. [32]
  MATLAB 7.0, The Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA, 2005, http://www.mathworks.com.
33. [33]
  Baghban, A.; Ahmadi, M. A.; Pouladi, B.; Amanna, B.J. Supercrit. Fluids 2015, 101, 184. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2015.03.004
34. [34]
  Vapnik, V. N.; Lerner, A. Autom. Remote Control 1963, 24, 774.
35. [35]
  Vapnik, V. N.; Chervonenkis, A. Y. Autom. Remote Control 1964, 25, 821.
36. [36]
  Rojas, C.; Duchowicz, P. R.; Tripaldi, P.; Pis Diez, R.Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2015, 140, 126. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2014.09.020
37. [37]
  Mercader, G.; Duchowicz, P. R.; Fernández, F. M.; Castro, E. A.Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2008, 92, 138. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2008.02.005
38. [38]
  Gramatica, P. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2007, 26, 694. doi: 10.1002/qsar.200610151
39. [39]
  Cao, D. S.; Liang, Y. Z.; Xu, Q. S.; Li, H. D.; Chen, X.J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 592. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21351
40. [40]
  Yan, J.; Huang, J. H.; He, M.; Lu, H. B.; Yang, R.; Kong, B.; Xu, Q. S.; Liang, Y. Z. J. Sep. Sci. 2013, 36, 2464. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201300254
41. [41]
  Cao, D. S.; Liang, Y. Z.; Xu, Q. S.; Yun, Y. H.; Li, H. D.J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2011, 25, 67. doi: 10.1007/s10822-010-9401-1
42. [42]
  Eriksson, L.; Jaworska, J.; Worth, A. P.; Cronin, M. T.; McDowell, R. M.; Gramatica, P. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 1361. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5758
43. [43]
  Golbraikh, A.; Shen, M.; Xiao, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Lee, K. H.; Tropsha, A. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 17, 241.doi: 10.1023/A:1025386326946
44. [44]
  Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2002, 20, 269.doi: 10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1
45. [45]
  Agrawal, V. K.; Khadikar, P.V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 911, 3035. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0896(01)00211-5
46. [46]
  Pourbasheer, E.; Riahi, S.; Ganjali, M. R.; Norouzi, P.J. Enzyme. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2010, 256, 844. doi: 10.3109/14756361003757893
47. [47]
  Antipin, I. S.; Arslanov, N. A.; Palyulin, V. A.; Konovalov, A. I.; Zefirov, N. S. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 1991, 316, 925.
48. [48]
  Sarkar, R.; Roy, A. B.; Sarkar, P. K. Math. Biosci. 1978, 39, 299.doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(78)90060-3
49. [49]
  Geary, R.C. Incorp. Statist. 1954, 5, 15. doi: 10.2307/2986645
50. [50]
  Moreau, G.; Broto, P. Nouv. J. Chim. 1980, 4, 757.
51. [51]
  Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V. Handbook of MolecularDescriptors, In: Methods and Principles in MedicinalChemistry; Mannhold, R., Kubinyi, H., Timmerman, H. Eds.; Wiley-VCH:Weinheim, 2000. doi: 10.1002/9783527613106
52. [52]
  Ma, S.; Lv, M.; Deng, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhai, H.; Lv, W. J. Hazard.Mater. 2015, 283, 591. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.10.011

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 2
文章访问数: 321
HTML全文浏览量: 34

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Developing a Support Vector Machine Based QSPR Model to PredictGas-to-Benzene Solvation Enthalpy of Organic Compounds

English

Developing a Support Vector Machine Based QSPR Model to PredictGas-to-Benzene Solvation Enthalpy of Organic Compounds

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

Developing a Support Vector Machine Based QSPR Model to PredictGas-to-Benzene Solvation Enthalpy of Organic Compounds

English

Developing a Support Vector Machine Based QSPR Model to PredictGas-to-Benzene Solvation Enthalpy of Organic Compounds

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs