English

• Rosmarinic acid (RA) is a natural phenolic acid containing several phenolic hydroxyl groups [1]. It is widely found in Lamiaceae plants, such as Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge, Rosmarinus officinalis, and Perilla frutescens [2]. RA has been found to have antioxidant, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities [3-5], which is a valuable candidate product for inclusion in functional foods and pharmaceutical plant products. In addition, RA is expected to be effective in preventing Alzheimer's disease due to its inhibition of amyloid-β aggregation [6]. These various application prospects contribute to the great interest in RA component. In order to facilitate the subsequent applications, a series of techniques for the determination of RA have been reported, including high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [7], liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) [8], ultraviolet spectrophotometry [9] and capillary electrophoresis (CE) [10]. Among the mentioned methods, the HPLC method is frequently used for the quantification of RA because of its excellent separation efficiency, accuracy and sensitivity. Unfortunately, it still has some inherent limitations, such as cumbersome sample pre-processing, reliance on large instruments and technical requirements for instrument operators. The development of analytical methods with simple operation, free of complex instrumentation, good selectivity and high sensitivity is a hot spot in current research.

  Sensor detection is a method of qualitative or quantitative analysis of the target by converting the recognized signal into other various signals and outputting them. It has many excellent features, including miniature equipment, high sensitivity, good selectivity, simple operation and rapid response. In recent years, this method has shown great potential in the fields of environmental monitoring, food analysis, and biomedicine [11-14]. As we all know, fluorescence sensor is regarded as one of the most sensitive analysis tools, and has a considerable research foundation [15-17]. The excitation light source of traditional down-conversion fluorescence is ultraviolet light, having the drawbacks of background interference, short lifetime and easy photo drift, thus its development is hindered greatly. As a meaningful alternative, up-conversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) have attracted more and more attention and have been widely used in the fluorescence sensor [18-20]. UCNPs usually transform low-energy light into high-energy light. The biological sample absorbs less of this low-energy infrared light, which can effectively avoid the fluorescence interference of the biological sample itself. Therefore, this material has the advantages of non-autofluorescence, non-photobleaching and low damage to biological tissues, which is unique in the field of biosensing and bioimaging [21-23]. Regrettably, the readout of the fluorescence signal is also directly dependent on sophisticated instrumentation, thus unsatisfied with the demands of portable detection. Furthermore, analysis by single signal changes may be susceptible to incidental factors such as instrument efficiency, operating and measurement conditions, and unstable biological environments. To achieve portable and sensitive probes, several research groups have proposed the analysis strategy of constructing a multi-mode sensing platform [24-26]. Colorimetric sensors and photothermal sensors provide important avenues for this strategy. The colorimetric sensor is based on the color shade of colored substance to achieve the determination of component content [27,28]. Since the color change can be observed by the naked eye, it has the advantage of direct readout and simplicity. Colorless 3, 3′, 5, 5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) is a relatively safe and stable chromogen reagent, which can be oxidized to blue oxidized 3, 3′, 5, 5′-tetramethylbenzidine (oxTMB). Studies have confirmed that TMB has been widely used in colorimetric detection [29,30]. Photothermal sensors can be realized by using the photothermal effect of substances [31]. After the substance is irradiated with near-infrared (NIR) light, the temperature will change. The content of the target component can be determined by measuring the temperature change of the substance solution. Photothermal readout only requires a portable thermometer and a NIR laser without complex control equipment, which greatly reduces development costs and the complexity of the analysis process. Therefore, photothermal detection through thermometer readout plays an important role in point-of-care detection [27]. oxTMB has been widely demonstrated to be a novel photothermal probe. It is simple and easy to obtain without any tedious preparation process, and has been applied to some photothermal sensors [31,32]. Therefore, the multi-signal sensing platform that integrates fluorescent signal with colorimetric signal and photothermal signal can combine the advantages of different single-signal technologies to meet the requirements of sensitive, visible, and portable detection. Moreover, the methods can be validated against each other to further provide reliable and accurate quantitative results.

  In this work, a new up-conversion fluorescence, colorimetric and photothermal multi-modal analysis method for the quantification of RA has been developed. The principle of the sensing system is shown in Scheme 1. β-Cyclodextrin (CD) modified citric acid (Cit) coated NaYF₄:Yb/Er-Cit-CD (Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD) up-conversion nanocomposite has been synthesized and has good dispersibility in water. Under 980 nm NIR irradiation, Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD emits green fluorescence with a spectral peak of about 550 nm. The emission spectrum partially overlapped with the absorption spectrum of oxTMB. Therefore, the green fluorescence of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD can be effectively quenched by the oxTMB because of the fluorescence inner filter effect (IFE). When RA is introduced, the blue oxTMB is reduced to colorless TMB. Since the absence of IFE between TMB and Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD, up-conversion fluorescence is recovered and sensitive fluorescence detection is achieved. At the same time, the decrease in absorbance of the system can be easily observed with naked eye due to the color indication of oxTMB. In addition, oxTMB also has the photothermal effect, converting light to heat under 808 nm laser irradiation and reading out the photothermal signal by measuring the change in system temperature with a thermometer. Based on this principle, a new sensitive, visible and convenient method for the detection of RA is provided, and applied successfully to the detection of RA in food samples.

  Scheme 1

  

  Scheme 1.  Schematic diagram of the Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB sensor for RA detection.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Y:Yb/Er has been synthesized by the high-temperature solvothermal method. The produced Y:Yb/Er-OA is hydrophobic because its surface has been covered with OA. When Y:Yb/Er-OA has been converted into hydrophilic, the Cit-CD coating is encapsulated with the help of EDC/NHS to improve the dispersibility of nanoparticles in water. Fig. 1 shows the TEM, HRTEM, EDX and XRD images of Y:Yb/Er. As displayed in Fig. 1a, the obtained Y:Yb/Er nanoparticles are monodisperse in chloroform and the shape is close to hexagonal with a size of about 23 nm. From Fig. 1b, the lattice stripes of Y:Yb/Er can be clearly seen with a stripe spacing of 0.23 nm, corresponding to the (111) plane of hexagonal β-Y:Yb/Er. The EDX spectrum of Y:Yb/Er is exhibited in Fig. 1c, and the characteristic peaks of Na, Y, F, Yb, C and O elements are clearly observed (due to the low amount of Er element, there is no eyeable peak in the spectrum). Fig. 1d displays the XRD pattern of Y:Yb/Er, demonstrating that the nanoparticles are primarily consisted of hexagonal phase. The above results indicate the successful synthesis of Y:Yb/Er. Then, the prepared Cit-CD has been characterized by spectrophotometer and Fourier transform infrared spectrometer. The UV-vis absorption spectra of Cit, CD, Cit + CD and Cit-CD are shown in Fig. 2a. Black curve represents Cit, which has a pronounced absorption at 234 nm. Red curve represents CD, with a weak absorption peak at 215 nm. Blue curve represents Cit + CD, whose absorption spectrum is similar to Cit and is a simple superposition of Cit and CD. Green curve represents Cit-CD, which has an absorption peak at 200 nm and it is clearly distinct from the spectra of the three substances as-mentioned. The FT-IR spectra of Cit, CD, and Cit-CD have been analyzed as shown in Fig. 2b. Blue curve represents Cit, and the characteristic band at 1717 cm⁻¹ originates from the stretching vibration of the C=O bond. Black curve represents CD, and the absorption bands at 3390 cm⁻¹ and 1027 cm⁻¹ are attributed to the stretching vibration of the O-H bond and the stretching vibration of the C-O bond, respectively. Red curve represents Cit-CD, and the absorption bands at 3408 cm⁻¹ and 1726 cm⁻¹ result from the stretching vibration of the O-H bond and the stretching vibration of the C=O bond, respectively. These data have indicated that Cit and CD are well connected to obtain Cit-CD. And the combined yield of Cit and CD has been calculated to be about 92.25%.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  (a) TEM, (b) HRTEM, (c) EDX and (d) XRD patterns of Y:Yb/Er.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  (a) UV–vis absorption spectra of Cit, CD, Cit + CD and Cit-CD. (b) FT-IR spectra of Cit, CD, and Cit-CD. (c) UV–vis absorption spectra of Cit-CD, Y:Yb/Er, Y:Yb/Er + Cit-CD and Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD. (d) FT-IR spectra of Cit-CD, Y:Yb/Er, and Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD. (e) EDX pattern and (f) TEM image of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD. (g) STEM image of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD and corresponding elemental mapping images.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Subsequently, the UV-vis absorption spectrum, FT-IR spectrum, EDX pattern, TEM image and major element mapping of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD have been measured. Fig. 2c illustrates the UV-vis absorption spectra of Cit-CD, Y:Yb/Er, Y:Yb/Er + Cit-CD and Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD. The absorption spectrum of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD (green curve) is different from the Cit-CD (black curve), Y:Yb/Er (red curve) and the simple mixture of these two substances (blue curve). Then, Fig. 2d displayed the FT-IR spectra of Y:Yb/Er, Cit-CD and Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD. Compared with the spectrum of Y:Yb/Er (black curve), the 1715 cm⁻¹ characteristic peak of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD (red curve) has represented the stretching vibration of the C=O bonds of Cit in Cit-CD. The 1108 cm⁻¹ characteristic band can belong to the stretching vibration of the C-O single bond in Cit-CD. The EDX pattern of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD in Fig. 2e illustrates that the peak heights of Na and C elements are apparently different from the Y:Yb/Er. As shown in Fig. 2f, Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD is uniformly wrapped with the Cit-CD shell layer, which is about 25 nm in size and slightly larger than Y:Yb/Er. Besides, Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD has good dispersibility in aqueous solution. The STEM image and main elemental mapping images of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD have been tested in Fig. 2g. O, F, Y, Yb and Er elements are homogeneously distributed in the Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD nanocomposite, with the largest amount of O elements, further demonstrating that Cit-CD is uniformly encapsulated on the surface of Y:Yb/Er. Besides, the synthesized MnO₂ has been identified by TEM image and XRD pattern. As seen in Fig. S1a (Support information), the MnO₂ exhibits a uniform and transparent thin-layer flake structure, and its crystal structure is shown in Fig. S1b (Support information). The obtained results are consistent with the reference method [33].

  According to the principle of the IFE, when the emission spectrum of fluorophore roughly overlaps with the absorption spectrum of absorbing substance, resulting in weaker fluorescence intensity of fluorophore [34-36]. As shown in Fig. 3a, curve a represents the fluorescence emission spectrum of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD under 980 nm NIR radiation. The green characteristic band of Er³⁺ centered at 550 nm is derived from ⁴S_3/2→⁴I_15/2 transition. Curve c shows the absorption spectrum of TMB and almost no absorption. However, when TMB is oxidized to oxTMB (curve b) with MnO₂ nanosheets, there is a UV-vis absorption peak region at 550–750 nm. One can clearly see the absorption band of oxTMB overlapping with the fluorescence emission band of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD, providing the conditions for fluorescence quenching. Fig. 3b shows that the absence and presence of oxTMB (0.25 mmol/L) have almost no effect on the fluorescence decay life for ⁴S_3/2→⁴I_15/2 transition of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD. This result has suggested that fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is not the reason of quenching. Then, the absorbance of oxTMB is almost unchanged in the presence of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD (Fig. S2 in Supporting information), which rules out static quenching induced by the formation of non-luminescent ground-state complexes between the phosphor and the quencher. Based on the above phenomena, we have speculated that the explanation for fluorescence quenching can be attributed to the IFE induced by the absorption of emitted light from Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD by oxTMB, which is consistent with the reported literature [34,36,37]. Fig. 3c further shows the energy transfer of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD under 980 nm NIR radiation and the IFE mechanism of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB system. First, Yb³⁺ ions are pumped from the ground state (²F_7/2) to the excited state (²F_5/2) by absorbing photons. Then, energy transfers from Yb³⁺ to Er³⁺ ions through three pathways, with the ⁴I_11/2, ⁴F_9/2 and ⁴F_7/2 energy levels being populated. Er³⁺ ions can be excited from ⁴I_11/2 state to ⁴F_7/2 state. The ⁴F_7/2 level decays non-radiatively to the ⁴S_3/2 level, which is followed by the ⁴S_3/2→⁴I_15/2 transition leading to the characteristic green emission of Er³⁺ at 550 nm. When quencher oxTMB is added, the ⁴S_3/2 state energy emission of Er³⁺ is absorbed by oxTMB, leading to quenching of the fluorophore green fluorescence.

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  (a) The fluorescence emission spectrum of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD and the UV–vis absorption spectrum of oxTMB and TMB. The insets are corresponding fluorescent visualizations and solution color photographs. (b) The decay dynamics for ⁴S_3/2→⁴I_15/2 transition of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD without and with of oxTMB (250 µmol/L). (c) The excitation and IFE mechanism in Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB system.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The feasibility of the triple-signal system for detecting RA has been assessed, and the results are displayed in Fig. 4. First, Fig. 4a shows the fluorescence emission spectra of different components. The fluorescence of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD (red curve) is overtly quenched in the presence of oxTMB (blue Curve). When a certain concentration of RA is mixed in Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB solution, the fluorescence recovered due to the reduction of oxTMB to TMB and the absence of IFE (purple curve). The inset shows the corresponding fluorescence visualization photograph of the different component solutions under the exposure of 980 nm laser, which are consistent with the fluorescence measurements. Then, the UV-vis absorption spectra of different components is shown in Fig. 4b. The Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD solution has no observable absorption in the region of 500–750 nm (red curve), and the solution is almost colorless and transparent. When oxTMB has been added, the Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB solution has a distinct absorption peak at 650 nm (blue curve) and the solution is blue. Following the introduction of RA, the absorption of the solution at 650 nm is weakened (purple curve) and the color of the solution becomes lighter owing to the reduction of oxTMB to TMB. Afterwards, the readout of the photothermal signal has been analyzed based on the good absorption at 808 nm (Fig. 4b) and photothermal effects of oxTMB. The results of the temperature changes of different component solutions under 808 nm laser irradiation are shown in Fig. 4c. Among them, the temperature of the solution containing oxTMB has increased significantly, but no notable changes have been observed in other solutions. These phenomena demonstrate the possibility of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB sensing system to read out RA through the triple-signal of fluorescence, colorimetric and photothermal.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  The (a) fluorescence emission spectra, (b) UV–vis absorption spectra and (c) temperature changes of different components. The insets are the corresponding fluorescent visualization photograph and solution color photograph, respectively.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In order to obtain the best sensing performance for RA, the parameters of the experimental conditions have been divided into two groups to optimize, including fluorescence quenching group and fluorescence recovery group. The fluorescence quenching group of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB relates to the acidity, temperature, time of the reaction between Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD and oxTMB, and the amount of oxTMB. Fig. S3 (Supporting information) shows the optimization results of oxTMB quenching the fluorescence of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD. As displayed in Fig. S3a, the acidity of the reaction has a great effect on the fluorescence intensity of the system at 550 nm. In order to achieve the best quenching effect, pH 5 has been selected as the appropriate acidity for the reaction. Then, the effect of reaction temperature on fluorescence quenching has been investigated with the temperature controlled at 15 ℃ to 60 ℃ (Fig. S3b). The lowest fluorescence intensity is obtained at the reaction temperature of 30 ℃. Therefore, 30 ℃ has been chosen as the optimum reaction temperature. Fig. S3c represents the relationship between reaction time and fluorescence quenching for the addition of oxTMB into Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD system. The fluorescence intensity is minimized and stabilized when the reaction time is 30 min, thus 30 min has been decided as the optimized reaction time. Next, the influence of oxTMB content on the fluorescence quenching of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD has been examined. The oxTMB was prepared by the oxidase (OXD) activity of MnO₂ nanosheets. As shown in Fig. S4a (Supporting information), MnO₂ nanosheets can effectively catalyze the oxidation of TMB into blue oxTMB in a concentration (Fig. S4b in Supporting information) and time (Fig. S4c in Supporting information) dependent manner. Then, the effects of pH condition (Fig. S4d in Supporting information) and reaction temperature (Fig. S4e in Supporting information) on the OXD activity of MnO₂ nanosheets showed that the optimal activity has been obtained at pH 5.0 and 40 ℃. Fig. S4f (Supporting information) shows the typical Michaelis kinetics of TMB catalytic oxidation by MnO₂ nanosheets, with the Michaelis-Menten constant (K_m) is 0.3630 mmol/L and the maximal reaction velocity (V_max) is 6.4475 µmol L⁻¹ s⁻¹ (Fig. S4g in Supporting information). These results indicate that MnO₂ nanosheets exhibit excellent OXD catalytic activity. Subsequently, the quenching efficiency of TMB to Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD has been evaluated with TMB concentrations ranging from 0.025 mmol/L to 0.5 mmol/L (Fig. S4h in Supporting information). With the increases of TMB concentration, the fluorescence quenching efficiency gradually improves, reaching a maximum and stabilizing when the concentration of TMB increases to 0.25 mmol/L. Therefore, 0.25 mmol/L has been preferred as the optimum quenching concentration. The fluorescence recovery group of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB/RA includes the acidity, temperature and time of the incubation for RA detection. As seen in Fig. S5a (Supporting information), the fluorescence intensity can recover to the maximum at pH 7. Fig. S5b (Supporting information) indicates that the fluorescence intensity is brightest when the incubated temperature is maintained at 40 ℃. In Fig. S5c (Supporting information), the result has suggested that the fluorescence intensity gradually enhances with extended incubation time, and the fluorescence intensity reaches the maximum and remains steady when the incubation time extends to 80 min. Therefore, the optimal acidity, incubation temperature and incubation time for the determination of RA are pH 7, 40 ℃ and 80 min, respectively. Besides, the effect of different radiation time of the 808 nm laser on the readout of photothermal signal has also been evaluated. Fig. S5d (Supporting information) shows the temperature changes of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD, Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD + oxTMB and Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD + oxTMB + RA during 10 min irradiation. With the extension of radiation time, Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD + oxTMB (red curve) and Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD + oxTMB + RA (green curve) display visible increases followed by gradual stabilization in temperature, but no obvious change is observed in Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD (black curve). In order to facilitate temperature measurement, 5 min is finally selected as the irradiation time for the subsequent readout of photothermal signal.

