水溶液中氢键寿命的定义和弛豫机理

引用本文: 张霞, 张强, 赵东霞. 水溶液中氢键寿命的定义和弛豫机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27(11): 2547-2552. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20111107 shu

Citation: ZHANG Xia, ZHANG Qiang, ZHAO Dong-Xia. Hydrogen Bond Lifetime Definitions and the Relaxation Mechanism in Water Solutions[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2011, 27(11): 2547-2552. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20111107 shu

水溶液中氢键寿命的定义和弛豫机理

张霞 ^1, ,
张强 ^1, ,
赵东霞 ^2,

基金项目:
国家自然科学基金(20873055)资助项目 (20873055)

摘要: 氢键弛豫过程决定水溶液中分子的动力学行为, 氢键寿命作为理论和实验结果中一个重要的参数通常用以描述溶液中的氢键动力学性质. 本文采用SPC/E-P2和SPC/E-OPLS两种力场方法对二甲基亚砜(DMSO)水溶液体系进行分子动力学模拟, 计算了四种不同定义下的氢键寿命, 并进行了对比阐述. 连续性氢键寿命τ_C和基于动力学平衡方法下的氢键寿命τ_R较短, 它们忽略了不成功的氢键交换过程, 稳定态模型下的氢键寿命τ_PR能够真实体现氢键转换过程, 可作为标度衡量其它量值. 间歇性氢键寿命τ_I相对最长, 重复统计了氢键成功交换后的恢复概率. 随着二甲基亚砜浓度增大, τ_C、τ_I、τ_R和τ_PR不断增大, 分子平动扩散系数在中等浓度达到极小, 说明氢键寿命与分子活动性无决定性关联, 同类型氢键在不同浓度下的寿命差异表明氢键寿命具有分子环境依赖性; 水分子和二甲基亚砜分子氢键个数降低, 氢键受激角度扭曲和拉伸概率下降, τ_C和τ_R不断接近, 氢键交换受体密度降低使氢键交换速率下降, τ_PR不断增大, 氢键寿命与其周围氢键密度密切相关. τ_I 与τ_PR的比值体现了氢键交换的局域性, 其变化趋势与分子平动活动性趋势相同. 两种力场下氢键寿命的差异也说明氢键的寿命具有明显的理论模型依赖性.

关键词:

English

Hydrogen Bond Lifetime Definitions and the Relaxation Mechanism in Water Solutions

1.
1. Institute of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Food Safety, Bohai University, Jinzhou 121000, Liaoning Province, P. R. China;
2. Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning Proveince, P. R. China
Received Date: 08 July 2011
Available Online: 27 October 2011
Fund Project:
国家自然科学基金(20873055)资助项目

Abstract: The molecular dynamics behaviors in water solutions are determined by the hydrogen bond (H-bond) relaxations. The H-bond lifetime, as an important experimental and theoretical parameter, is often used to explore the general kinetics of H-bond dynamics. In this work, four different H-bond lifetimes were defined and calculated in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-water mixtures with two widely-used combined force fields, SPC/E-P2 and SPC/E-OPLS. The continuous and kinetic based H-bond lifetimes, τ_C and τ_R, are always shorter than the τ_PR of stable states due to neglecting of unsuccessful H-bond exchanges. The intermittent H-bond lifetime τ_I was found to be the longest because of a recount of the reforming events after the successful switching event. The H-bond lifetimes, τ_C, τ_I, τ_R, and τ_PR increase with the mole fraction of DMSO (x_D). This trend is not consistent with that of the molecular diffuse constants. This shows that the molecular mobility is not a decisive factor to the H-bond lifetime. The environment-dependent H-bond lifetimes suggest that the stronger H-bonds should not always remain longer time. The H-bond coordination numbers of water and DMSO decrease with x_D. The distortion and elongation probability of the H-bond that was induced by surrounding molecules decreases and, therefore, so the τ_C and τ_R approach each other at the limiting concentrations in this work. The facts above show that the labeled H-bond lifetime is closely related to the H-bond density around it. One H-bond switching event only takes place on one new available acceptor there. The localized character of H-bond relaxation is consistent with the trend of the molecular mobility trend. The H-bond lifetimes also rely on the theoretical model used in the simulations.

Key words:

