B and Fe co-doped Co2P hollow nanocubes for nitrate electroreduction to ammonia

Jing Miao Qingling Hong Liping Liang Guomin Li Zhihong Liu Shibin Yin Yu Chen

Citation:  Jing Miao, Qingling Hong, Liping Liang, Guomin Li, Zhihong Liu, Shibin Yin, Yu Chen. B and Fe co-doped Co2P hollow nanocubes for nitrate electroreduction to ammonia[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(2): 108935. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108935 shu

B and Fe co-doped Co2P hollow nanocubes for nitrate electroreduction to ammonia

English

  • Ammonia (NH3) not only acts as a critical industrial raw chemical in the agriculture, textile, pharmaceutical and plastic industries, but also serves as an emissions-less and efficient energy carrier [1,2]. Compared with the traditional Haber-Bosch process at high pressures and high temperatures, the electrochemical synthesis method can provide an environmentally friendly and energy-efficient approach for large-scale NH3 production [3]. At present, nitrogen electroreduction reaction suffer from the highly stable N≡N triple bond (ca. 941 kJ/mol) as well as unsatisfactory Faradaic efficiency [4]. In contrast, the nitrate (NO3) electroreduction reaction (NO3RR) is considered as an attractive electrochemical method for NH3 production because of the high solubility of NO3 in water and the small dissociation energy of N═O double bond (ca. 204 kJ/mol) [5-7]. In fact, NO3 pollution in drinking water causes severe problems to human health, which mainly originates from the excessive use of nitrogen-containing fertilizer and the improper discharge of wastewater [8,9]. From the energy-saving and environmental protection perspectives, thus, NO3RR is highly attractive to harness NO3 contamination to produce valuable NH3. However, the competing hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and complex eight-electron transfer process may lead to the low NH3 yield and selectivity [10,11].

    Recently, transition metal phosphides (TMPs) are attractive electrocatalyst because of their low-cost, impressive activity and positive reduction potential for NO3RR [12-14]. To achieve high activity, selectivity, and durability of TMPs electrocatalysts for NO3RR, many efforts have been devoted to exquisitely control their morphology, optimize their chemical composition, and modify their electronic structure [15,16]. For example, Li and co-workers successfully synthesized Fe-doped CoP nanohoops, which revealed improved NO3RR activity compared to CoP nanohoops due to electronic regulation function of Fe atoms [17]. Among various nanostructures with different morphologies, hollow nanostructures can offer great benefits for boosting their electrocatalytic performance, which efficiently provide more exposed active sites and shorten the charge transport pathways [18-21]. In additional, boron (B) doping is an efficient approach to boost the intrinsic activity of transition element-based nanostructures for various electrocatalytic reactions, such as B-doped Fe7S8/FeS2 electrocatalysts for alkaline HER [22], B doped cobalt oxide nanocrystals for oxygen evolution reaction [23], and B, P co-doped Pd nanothorn arrays for NO3RR [24]. Mainly, B atoms can well rearrange the inhomogeneous spin and charge density of metal atoms, originating from the easy coordination with metal atoms [25]. Inspired by this, it is highly desired to synthesize B-doped porous TMPs nanostructures for the NO3RR.

    In this work, we successfully synthesized B and Fe co-doped Co2P hollow nanocubes (B/Fe-Co2P HNCs) and further investigated the NO3RR performance. The introduction of electron-deficient B atoms could efficiently rearrange the electronic structure of Fe-Co2P HNCs. Besides, the hollow and porous architecture could provide high surface area, abundant active sites and available mass transfer pathways. Benefiting from the hollow nanostructures, well-defined void space, and tunable chemical compositions, B/Fe-Co2P HNCs exhibited an outstanding selectivity, activity, stability for the NO3 to NH3 conversion in neutral Na2SO4 electrolyte. B/Fe-Co2P HNCs with long-term stability and high activity provide a facile strategy for synthesis NH3 and elimination of NO3 contamination.

    B/Fe-Co2P HCNs were synthesized though successive precipitation transformation and boronation-phosphidation methods, as illustrated in Scheme 1. Prussian blue analogues (PBAs) are recognized as popular precursor for TMPs synthesis because of their tunable chemical composition, large specific surface areas, and high porosity [26].

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  The synthetic strategy of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs.

    First, CoFe-PBA HNCs were easily synthesized through coprecipitation method (see experimental section in Supporting information for the detail). Both the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization show that CoFe-PBA HNCs have a well-defined cubic morphology, uniform size (ca. 300–400 nm) and smooth surface (Fig. S1 in Supporting information). In X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization, all diffraction peaks are well indexed to K2CoFe(CN)6 crystal (JCPDS No. 75–0038) (Fig. S2 in Supporting information). Thus, SEM and XRD characterization confirm the successful synthesis of CoFe-PBA HNCs. After simultaneous boronation-phosphorization process, the energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) characterization displays the co-existence of B, Fe, Co and P elements whereas K and N elements of PBA are not observed (Fig. 1a). The XRD pattern of as-prepared sample matches well with Co2P crystal (JCPDS No. 32–0306) and the characteristic peak of PBA precursor disappear completely (Fig. 1b). Thus, we can be concluded that PBA is completely converted into B/Fe-Co2P HNCs. For comparison, Fe-Co2P HNCs without B-doping were synthesized by phosphorization treatment (Fig. S3 in Supporting information). Compared with Fe-Co2P HNCs, the main diffraction peaks of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs shift positively, which can be attributed to B doping [27,28]. According to nitrogen adsorption-desorption test, the surface area of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs is 42.4 m2/g (Fig. 1c), suggesting that the hollow porous B/Fe-Co2P HNCs can offer ample accessible active sites. Meanwhile, B/Fe-Co2P HNCs show a smaller contact angle compared to Fe-Co2P HNCs (Fig. 1d), indicating that the introduction of B atoms can provide superhydrophilic surface. The superhydrophilic surface can facilitate electrolyte adsorption and electron transfer processes [24].

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  (a) EDX spectrum, (b) XRD pattern, and (c) nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs, (d) the contact angle of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs and Fe-Co2P HNCs.

    The hard template strategy can generally preserve the initial morphology of precursor. During the boronation-phosphorization process, CoFe-PBA HNCs are easily decomposed into lesser broken cubes with the rough and porous feature, indicating that CoFe-PBA HNCs are successfully converted into B/Fe-Co2P HNCs (Figs. 2a and b). By adjusting the mass ratio of B and P, B/Fe-Co2P HNCs with different B/P mass ratio can also be obtained (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). TEM image clearly reveals the regular and large interior spaces within ultrafine nanoparticles embedded in the outer face (Fig. 2c). High-resolution TEM image distinctly reveals the lattice fringes of 0.175 and 0.221 nm (Fig. 2d), corresponding to (020) and (112) planes of Co2P [29,30]. Elemental mapping characterization shows that Co, P, B, and Fe elements are homogeneously distributed on the nanocubes (Fig. 2e), confirming the B and Fe co-doping, again.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (a, b) SEM images, (c) TEM image, (d) high-resolution TEM image, and (e) EDX elemental mapping images of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs.

    The surface component and valence state of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs were examined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In the Co 2p spectrum (Fig. 3a), the peaks at 795.5 and 780.1 eV correspond to 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 orbits of Co2+ species, and the peaks at 797.2 and 782.1 eV are attributed to 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 orbits of Co3+ species. The two broad peaks at 785.6 and 802.5 eV are assigned to the satellite peaks [31,32]. In the Fe 2p spectrum (Fig. 3b), two peaks at 724.5 and 710.7 eV can be ascribed to 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 orbits of Fe2+ species, whereas the peaks at 727.6 and 713.3 eV correspond to 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 orbits of Fe3+ species, along with two shakeup satellite peaks at 717.7 and 733.3 eV [33,34]. Particularly, the binding energies of Co 2p and Fe 2p negatively shift after B doping (Fig. S5 in Supporting information), suggesting the electron interaction between metal atom and B atom because of the electron-deficient nature of B [35,36]. In the B 1s spectrum (Fig. 3c), the peak at 187.8 eV correspond to the peak of metallic B [37]. The peaks at higher binding energy (194.8 eV, 196.2 eV) correspond to the oxidic boron species [38,39]. In the P 2p spectrum (Fig. 3d), the huge peak of 133.9 eV belongs to P-O, and the two peaks at 129.3 and 130.4 eV can be ascribed to TMPs, which is constant with reported TMPs nanostructures [40,41].

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (a) Co 2p, (b) Fe 2p, (c) B 1s, and (d) P 2p XPS spectra of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs.

    The NO3RR performance of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs and Fe-Co2P HNCs were investigated in 0.5 mol/L Na2SO4 electrolyte with and without 50 mmol/L NaNO3. Both Fe-Co2P HNCs and B/Fe-Co2P HNCs display an obvious electroactivity for NO3RR, reflecting the cathodic current markedly increases after the addition of NO3 into 0.5 mol/L Na2SO4 electrolyte. Compared with Fe-Co2P HNCs without B doping, B/Fe-Co2P HNCs exhibit a more positive onset potential and a bigger reduction peak current density for NO3RR, implying the outstanding NO3RR catalytic activity (Fig. 4a). This phenomenon further suggests that the intrinsic NO3RR activity of Fe-Co2P HNCs is significantly enhanced after B doping. Since XPS measurements show the introduction of B atoms can efficiently regulate the electronic structure of Fe-Co2P HNCs, the electronic effect is responsible for intrinsic activity enhancement of Fe-Co2P HNCs due to B doping. Among B/Fe-Co2P HNCs with different B/P ratio, B/Fe-Co2P HNCs (B: P = 2:1) has the highest NO3RR (Fig. S6 in Supporting information), which in turn confirms that both B and P atoms have obvious influence on NO3RR activity enhancement. To study the activity and selectivity of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs for NO3RR, the reactant and reductive products were determined by the chronoamperometry tests at various applied potentials. After chronoamperometry tests for 3 h, colorimetric methods were used to quantity the NH3 yields and Faradaic efficiency (Figs. S7 and S8 in Supporting information). Upon varying the applied potential from −0.5 V to −0.9 V (vs. RHE), the NH3 production rate and conversion rate of NO3RR at B/Fe-Co2P HNCs gradually increase, while the Faradaic efficiency of NH3 at B/Fe-Co2P HNCs displays a volcanic shape (Fig. 4b), similar to Fe-Co2P HNCs (Fig. S9 in Supporting information). Compared with Fe-Co2P HNCs, B/Fe-Co2P HNCs displays larger NH3 production rate and Faradaic efficiency under same potential. For example, B/Fe-Co2P HNCs can achieve the NH3 yield of 22.67 mg h−1 mgcat−1 and the Faradaic efficiency of 97.54% at −0.70 V potential (Fig. 4c), much higher than that of Fe-Co2P HNCs, suggesting high activity and selectivity of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs for the NO3 to NH3 conversion. The control experiment performed in 0.5 mol/L Na2SO4 electrolyte only generates negligible NH3, excluding the interference of catalysts and environmental contaminants (Fig. S10 in Supporting information). Impressively, B/Fe-Co2P HNCs have higher NH3 yield and Faradaic efficiency than most previously reported non-precious metal electrocatalysts for NO3RR (Table S1 in Supporting information), further demonstrating the high electroactivity of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) characterization displays that the charge transfer resistance of NO3RR at B/Fe-Co2P HNCs (49.3 Ω) is much smaller than that at Fe-Co2P HNCs (125 Ω), suggesting that the B doping accelerates the reaction kinetics of NO3RR (Fig. 4d) [24].

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (a) LSV curves of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs and Fe-Co2P HNCs in 0.5 mol/L Na2SO4 with and without 50 mmol/L NaNO3 at 5 mV/s. (b) Faradaic efficiency and NH3 yield rate of NO3RR at B/Fe-Co2P HNCs at different potentials. (c) the NH3 yield rates of NO3RR at B/Fe-Co2P HNCs and Fe-Co2P HNCs. (d) Nyquist plots of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs and Fe-Co2P HNCs.

    Benefiting from the small particle size and porous structure, B/Fe-Co2P HNCs can provide a high surface area and expose affluent active sites, facilitating the NO3 to NH3 conversion [42,43]. The electrochemical double-layer capacitances (Cdl) are estimated via cycling voltammetry (CV) curves under different scan rates (Fig. S11 in Supporting information). The Cdl value (22.41 mF/cm2) of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs is close to that of Fe-Co2P HNCs (21.87 mF/cm2), indicating that the electrochemical active surface area of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs is close to that of Fe-Co2P HNCs. Thus, the area effect is not a main factor for activity enhancement of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs. In fact, the doped B atoms can act as Lewis acid active sites to better adsorb NO3, which accelerates the electroreduction of NO3 to NH3 [23,44]. Meanwhile, B/Fe-Co2P HNCs show a smaller contact angle compared to Fe-Co2P HNCs, indicating that the introduction of B atoms can provide superhydrophilic surface [45]. Additionally, B doping can effectively optimize the charge density and redistribute the inhomogeneous spin, which is favorable for adsorption kinetics and reduce the reaction energy barrier during NO3RR [46,47]. As a result, B/Fe-Co2P exhibits extremely outstanding NO3RR electroactivity.

    Furthermore, the durability of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs was investigated by chronoamperometry test. Chronoamperometric curve reveals that B/Fe-Co2P HNCs can be sustained for 30 h with negligible decay during NO3RR, revealing the excellent stability and practical application for electrochemical NH3 production (Fig. 5a). After long-time electrolysis, EDX, XRD and TEM characterizations display that chemical composition, morphology and structure remain nearly unchanged, revealing stability of B/Fe-Co2P toward NO3RR (Figs. 5b-d).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  (a) Chronoamperometric curve of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs in 0.5 mol/L Na2SO4 + 0.05 mol/L NaNO3 electrolyte at −0.70 V potential. (b) EDX spectrum, (c) XRD pattern, and (d) TEM image of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs after chronoamperometry test.

    In summary, we have rationally designed and synthesized B/Fe-Co2P HCNs with an open structure and unique hollow interior. Thanks to superhydrophilic surface and abundant active sites, the obtained B/Fe-Co2P HCNs show excellent electrocatalytic activity for NO3 to NH3 conversion. B/Fe-Co2P HCNs show an impressive NH3 production rate of 22.67 mg h−1 mgcat−1 and Faradaic efficiency of 97.54%, much superior to the most reported non-precious metal NO3RR electrocatalysts in neutral media. This work not only highlights a new boronation-phosphorization way for the nanomaterials synthesis but also points out the high-performance of B/Fe-Co2P HCNs for NO3 removal and NH3 synthesis.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (No. 202203021222213), Taiyuan University of Science and Technology Scientific Research Initial Funding (No. 20222091), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22073061), Science and Technology Innovation Team of Shaanxi Province (No. 2023-CX-TD-27), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. GK202202001).

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108935.


    1. [1]

      D.F. Qi, F. Lv, T.R. Wei, et al., Nano Res. Energy 1 (2022) e9120022. doi: 10.26599/NRE.2022.9120022

    2. [2]

      Z.B. Yao, S.Q. Liu, H.H. Liu, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 (2022) 2209843.

    3. [3]

      J. Liang, Q. Liu, A.A. Alshehri, et al., Nano Res. Energy 1 (2022) e9120010. doi: 10.26599/NRE.2022.9120010

    4. [4]

      Y.M. Huang, J. Long, Y.T. Wang, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 (2021) 54967–54973. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c15206

    5. [5]

      Z.X. Ge, T.J. Wang, Y. Ding, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 12 (2022) 2103916. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202103916

    6. [6]

      Y. Xu, M.Z. Wang, K.L. Ren, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 9 (2021) 16411–16417. doi: 10.1039/D1TA04743D

    7. [7]

      Q.L. Hong, B.Q. Miao, T.J. Wang, et al., Energy Lab 1 (2023) 220022.

    8. [8]

      Y.T. Wang, W. Zhou, R.R. Jia, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 5350–5354. doi: 10.1002/anie.201915992

    9. [9]

      Q. Li, Y.N. Liu, Z. Wan, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 3835–3841. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.025

    10. [10]

      Q.F. Yao, J.B. Chen, S.Z. Xiao, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 (2021) 30458–30467. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c22338

    11. [11]

      J.M. Cai, Y.Y. Wei, A. Cao, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 316 (2022) 121683. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121683

    12. [12]

      G.L. Wen, J. Liang, Q. Liu, et al., Nano Res. 15 (2022) 9972–9977.

    13. [13]

      Q.L. Hong, J. Zhou, Q.G. Zhai, et al., Chem. Commun. 57 (2021) 11621–11624. doi: 10.1039/D1CC04952F

    14. [14]

      C.M. Li, D.Q. Zhu, S.S. Cheng, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 1141–1153. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.057

    15. [15]

      S.H. Ye, Z.D. Chen, G.K. Zhang, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 15 (2022) 760. doi: 10.1039/D1EE03097C

    16. [16]

      S.L. Chen, H. Jang, J. Wang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 8 (2020) 2099. doi: 10.1039/C9TA10524G

    17. [17]

      Q.L. Hong, Z.N. Zhang, X.H. Wang, et al., Inorg. Chem. 61 (2022) 4397–14402.

    18. [18]

      N.Y. Wei, M.Y. Mao, J. Wu, et al., Fuel 319 (2022) 123637. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123637

    19. [19]

      M.X. Chen, F.T. Kong, H.L. Yao, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 45 (2023) 139820.

    20. [20]

      Y. Wang, Y.Z. Wang, H.W. Gao, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 451 (2023) 138515. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138515

    21. [21]

      Y.L. Yang, Y.R. Wang, G.K. Gao, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 1439–1444. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.063

    22. [22]

      J. Wu, Q. Zhang, K. Shen, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (2022) 2107802. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202107802

    23. [23]

      M.Q. Yu, C. Weidenthaler, Y. Wang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202211543. doi: 10.1002/anie.202211543

    24. [24]

      Y. Xu, Y.W. Sheng, M.Z. Wang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 1 (2022) 16290.

    25. [25]

      K. Deng, W.X. Wang, Q.Q. Mao, et al., Small 18 (2022) 2203020. doi: 10.1002/smll.202203020

    26. [26]

      G.X. Zhang, Y.L. Li, X. Xiao, et al., Nano Lett. 21 (2021) 3016–3025. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00179

    27. [27]

      S.H. Wang, P. Wang, X.F. Sun, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 297 (2021) 120386. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120386

    28. [28]

      Y. Lin, K. Sun, X.M. Chen, et al., J. Energy Chem. 55 (2021) 92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.06.073

    29. [29]

      Y. Xu, J. Mo, J.F. Long, et al., J. Energy Chem. 73 (2022) 322–329. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.06.018

    30. [30]

      X.J. Zhao, T.Q. Gao, W.H. Ren, et al., J. Energy Chem. 75 (2022) 250–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.08.033

    31. [31]

      Q. Liu, L.S. Xie, J. Liang, et al., Small 18 (2022) 2106961. doi: 10.1002/smll.202106961

    32. [32]

      Y. Jia, Y.G. Ji, Q. Xue, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 (2021) 45521–45527. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c12512

    33. [33]

      J. Miao, X.J. Zhao, H.Y. Hu, et al., ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 5 (2022) 4948–4957.

    34. [34]

      Q.M. Chen, Q.C. Zhang, H.B. Liu, et al., Small 17 (2021) 2007858. doi: 10.1002/smll.202007858

    35. [35]

      F.L. Gou, H. Wang, M.M. Fu, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 612 (2023) 155872. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155872

    36. [36]

      Y.H. Li, H.J. Yu, Z.Q. Wang, et al., Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 14745–14748. doi: 10.1039/C9CC07232B

    37. [37]

      Z.Q. Wang, M. Li, P. Wang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 449 (2022) 137771. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137771

    38. [38]

      F.G. Wang, B. Liu, H.Y. Wang, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 610 (2022) 173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.031

    39. [39]

      W.J. Jiang, S. Niu, T. Tang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 1–7. doi: 10.1002/anie.201610955

    40. [40]

      G. Ma, N. Yang, Y.F. Xue, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 (2021) 42763–42772. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c10971

    41. [41]

      J. Wang, H. Cheng, S.Y. Ren, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 8 (2020) 16018–16023. doi: 10.1039/D0TA03736B

    42. [42]

      X.Y. Zhang, G. Ma, L.L. Shui, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 430 (2022) 132666. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132666

    43. [43]

      H.Y. Zhou, B.Y. Xiong, L.S. Chen, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 8 (2020) 20286. doi: 10.1039/D0TA06776H

    44. [44]

      B. Chang, L.L. Li, D. Shi, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 283 (2021) 119622. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119622

    45. [45]

      R.Q. Guo, J.L. Shi, K.W. Ma, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 651 (2023) 172–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.176

    46. [46]

      B.B. Fan, H.Z. Wang, H. Zhang, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (2022) 2110783. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202110783

    47. [47]

      F.G. Wang, B. Li, Z.Y. Lin, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 592 (2022) 153245. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153245

  • Scheme 1  The synthetic strategy of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs.

    Figure 1  (a) EDX spectrum, (b) XRD pattern, and (c) nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs, (d) the contact angle of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs and Fe-Co2P HNCs.

    Figure 2  (a, b) SEM images, (c) TEM image, (d) high-resolution TEM image, and (e) EDX elemental mapping images of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs.

    Figure 3  (a) Co 2p, (b) Fe 2p, (c) B 1s, and (d) P 2p XPS spectra of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs.

    Figure 4  (a) LSV curves of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs and Fe-Co2P HNCs in 0.5 mol/L Na2SO4 with and without 50 mmol/L NaNO3 at 5 mV/s. (b) Faradaic efficiency and NH3 yield rate of NO3RR at B/Fe-Co2P HNCs at different potentials. (c) the NH3 yield rates of NO3RR at B/Fe-Co2P HNCs and Fe-Co2P HNCs. (d) Nyquist plots of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs and Fe-Co2P HNCs.

    Figure 5  (a) Chronoamperometric curve of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs in 0.5 mol/L Na2SO4 + 0.05 mol/L NaNO3 electrolyte at −0.70 V potential. (b) EDX spectrum, (c) XRD pattern, and (d) TEM image of B/Fe-Co2P HNCs after chronoamperometry test.

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  1
  • 文章访问数:  169
  • HTML全文浏览量:  9
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2024-02-15
  • 收稿日期:  2023-06-08
  • 接受日期:  2023-08-15
  • 修回日期:  2023-08-12
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-08-17
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章