  Under optimal conditions, we have evaluated the detection potential of the triple-signal sensing system by including various concentrations of RA. The fluorescence emission spectra at different RA concentrations are shown in Fig. 5a. As the concentration of RA increases sequentially, the fluorescence intensity recovers gradually at 550 nm. The inset visually shows the recovery of the fluorescence intensity and is matched to the fluorescence spectrum. More importantly, there is an excellent linear relationship between fluorescence intensity and RA concentration in the range of 0.01–5 µmol/L (Fig. 5b). The fitted regression equation is F = 337.4X + 1435 (R_F² = 0.9997). According to the 3σ rule, the limit of detection (LOD) for fluorescence is 0.004 µmol/L. Next, Fig. 5c displays that as the concentration of RA increases, the absorption at 650 nm gradually decreases due to the reduction of oxTMB to TMB. The inset displays that the blue of the solution slowly fades, which is consistent with the change in the ultraviolet absorption spectra. From Fig. 5d, the well-linear relationship between UV-vis absorbance and RA concentration in the range of 0.1–6 µmol/L can be seen. The corresponding linear regression equation is A = −0.1309X + 1.150 (R_A² = 0.9951), and the LOD for absorption is 0.036 µmol/L. Afterward, the systems containing various levels of RA have been irradiated with 808 nm laser light for 5 min and the temperature changes have been measured by a thermometer. As can be seen in Fig. 5e, the temperature in the system gradually weakens as the amount of RA increases. And in the range of 0.1–6 µmol/L, there is a well-linear correlation between the temperature variation and the amount of RA (Fig. 5f). The related linear equation is ΔT = −1.728X + 17.77 (R_ΔT² = 0.9932), with a LOD of 0.043 µmol/L.