1. [1]
  (1) Bagchi, B. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 3197(1) Bagchi, B. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 3197
2. [2]
  (2) Bakker, H. J.; Skinner, J. L. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1498.(2) Bakker, H. J.; Skinner, J. L. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1498.
3. [3]
  (3) Rezus, Y. L. A.; Bakker, H. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 114502.(3) Rezus, Y. L. A.; Bakker, H. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 114502.
4. [4]
  (4) Eaves, J. D.; Loparo, J. J.; Fecko, C. J.; Roberts, S. T.; Tokmakoff, A.; Geissler, P. L. PNAS 2005, 102, 13019.(4) Eaves, J. D.; Loparo, J. J.; Fecko, C. J.; Roberts, S. T.; Tokmakoff, A.; Geissler, P. L. PNAS 2005, 102, 13019.
5. [5]
  (5) Fayer, M. D. Ann. Rev. P. Chem. 2008, 60, 21.(5) Fayer, M. D. Ann. Rev. P. Chem. 2008, 60, 21.
6. [6]
  (6) Fayer, M. D.; Levinger, N. E. Ann. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2010, 3, 89.(6) Fayer, M. D.; Levinger, N. E. Ann. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2010, 3, 89.
7. [7]
  (7) Luzar, A.; Chandler, D. Nature 1996, 379, 55.(7) Luzar, A.; Chandler, D. Nature 1996, 379, 55.
8. [8]
  (8) Tay, K. A.; Bresme, F. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 409.(8) Tay, K. A.; Bresme, F. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 409.
9. [9]
  (9) Sciortino, F.; Geiger, A.; Stanley, H. E. Nature 1991, 354, 218.(9) Sciortino, F.; Geiger, A.; Stanley, H. E. Nature 1991, 354, 218.
10. [10]
  (10) Csajka, F.; Chandler, D. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 1125.(10) Csajka, F.; Chandler, D. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 1125.
11. [11]
  (11) Luzar, A. Faraday Discussions 1996, 103, 29.(11) Luzar, A. Faraday Discussions 1996, 103, 29.
12. [12]
  (12) Laage, D.; Hynes, J. T. Science 2006, 311, 832. (12) Laage, D.; Hynes, J. T. Science 2006, 311, 832.
13. [13]
  (13) Berkelbach, T. C.; Lee, H. S.; Tuckerman, M. E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 238302.(13) Berkelbach, T. C.; Lee, H. S.; Tuckerman, M. E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 238302.
14. [14]
  (14) Zasetsky, A. Y.; Petelina, S. V.; Lyashchenko, A. K.; Lileev, A. S. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 134502.(14) Zasetsky, A. Y.; Petelina, S. V.; Lyashchenko, A. K.; Lileev, A. S. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 134502.
15. [15]
  (15) Stirnemann, G.; Sterpone, F.; Laage, D. J. Phys. Chem B 2011, 115, 3254,(15) Stirnemann, G.; Sterpone, F.; Laage, D. J. Phys. Chem B 2011, 115, 3254,
16. [16]
  (16) Levinger, N. E.; Fayer, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5530.(16) Levinger, N. E.; Fayer, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5530.
17. [17]
  (17) Tielrooij, K. J.; Hunger, J.; Buchner, R.; Bonn, M.; Bakker, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15671. (17) Tielrooij, K. J.; Hunger, J.; Buchner, R.; Bonn, M.; Bakker, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15671.
18. [18]
  (18) Laage, D.; Stirnemann, G.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 2428.(18) Laage, D.; Stirnemann, G.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 2428.
19. [19]
  (19) Chowdhary, J.; Ladanyi, B. M. J. Phys .Chem. B 2009, 113, 4045.(19) Chowdhary, J.; Ladanyi, B. M. J. Phys .Chem. B 2009, 113, 4045.
20. [20]
  (20) Laage, D.; Hynes, J. T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 433, 80.(20) Laage, D.; Hynes, J. T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 433, 80.
21. [21]
  (21) (a) Soper, A. K.; Luzar, A. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 1320 (b) Luzar, A.; Soper, A. K.; Chandler, D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 6836 (c) Soper, A. K.; Luzar, A. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 100, 1357.(21) (a) Soper, A. K.; Luzar, A. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 1320 (b) Luzar, A.; Soper, A. K.; Chandler, D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 6836 (c) Soper, A. K.; Luzar, A. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 100, 1357.
22. [22]
  (22) Kirchner, B.; Hutter, J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 364, 497. (22) Kirchner, B.; Hutter, J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 364, 497.
23. [23]
  (23) (a) Borin, I. A.; Skaf, M. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 6412 (b) Skaf, M. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 7996.(23) (a) Borin, I. A.; Skaf, M. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 6412 (b) Skaf, M. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 7996.
24. [24]
  (24) Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X. J. Mol. Liq. 2009, 145, 67.(24) Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X. J. Mol. Liq. 2009, 145, 67.
25. [25]
  (25) Lu, Z.; Manias, E.; MacDonald, D. D.; Lanagan, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 12207.(25) Lu, Z.; Manias, E.; MacDonald, D. D.; Lanagan, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 12207.
26. [26]
  (26) Laage D.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem B 2008, 112, 7697. (26) Laage D.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem B 2008, 112, 7697.
27. [27]
  (27) Zheng, Y. J.; Ornstein, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4175.(27) Zheng, Y. J.; Ornstein, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4175.
28. [28]
  (28) Essmann, U.; Perera, L.; Berkowitz, M. L.; Darden, T.; Lee, H.; Pedersen, L. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 8577.(28) Essmann, U.; Perera, L.; Berkowitz, M. L.; Darden, T.; Lee, H.; Pedersen, L. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 8577.
29. [29]
  (29) Steinbach, P. J.; Brooks, B. R. J. Comput. Chem. 1994, 15, 667.(29) Steinbach, P. J.; Brooks, B. R. J. Comput. Chem. 1994, 15, 667.
30. [30]
  (30) Rey, R.; Ingrosso, F.; Elsaesser, T.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 8949.(30) Rey, R.; Ingrosso, F.; Elsaesser, T.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 8949.

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 1260
文章访问数: 3936
HTML全文浏览量: 188

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

水溶液中氢键寿命的定义和弛豫机理

English

Hydrogen Bond Lifetime Definitions and the Relaxation Mechanism in Water Solutions

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

水溶液中氢键寿命的定义和弛豫机理

English

Hydrogen Bond Lifetime Definitions and the Relaxation Mechanism in Water Solutions

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs