植物样品中低水平铀同位素分析

引用本文: 鲁彤, 侯小琳, 张路远, 陈宁, 张伟超, 王妍芸. 植物样品中低水平铀同位素分析[J]. 分析化学, 2018, 46(7): 1137-1144. doi: 10.11895/j.issn.0253-3820.181098 shu

Citation: LU Tong, HOU Xiao-Lin, ZHANG Lu-Yuan, CHEN Ning, ZHANG Wei-Chao, WANG Yan-Yun. Determination of Low Level Uranium Isotopes in Vegetation Samples[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 46(7): 1137-1144. doi: 10.11895/j.issn.0253-3820.181098 shu

植物样品中低水平铀同位素分析

1.
中国科学院地球环境研究所黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室, 西安 710061;
2.
陕西省加速器质谱技术及应用重点实验室, 西安加速器质谱中心, 西安 710061;
3.
中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
基金项目:
本文系科技部基础性工作专项项目（No.2015FY110800）、国家自然科学基金项目（No.11605207）和黄土与第四纪国家重点实验室培育项目资助

摘要: 建立了一种植物样品中痕量铀同位素（²³⁸U、²³⁵U和²³⁴U）的分析方法。通过高温灰化去除植物样品中有机质，采用混合酸消解样品灰分，应用UTEVA萃取色谱分离和纯化铀。化学分离过程中铀的回收率达94%，对Na、K、Ca等基体和干扰元素的去除率超过99%。用高灵敏度ICP-MS/MS同时测定了3种天然铀同位素含量，对²³⁸U、²³⁵U、²³⁴U的检出限分别为3.05、0.34和0.04 pg/g，其中对²³⁸U和²³⁵U的检出限比文献报道值低1个数量级。对小麦粉标准参考物质中²³⁸U的分析结果与参考值吻合，表明本分析方法可靠。将本方法应用于中国西安地区植物样品中铀同位素的分析，结果表明，该地区植物中铀含量和铀同位素比值处于天然水平，未发现人为铀污染。这是中国植物样品中3种天然铀同位素水平的首次调查。

关键词:

English

Determination of Low Level Uranium Isotopes in Vegetation Samples

1.
State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an 710061, China;
2.
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Technology and Application, Xi'an Accelerator Mass Spectrometer Center, Xi'an 710061, China;
3.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Received Date: 05 February 2018
Revised Date: 02 April 2018
Fund Project:
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2015FY110800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11605207) and the State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology.

Abstract: An analytical method was developed for determination of low-level uranium isotopes in vegetation samples. Dry ashing method was employed to decompose organic matters of vegetation. The sample ash was further digested using multiple acids. Uranium in the prepared sample solution was separated and purified by an extraction chromatography using UTEVA resin. The chemical recovery of uranium in the separation procedure was more than 94%, and more than 99% of Na, K, Ca and other matrix elements and interfering elements were removed. Three natural uranium isotopes were finally measured with high sensitivity ICP-MS/MS. The detection limits of the method for²³⁸U, ²³⁵U, ²³⁴U were 3.05, 0.34 and 0.04 pg/g, respectively. The detection limits for ²³⁸U and ²³⁵U were 10 times better than the reported values. Analysis result of U in GBW-10046 standard reference material was in good agreement with reference value, indicating that this method was reliable. The method was successfully applied to determination of uranium isotopes in the vegetation samples collected in Xi'an region, and it was found that the uranium concentrations and isotopic ratios in these vegetation samples fall well into natural level, and there was no significant artificial uranium contamination. This was the first survey of the three natural uranium isotopes in vegetation samples in this region.

Key words:

Uranium
/ Isotope ratio
/ Vegetation samples
/ Solid phase extraction
/ Inductively coupled plasma tandem mass spectrometry