  Figure 5

  

  Figure 5.  (a) Fluorescence emission spectra of the sensing system in the presence of different RA concentrations. The inset is the fluorescence visualization photograph of the solution under different RA concentrations, from bottom to top are 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 µmol/L. (b) Linear relationship between fluorescence intensity at 550 nm and the concentration of RA (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 µmol/L). (c) UV–vis absorption spectra of sensing system with different RA concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 µmol/L). The inset is the color photograph of the system at different RA concentrations. (d) Linear relationship between absorbance at 650 nm and the concentration of RA (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 µmol/L). (e) Temperature of sensing system with different RA concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 µmol/L) after 808 nm laser irradiation for 5 min. (f) Linear relationship between the temperature change after 808 nm laser irradiation for 5 min and the concentration of RA (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 µmol/L).

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Furthermore, the RA detection performance of this test triple-signal sensor is compared with reported methods, as shown in Table S1 (Supporting information). The comparison shows that the triple-signal sensing system has a lower LOD than most methods, indicating its excellent responsiveness. Significantly, our triple-signal readout analysis method of fluorescence, colorimetric and photothermal not only combines the synergistic benefits of sensitivity, visibility and portability, but the three modes can also be validated against each other to provide more reliable results.

  Possible co-existing substances have been analyzed to evaluate the specificity of the Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB sensing system for the detection of RA. In Fig. 6a, the fluorescence intensity of the solution is significantly enhanced by the introduction of RA, while the change is weak in the presence of interfering substances. Then, Fig. 6b expresses that the variations caused by interfering substances are slight compared to the significant decrease in the absorbance induced by RA. Moreover, from Fig. 6c, it can be seen that the temperature increment of the system drops measurably in the presence of the target RA, but no effect on weakening the temperature increment is observed for other interfering substances. Therefore, these results have demonstrated that the triple-signal sensor has performed excellent selectivity for the determination of RA.

  Figure 6

  

  Figure 6.  (a) Fluorescence intensity response, (b) absorbance response and (c) temperature change of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB sensing system in the presence of foreign substances.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The sensing system has been investigated to detect RA in real samples, and the results are compared with HPLC (Table 1). Except for Perilla drink and Perilla green plum wine where RA is not detected, the levels of RA detected in the real samples ranged from 0.2209 µmol/L to 1.3179 µmol/L. The detection results of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB sensing system are consistent with the HPLC results. The test results after adding different concentrations of RA (0.5, 2, 4 µmol/L) to Perilla drink and Perilla green plum wine are shown in Table S2 (Supporting information). The relative standard deviations (RSD) of the test results of all real samples are less than 2.5%, with recoveries in the range of 94.4%−108.1%, indicating the potentiality of the Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB triple-signal sensing system in the real sample detection.

  Table 1

  

  Table 1.  Determination of RA in real sample.

  DownLoad: CSV

  In general, a new up-conversion fluorescence, colorimetric and photothermal triple-signal sensor has been established for the quantitative detection of RA. Under 980 nm NIR radiation, the Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD nanoparticles can emit green fluorescence concentrated at 550 nm. The fluorescence emission spectrum overlaps with the UV-vis absorption spectrum of oxTMB, leading to the quenching of the green fluorescence. Then, when the colored oxTMB is reduced to colorless TMB by RA, the fluorescence is restored. Thus, RA can be easily determined by measuring the change in fluorescence signal. At the same time, due to the color difference between oxTMB and TMB, as well as the ability of oxTMB to convert light into heat, the readout of RA with colorimetric and photothermal signals is realized. The experimental results show that the RA concentration has a well-linear relationship with fluorescence, absorbance and temperature change, respectively. In particular, our triple-signal sensor analysis method of fluorescence, colorimetric and photothermal can be mutually tested to improve the reliability of the measurement results in the actual environment. Finally, we have demonstrated the potential application of the system in food samples.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  Acknowledgments

  This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21305097), General Project of Education Department in Sichuan (No. 035Z2270), Sichuan Key Discipline Construction Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. 2021-16-4) and Double-Support Plan of Disciplinary Construction in Sichuan Agricultural University -Innovation Team Projects (No. P202108). We would be grateful to Doctor Peng Wu (Analytical&Testing Center, Sichuan University) for his help in testing the fluorescence decay dynamics.

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108099.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     G.D. Kim, Y.S. Park, Y.H. Jin, C.S. Park, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99 (2015) 2083–2092. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6395-6

  2. [2]

     M. Alagawany, M.E. Abd El-Hack, M.R. Farag, et al., Anim. Health Res. Rev. 18 (2017) 167–176. doi: 10.1017/S1466252317000081

  3. [3]

     A.G. Adomako-Bonsu, S.L.F. Chan, M. Pratten, J.R. Fry, Toxicol. in Vitro 40 (2017) 248–255. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.01.016

  4. [4]

     L.M. Ge, M.J. Zhu, X.Y. Li, et al., Food Hydrocoll. 83 (2018) 308–316. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.04.052

  5. [5]

     C.X. Luo, L. Zou, H.J. Sun, et al., Front. Pharmacol. 11 (2020) 153. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00153

  6. [6]

     F.J. Mirza, S. Amber, Sumera, et al., Phytomedicine 83 (2021) 153490. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153490

  7. [7]

     Y. Zhang, J.P. Smuts, E. Dodbiba, et al., J. Agric. Food Chem. 60 (2012) 9305–9314. doi: 10.1021/jf302179c

  8. [8]

     Y. Liu, X.R. Li, Y.H. Li, et al., J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 53 (2010) 698–704. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2010.03.041

  9. [9]

     M. Ozturk, M.E. Duru, B. Ince, et al., Food Chem. 123 (2010) 1352–1356. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.021

  10. [10]

      S. Baskan, N. Oztekin, F.B. Erim, Food Chem. 101 (2007) 1748–1752. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.01.033

  11. [11]

      G. Maduraiveeran, M. Sasidharan, V. Ganesan, Biosens. Bioelectron. 103 (2018) 113–129. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.12.031

  12. [12]

      Y.W. Rong, M.M. Hassan, Q. Ouyang, Q.S. Chen, Compr. Rev. Food. Sci. Food Saf. 20 (2021) 3531–3578. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12765

  13. [13]

      D.M. He, M.M. Yan, P.J. Sun, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 2994–3006. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.078

  14. [14]

      S.N. Lei, H. Cong, Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 1493–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.068

  15. [15]

      W.T. Li, X.N. Zhang, X.T. Hu, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 408 (2021) 124872. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124872

  16. [16]

      L.Z. Liu, Z. Mi, X.Y. Huo, et al., Food Chem. 368 (2022) 130829. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130829

  17. [17]

      Z.S. Zhang, Y. Gao, P. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 2725–2729. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.05.024

  18. [18]

      J.L. Liu, L.L. Lu, A.Q. Li, et al., Biosens. Bioelectron. 68 (2015) 204–209. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.12.053

  19. [19]

      H. Yang, X. Chen, J. Wu, et al., Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 290 (2019) 656–665. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.04.014

  20. [20]

      Y.Y. Chen, T.T. Zhang, X.N. Gao, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 28 (2017) 1983–1986. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.08.024

  21. [21]

      Y.C. Chan, C.W. Chen, M.H. Chan, et al., Biosens. Bioelectron. 80 (2016) 131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.049

  22. [22]

      J.W. Chung, Z. Gerelkhuu, J.H. Oh, Y.I. Lee, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 51 (2016) 678–705. doi: 10.1080/05704928.2016.1167070

  23. [23]

      W.T. Xue, Z.H. Di, Y. Zhao, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 30 (2019) 899–902. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.03.022

  24. [24]

      D. Lu, H. Jiang, G.Y. Zhang, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 (2021) 25738–25747. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c04751

  25. [25]

      N.N. Liang, X.T. Hu, W.T. Li, et al., Food Chem. 343 (2021) 128494. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128494

  26. [26]

      X.M. Li, R.R. Zhao, Y.L. Wei, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 27 (2016) 813–816. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2016.04.001

  27. [27]

      L.H. Su, Y.Q. Chen, L.L. Wang, et al., Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 331 (2021) 129431. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.129431

  28. [28]

      H. Wang, X.M. Wu, S.X. Yang, et al., Food Chem. 286 (2019) 322–328. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.033

  29. [29]

      X.M. Sun, Y. Li, Q. Yang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 1780–1784. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.12.041

  30. [30]

      Y.F. Duan, Q. Li, P.P. He, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 3217–3220. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.10.041

  31. [31]

      Y.Y. Zhang, T.F. Zhao, X.H. Zhang, et al., Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 346 (2021) 130494. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130494

  32. [32]

      D.Y. Yi, Z.X. Wei, W. Zheng, et al., Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 323 (2020) 128691. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128691

  33. [33]

      L. Miao, Q. Nie, J.L. Wang, et al., Appl. Catal. B 248 (2019) 466–476. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.02.047

  34. [34]

      Y. Liu, Q. Ouyang, H.H. Li, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (2017) 18314–18321. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b04978

  35. [35]

      Q. Long, A.J. Fang, Y.Q. Wen, et al., Biosens. Bioelectron. 86 (2016) 109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.06.017

  36. [36]

      D.Q. Fan, E.K. Wang, S.J. Dong, Mater. Horiz. 6 (2019) 375–384. doi: 10.1039/C8MH01151F

  37. [37]

      D.Q. Fan, J. Wang, E.K. Wang, S.J. Dong, Chem. Sci. 10 (2019) 7290–7298. doi: 10.1039/C9SC01865D

• 

  Scheme 1  Schematic diagram of the Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB sensor for RA detection.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 1  (a) TEM, (b) HRTEM, (c) EDX and (d) XRD patterns of Y:Yb/Er.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  (a) UV–vis absorption spectra of Cit, CD, Cit + CD and Cit-CD. (b) FT-IR spectra of Cit, CD, and Cit-CD. (c) UV–vis absorption spectra of Cit-CD, Y:Yb/Er, Y:Yb/Er + Cit-CD and Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD. (d) FT-IR spectra of Cit-CD, Y:Yb/Er, and Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD. (e) EDX pattern and (f) TEM image of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD. (g) STEM image of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD and corresponding elemental mapping images.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  (a) The fluorescence emission spectrum of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD and the UV–vis absorption spectrum of oxTMB and TMB. The insets are corresponding fluorescent visualizations and solution color photographs. (b) The decay dynamics for ⁴S_3/2→⁴I_15/2 transition of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD without and with of oxTMB (250 µmol/L). (c) The excitation and IFE mechanism in Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB system.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  The (a) fluorescence emission spectra, (b) UV–vis absorption spectra and (c) temperature changes of different components. The insets are the corresponding fluorescent visualization photograph and solution color photograph, respectively.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  (a) Fluorescence emission spectra of the sensing system in the presence of different RA concentrations. The inset is the fluorescence visualization photograph of the solution under different RA concentrations, from bottom to top are 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 µmol/L. (b) Linear relationship between fluorescence intensity at 550 nm and the concentration of RA (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 µmol/L). (c) UV–vis absorption spectra of sensing system with different RA concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 µmol/L). The inset is the color photograph of the system at different RA concentrations. (d) Linear relationship between absorbance at 650 nm and the concentration of RA (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 µmol/L). (e) Temperature of sensing system with different RA concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 µmol/L) after 808 nm laser irradiation for 5 min. (f) Linear relationship between the temperature change after 808 nm laser irradiation for 5 min and the concentration of RA (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 µmol/L).

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 6  (a) Fluorescence intensity response, (b) absorbance response and (c) temperature change of Y:Yb/Er-Cit-CD/oxTMB sensing system in the presence of foreign substances.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Table 1.  Determination of RA in real sample.

  下载: 导出CSV
•