1. [1]
  Sakaguchi A, Kawai K, Steier P, Quinto F, Mino K, Tomita J, Hoshi M, Whitehead N, Yamamoto M. Sci. Total Environ., 2009, 407(14):4238-4242
2. [2]
  Eigl R, Srncik M, Steier P, Wallner G. J. Environ. Radioact., 2013, 116:54-58
3. [3]
  Pourcelot L, Masson O, Renaud P, Cagnat X, Boulet B, Cariou N, De Vismes-Ott A. J. Environ. Radioact., 2015, 141:1-7
4. [4]
  Guirguis L A, Farag N M, Salim A K. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 2015, 777:211-217
5. [5]
  Sahoo S K. Indian J. Phys., 2009, 83(6):787-797
6. [6]
  Godoy M L D P, Julião L M Q C, Godoy J M. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 2009, 133(4):234-239
7. [7]
  Tsai T L, Lin C C, Chu T C. Appl. Radiat. Isot., 2008, 66(8):1097-1103
8. [8]
  Haciyakupoglu S, Gencay S. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 1999, 241(3):611-616
9. [9]
  Dreyfus S, PéCheyran C, Magnier C, Prinzhofer A, Donard O. J. ASTM Int., 2017, 2(2):797-809
10. [10]
  Casacuberta N, Lehritani M, Mantero J, Masqué P, Garcia-Orellana J, Garcia-Tenorio R. Appl. Radiat. Isot., 2012, 70(4):568-573
11. [11]
  Masson P, Dalix T, Bussière S. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2010, 41(3):231-243
12. [12]
  WANG Chen, ZHAO Yong-Gang, ZHANG Ji-Long, JIANG Xiao-Yan, CHANG Zhi-Yuan, ZHU Liu-Chao. Journal of Chinese Mass Spectrometry Society, 2010, 31(1):34-38 王琛, 赵永刚, 张继龙, 姜小燕, 常志远, 朱留超. 质谱学报, 2010, 31(1):34-38
13. [13]
  SUN De-Zhong, AN Zi-Yi, XU Chun-Xue, WANG Su-Ming, WANG Ya-Ping. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2012, 31(6):961-966 孙德忠, 安子怡, 许春雪, 王苏明, 王亚平. 岩矿测试, 2012, 31(6):961-966
14. [14]
  Okuda T, Kato J, Mori J, Tenmoku M, Suda Y, Tanaka S, He K, Ma Y, Yang F, Yu X. Sci. Total Environ., 2004, 330(1-3):145-158
15. [15]
  Lloyd N, Parrish R, Horstwood M A, Chenery S N. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 2009, 24(6):752-758
16. [16]
  WANG Wei, LI Zhi-Ming, XU Jiang, ZHOU Guo-Qing, SHEN Xiao-Pan, Zhai Li-Hua. Chinese J. Anal. Chem., 2015, 43(5):703-708 汪伟, 李志明, 徐江, 周国庆, 沈小攀, 翟利华. 分析化学, 2015, 43(5):703-708
17. [17]
  Maxwell S L, Hutchison J B, Mcalister D R. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2015, 305(2):1-11
18. [18]
  Nisa Q U, Ali A, Khan M H. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2013, 295(3):2203-2214
19. [19]
  Croudace I, Warwick P, Taylor R, Dee S. Anal. Chim. Acta, 1998, 371(2-3):217-225
20. [20]
  Veyseh S, Niazi A. Talanta, 2016, 147:117-123
21. [21]
  Raileanu M E. Tensor New, 2009, 71(3):225-233
22. [22]
  Rǎileanu M, Cecal A. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2008, 277(3):587-590
23. [23]
  CHENG Yu-Mei, SUN Xian-Ming, KANG Ye-Bin. Food Science, 2005, 26(2):165-169 成玉梅, 孙鲜明, 康业斌. 食品科学, 2005, 26(2):165-169
24. [24]
  Yoshida S, Muramatsu Y, Tagami K, Uchida S, Ban-Nai T, Yonehara H, Sahoo S. J. Environ. Radioact., 2000, 50(1):161-172
25. [25]
  Casacuberta N, Lehritani M, Mantero J, Masqué P, Garcia-Orellana J, Garcia-Tenorio R. Appl. Radiat. Isot., 2012, 70(4):568-573
26. [26]
  Horwitz E P, Dietz M L, Chiarizia R, Diamond H, Essling A M, Graczyk D. Anal. Chim. Acta, 1992, 266(1):25-37
27. [27]
  Ko Y G, Lim J M, Lee H, Chung K H, Kang M J. React. Funct. Polym., 2016, 106:43-50
28. [28]
  Currie L A. Pure Appl. Chem., 1995, 67(10):1699-1723
29. [29]
  Grinberg P, Willie S, Sturgeon R E. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 2005, 20(8):717-723
30. [30]
  WU Tao, KANG Hou-Jun, SHI Zheng-Kun. Phs. Test. Chem. Anal., Part B, 2013, (02):219-221 吴涛, 康厚军, 石正坤. 理化检验(化学分册), 2013, (02):219-221
31. [31]
  Yoshida S, Muramatsu Y. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 1997, 67(1-4):49-58

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 12
文章访问数: 546
HTML全文浏览量: 122

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

植物样品中低水平铀同位素分析

English

Determination of Low Level Uranium Isotopes in Vegetation Samples

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

植物样品中低水平铀同位素分析

English

Determination of Low Level Uranium Isotopes in Vegetation Samples

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs