English

• Lysosomes are digestive organs of cells, capable of removing damaged organelles and digesting various endogenous and exogenous biological macromolecules, which play a vital role in maintaining cell homeostasis [1, 2]. Mitochondria, as the "energy factory" of cells, not only participate in the production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), but also regulate cell growth, cycle and apoptosis, which are closely related to cell senescence and occurrence of tumors [3-5]. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER), possessing the largest membrane area compared with other organelles, is an indispensable part of eukaryotic cells for being involved in plenty of biological processes, including exogenous metabolism and protein synthesis [6-9]. The Golgi apparatus is a transporter organelle which can manage and transport abundant proteins synthesized by the ER, delivering them to other organelles or secreting them outside the cells [10, 11]. The normal function of these organelles is fundamental to the maintenance of cellular homeostasis and health of organism. The stability of intracellular microenvironment provides basis for the normal operation of organelles. As a crucial factor affecting the stability of microenvironment, viscosity plays an important role in biomolecular interactions, enzyme catalysis, signaling and other biological diffusion processes [12-14]. Abnormal viscosity levels are associated with a variety of diseases, including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and even cancer [10, 15].

  Traditional methods of viscosity measurement using mechanicals, such as rotary viscometer, can only be used to measure viscosity of macroscopic materials. In recent years, fluorescent probe technology has been popular with researchers because of its noninvasiveness, in situ-imaging, real-time detection, high analytical sensitivity and other advantages. Researchers have developed various viscosity fluorescent probes based on molecular rotors, and these probes exhibit enhanced fluorescence or prolonged fluorescence lifetime as the system viscosity increases [16-18]. However, the practical application of many probes which emit green or blue fluorescence is limited due to short emission wavelength and poor tissue penetration [19, 20]. Moreover, many viscosity fluorescent probes targeting lysosomes are highly dependent on acidic pH environment, and may lose their ability to trace lysosome when pH increases owing to the resumption of photoinduced electron transfer (PET) processes [21-23]. Due to its long emission wavelength, the near infrared fluorescent (NIR) probe has the advantages of deep tissue penetration, little background fluorescence interference and weak fluorescence background [10, 24, 25]. Therefore, development of near-infrared viscosity fluorescence probes with multi-organelle localization ability is of great significance for biological imaging and disease diagnosis.

  In this contribution, DCIC (Scheme 1) was prepared by coupling cyanogen modified hemicyanine group and pyrrolidine modified coumarin group. The pyrrolidine modified coumarin unit served as an electron donor, and the cyanogen modified hemicyanine acted as an electron-withdrawing group, which make DCIC capable of viscosity sensitivity based on twisted intramolecular charge transfer. The steps for synthesis of DCIC are shown in Scheme S1 (Supporting information). Compounds C1, C2, D1 and D2 are prepared according to our previous work [26]. Unlike many pH-dependent lysosomal viscosity probes, fluorescence quenching of DCIC did not occur with environment changing from acidic to neutral or alkaline, providing the basis for multi-organelle localization. Besides, DCIC also has the advantages of long emission wavelength, large Stokes shift, high photostability and low cytotoxicity. These features enable DCIC to locate lysosomes, mitochondria, Golgi, and ER in cells and monitor lysosomal viscosity changes.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  Molecular structure of probe DCIC and the proposed viscosity sensing mechanism.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The photophysical property of DCIC was first investigated in various organic solvents. As depicted in Fig. S1A (Supporting information), the maximum absorption wavelength of probe DCIC dissolved in DMSO, DMF, MeOH, EtOH, Acetone, CH₃CN, THF, EA, CH₂Cl₂, CHCl₃ and glycerol was around 500 nm. Therefore, the corresponding fluorescence emission spectrum was measured using 500 nm as the excitation wavelength. Fluorescence intensity of DCIC in glycerol was obviously strong, comparing with the weak fluorescence in DMSO, DMF, EtOH, CH₂Cl₂ and other low-viscosity organic solvents (Fig. S1B in Supporting information). Besides, as depicted in Table 1, fluorescence quantum yield of DCIC in glycerol (φ = 19.69%) is much higher than those observed in other organic solvents. These results show that probe DCIC can respond to viscosity without polarity interference.

  Table 1

  

  Table 1.  Photophysical properties of DCIC.

  DownLoad: CSV

  The sensitive response of DCIC toward viscosity was investigated in PBS-glycerol solvents with volume ratio of glycerol increased from 0 to 95 (1.0–438.4 cp). With the increase of solvent viscosity, the absorption intensity of DCIC showed a general enhancement, and a slight red-shift of the maximum absorption wavelength appeared, which can be ascribed to a lower energy transition caused by enlarged conjugate planar (Fig. 1A). Meanwhile, fluorescence intensity of DCIC at 630 nm increased gradually and showed 83 times enhancement in 95% glycerol compared with that in pure PBS (Fig. 1B). The recovery of fluorescence could be attributed to the high viscosity of glycerol limiting the intramolecular rotation speed of hemicyanine and coumarin moieties along vinyl group. Correspondingly, it can be observed under naked eyes that the color of DCIC solution changed from light-orange to deep-orange and under the irradiation of 365 nm portable UV lamp, fluorescence color became stronger with the increase of solution viscosity (Figs. 1C and D). In addition, by fitting the Forster-Hoffmann equation (Fig. 1B, inset), there was an excellent linear relationship between fluorescence intensity (log I₆₃₀) and viscosity (log η) of DCIC (R² = 0.99, x = 1.12). All these findings illustrate that probe DCIC was able to indicate solution viscosity quantitatively.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  (A) UV–vis absorption spectra of probe DCIC (10 µmol/L) in PBS-glycerol mixed solvents. (B) Fluorescence spectra of probe DCIC (10 µmol/L) in PBS-glycerol mixed solvents, insert: the picture of linear relationship between the log of maximum emission intensity of DCIC at 630 nm (log I₆₃₀) and log η (viscosity), λ_ex = 500 nm, slits: 5/5 nm. (C) The color change of DCIC in PBS-glycerol mixed solvents in the natural light and (D) the light of 365 nm portable UV lamp.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In order to investigate the effect of pH on the fluorescence response performance of DCIC, the UV–vis spectra and fluorescence spectra of DCIC in PBS buffer solutions with increasing pH values were tested. As shown in Fig. S2 (Supporting information), fluorescence intensity enhanced for 5 times when pH of the solution changed from 8 to 2. Because DCIC possesses both pyrrolidine nitrogen and hemicyanine nitrogen, it was difficult to determine which nitrogen atom affected fluorescence emission. In order to find out the structural and conformational changes during acidity enhancement, Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was titrated into solution of DCIC to confirm which nitrogen atom was protonated. The results in Fig. 2 showed that there were obviously gradual downfield shifts of proton peaks in coumarin scaffold in addition to hemicyanine scaffold after adding TFA, except for the proton peak at the n position, indicating that when acidity increased, both pyrrolidine nitrogen atom and indole nitrogen atom were protonated [27], resulting in fluorescence quenching of DCIC. The fluorescence response in solutions with different viscosity at different pH was tested to further explore the effect of viscosity and pH on DCIC. The result in Figs. 3A and B showed that when the pH of DCIC solution was the same, the fluorescence of DCIC enhanced as viscosity increased; when the viscosity was constant, except for pure PBS solution, the fluorescence spectrum of the probe DCIC kept almost identical in the range of pH 3–9. These results indicated that when viscosity was high, the pH-dependence of DCIC would be weakened and the TICT effect would be enhanced. Moreover, the lysosomes of normal cells are acidic (pH 3.8–5.5) [21, 22], so the pH-dependence of DCIC makes it especially suitable for the detection of viscosity in intracellular acidic environment. Unlike the pH dependence of many lysosomal probes [28, 29], fluorescence of DCIC was not quenched in neutral and alkaline environments, which also provided the basis for the localization of various organelles.

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  ¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) spectroscopic titration of DCIC with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  (A) Fluorescence intensity of DCIC (10 µmol/L) at 630 nm in PBS/glycerol mixed solvents at different pH (3–9) and viscosity (1.0–438.4 cp). (B) Fluorescence intensity of DCIC (10 µmol/L) at 630 nm in PBS buffer solution (1.0 cp) and PBS/glycerol mixed solvents (7.9 cp) at different pH (3−9). (C) Fluorescence intensity ratio of DCIC (10 µmol/L) upon addition of different biologically relevants (3 µL, 0.1 mol/L), 1. Ca²⁺, 2. Cu²⁺, 3. Fe²⁺, 4. Fe³⁺, 5. K⁺, 6. Mg²⁺, 7. Mn²⁺, 8. Na⁺, 9. Zn²⁺, 10. F⁻, 11. Cl⁻, 12. S²⁻, 13. ClO⁻, 14. CO₃²⁻, 15. HSO₃⁻, 16. Cys, 17. GSH, 18. H₂O₂. (D) The time-dependent fluorescence changes of DCIC (10 µmol/L) at 665 nm in PBS buffer solution (λ_ex =500 nm, slits: 10/10 nm) and in 95% glycerol solution (λ_ex =500 nm, slits: 5/5 nm), respectively.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The cellular microenvironment is a complex system, so probes must have excellent specificity towards viscosity. We added interfering substances to PBS buffer solution of the probe, including Ca²⁺, Cu²⁺, Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺, K⁺, Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺, Na⁺, Zn²⁺, F⁻, Cl⁻, S²⁻, ClO⁻, CO₃²⁻, HSO₃⁻, Cys, GSH, H₂O₂. As depicted in Fig. 3C, these species did not cause obvious fluorescence changes of DCIC, indicating that the specificity toward viscosity of DCIC was satisfactory. In addition, the photostability of DCIC was also tested. Fluorescence intensity at 665 nm was barely changed in 60 min no matter in PBS buffer solution or 95% glycerol solution (Fig. 3D), proving that probe DCIC was highly stable.

  The cytotoxicity of probe DCIC was examined by the MTT assay before confocal imaging of cells. After 12 h of incubation with varied concentrations of DCIC in HeLa cells, no obvious cytotoxicity was observed (Fig. S3 in Supporting information), indicating that probe DCIC can be applied to bio-imaging. To verify whether DCIC can localize multiple organelles, we performed colocalization experiments of DCIC with commercial mitochondrial probe (Mito-tracker Green), lysosomal probe (Lyso-tracker Green), Golgi probe (Golgi-tracker Green), endoplasmic reticulum probe (ER-tracker Green). Following pretreatment with probe DCIC for 1 h, HeLa cells were then stained with these commercial dyes, respectively, and images were obtained with a laser confocal microscope. As we can see from Fig. 4, cells labeled by DCIC gave red fluorescence and cells labeled by commercial dyes exhibited green fluorescence, respectively. The red image of DCIC in mitochondria, lysosomes, Golgi apparatus and ER merged very well with the green images, resulting obvious yellow images. Additionally, the Pearson's correlation coefficients of probe DCIC with MTG, LTG, GTG and ERTG were 0.96, 0.96, 0.87, and 0.87, respectively, which confirmed that probe DCIC can accurately locate mitochondria, lysosomes, Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum in HeLa cells.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  Cell imaging of DCIC in HeLa cells. (A, E, I, M) Images of DCIC (1 µmol/L) in the red emission channel. (B, F, J, N) Fluorescence from commercial dyes in the green emission channel. (C, G, K, O) Merged images of the red and green channels. (D, H, L, P) The correlation plots of red and green channels.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The ability of fluorescence probe to localize mitochondria is easily affected by mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ_m) [30, 31]. In order to assess whether the mitochondrial localization ability of DCIC will be affected by ΔΨ_m, HeLa cells were incubated with mitochondrial depolarizing agent CCCP (carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone), which is commonly used in cell biology [32, 33], then colocalization experiment of DCIC was conducted with Mito-tracker Green. The results displayed in Fig. 5 indicated that after treatment with CCCP, the red fluorescence from DCIC was still highly overlapped with the green fluorescence of MTG. Moreover, Pearson's correlation coefficient between them is 0.86, which changed slightly compared with the control group without CCCP incubation. These results revealed that the ability of DCIC to locate mitochondria was not affected by ΔΨ_m.

  Figure 5

  

  Figure 5.  Fluorescence images of HeLa cells: (A-D) Cells were treated with DCIC (10 µmol/L) and Mito-Tracker Green (1 µmol/L) for 30 min. (E-H) Cells were pretreated with DCIC (10 µmol/L) and Mito-Tracker Green (1 µmol/L) for 30 min, then incubated with CCCP (20 µmol/L) for another 30 min.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In accordance with previous report [34], mitochondrial viscosity increased after CCCP treatment. A slight enhancement of fluorescence intensity of DCIC was found in CCCP-treated cells (Fig. 5). To further study the ability of DCIC to detect mitochondrial and lysosomal viscosity, DCIC-stained cells was treated with dexamethasone (DXM), an anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drug that could increase lysosomal and mitochondrial viscosity [34, 35]. The results in Fig. 6 revealed that fluorescence intensity of DCIC in lysosome was weaker than that in mitochondria before dexamethasone treatment. However, though fluorescence intensity of DCIC in both mitochondria and lysosomes increased after dexamethasone treatment, the results of semi-quantitative analysis of intracellular fluorescence intensity showed fluorescence intensity in lysosomes increased more obviously than that in mitochondria after DXM treatment. Compared with mitochondria, lysosomes are more acidic. Therefore, before DXM treatment, on account of the protonation of nitrogen atoms in DCIC molecules, the fluorescence intensity of DCIC in lysosomes was weak, and after the increase of lysosome viscosity, fluorescence of DCIC in lysosomes obviously increased due to TICT effect. These results were also consistent with the results of spectral tests, suggesting that probe DCIC is suitable for monitoring intracellular lysosomal viscosity changes.

  Figure 6

  

  Figure 6.  Confocal microscopic images of lysosomes (A) and mitochondria (B) pretreated with DXM (20 µmol/L) and then incubated with DCIC (1 µmol/L) and Lyso-tracker Green (1 µmol/L) and Mito-tracker Green (1 µmol/L), respectively. (C) Semiquantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity: 1. HeLa cells treated with DCIC and LTG; 2. HeLa cells pretreated with DXM and then incubated with DCIC and LTG; 3. HeLa cells treated with DCIC and MTG; 4. HeLa cells pretreated with DXM and then incubated with DCIC and MTG.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In summary, we have synthesized a viscosity fluorescence probe with hemicyanine structure based on molecular rotor. Probe DCIC possesses large Stokes shift, excellent selectivity, good sensitivity, near infrared emission (630 nm) and good photostability. Because the protonation of N atoms in probe DCIC, DCIC has unique pH dependence, and the fluorescence will not be quenched in alkaline environment. Cellular assessments revealed that DCIC had low cytotoxicity and could accurately locate mitochondria, lysosomes, endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus. In addition, due to the joint action of pH-dependence and TICT mechanism, DCIC can detect the change of lysosome viscosity. This probe provides a powerful tool for multi-organelle localization and lysosomal viscosity detection, and provides a promising strategy for the design of pH-dependent lysosomal viscosity fluorescence probes.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper

  Acknowledgments

  We are grateful for the financial supports from Scientific and Technological Key Project in Henan Province (No. 22170015), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1704161), Zhengzhou University (No. 32211807) and Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project (No. JC21253010).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.049.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     R.M. Perera, R. Zoncu, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 32 (2016) 223–253. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125125

  2. [2]

     C. Yang, X. Wang, J. Cell Biol. 220 (2021) e202102001. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202102001

  3. [3]

     M.D. Shawn, G.V.H. Matthew, Annu. Rev. Pharmacool. Toxicol. 57 (2017) 481–507. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010715-103101

  4. [4]

     J.B. Spinelli, M.C. Haigis, Nat. Cell Biol. 20 (2018) 745–754. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0124-1

  5. [5]

     S. Javadov, A.V. Kozlov, A.K.S. Camara, Cells 9 (2020) 1177. doi: 10.3390/cells9051177

  6. [6]

     X. Chen, J.R. Cubillos-Ruiz, Nat. Rev. Cancer 21 (2021) 71–88. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-00312-2

  7. [7]

     M.J. Phillips, G.K. Voeltz, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17 (2016) 69–82. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2015.8

  8. [8]

     N. Fatemeh, A.C. Robert, Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 13 (2016) 25–40. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.192

  9. [9]

     T.S. Neil, G.S. Savannah, L.S. Cristina, G.P. Meares, Mol. Neurodegener. 12 (2017) 42. doi: 10.1186/s13024-017-0183-y

  10. [10]

      H. Zhu, J. Fan, J. Du, X. Peng, Acc. Chem. Res. 49 (2016) 2115–2126. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00292

  11. [11]

      J.I. Sbodio, B.D. Paul, C.E. Machamer, S.H. Snyder, Cell Rep. 4 (2013) 890–897. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.001

  12. [12]

      J. Cui, Y. Yao, C. Chen, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 30 (2019) 1071–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.12.031

  13. [13]

      L. Hao, Z.W. Li, D.Y. Zhang, et al., Chem. Sci. 10 (2019) 1285–1293. doi: 10.1039/c8sc04242j

  14. [14]

      P. Ning, W. Wang, M. Chen, Y. Feng, X. Meng, Chin. Chem. Lett. 28 (2017) 1943–1951. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.09.026

  15. [15]

      A.S. Klymchenko, Acc. Chem. Res. 50 (2017) 366–375. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00517

  16. [16]

      J. Yin, L. Huang, L. Wu, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 (2021) 12098–12150. doi: 10.1039/d1cs00645b

  17. [17]

      S. Wang, B. Zhou, N. Wang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 2897–2902. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.03.037

  18. [18]

      X. Zhang, H. Yan, F. Huo, J. Chao, C. Yin, Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 344 (2021) 130244. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130244

  19. [19]

      X. Li, R. Zhao, Y. Wang, C. Huang, J. Mater. Chem. B 6 (2018) 6592–6598. doi: 10.1039/c8tb01885e

  20. [20]

      L.L. Li, K. Li, M.Y. Li, et al., Anal. Chem. 90 (2018) 5873–5878. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00590

  21. [21]

      L. Wang, Y. Xiao, W. Tian, L. Deng, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 2903–2906. doi: 10.1021/ja311688g

  22. [22]

      B. Dong, X. Song, C. Wang, et al., Anal. Chem. 88 (2016) 4085–4091. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00422

  23. [23]

      P. Gautam, R. Sharma, R. Misra, et al., Chem. Sci. 8 (2017) 2017–2024. doi: 10.1039/C6SC04461A

  24. [24]

      J. Li, J. Rao, K. Pu, Biomaterials 155 (2018) 217–235. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.025

  25. [25]

      F. Ding, Y. Zhan, X. Lu, Y. Sun, Chem. Sci. 9 (2018) 4370–4380. doi: 10.1039/c8sc01153b

  26. [26]

      C. Yang, J. Song, Y. Ding, et al., Dyes Pigm. 191 (2021) 109377. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109377

  27. [27]

      J. Park, B. Lim, N.K. Lee, et al., Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 309 (2020) 127764. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.127764

  28. [28]

      M. Grossi, M. Morgunova, S. Cheung, et al., Nat. Commun. 7 (2016) 10855. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10855

  29. [29]

      G. Niu, P. Zhang, W. Liu, et al., Anal. Chem. 89 (2017) 1922–1929. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04417

  30. [30]

      J. Li, N. Kwon, Y. Jeong, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (2018) 12150–12154. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b14548

  31. [31]

      X. Li, R. Zhang, L. Guo, et al., Anal. Chem. 91 (2019) 2672–2677. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03986

  32. [32]

      P.E.Z. Klier, J.G. Martin, E.W. Miller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 4095–4099. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c13110

  33. [33]

      L. Fan, J. Ge, Q. Zan, et al., Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 327 (2021) 128929. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128929

  34. [34]

      Y.F. Wei, X.F. Weng, X.L. Sha, et al., Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 326 (2021) 128954. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128954

  35. [35]

      S. Humphries, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (2013) 14693–14698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300891110

• 

  Figure 1  Molecular structure of probe DCIC and the proposed viscosity sensing mechanism.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 1  (A) UV–vis absorption spectra of probe DCIC (10 µmol/L) in PBS-glycerol mixed solvents. (B) Fluorescence spectra of probe DCIC (10 µmol/L) in PBS-glycerol mixed solvents, insert: the picture of linear relationship between the log of maximum emission intensity of DCIC at 630 nm (log I₆₃₀) and log η (viscosity), λ_ex = 500 nm, slits: 5/5 nm. (C) The color change of DCIC in PBS-glycerol mixed solvents in the natural light and (D) the light of 365 nm portable UV lamp.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  ¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) spectroscopic titration of DCIC with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  (A) Fluorescence intensity of DCIC (10 µmol/L) at 630 nm in PBS/glycerol mixed solvents at different pH (3–9) and viscosity (1.0–438.4 cp). (B) Fluorescence intensity of DCIC (10 µmol/L) at 630 nm in PBS buffer solution (1.0 cp) and PBS/glycerol mixed solvents (7.9 cp) at different pH (3−9). (C) Fluorescence intensity ratio of DCIC (10 µmol/L) upon addition of different biologically relevants (3 µL, 0.1 mol/L), 1. Ca²⁺, 2. Cu²⁺, 3. Fe²⁺, 4. Fe³⁺, 5. K⁺, 6. Mg²⁺, 7. Mn²⁺, 8. Na⁺, 9. Zn²⁺, 10. F⁻, 11. Cl⁻, 12. S²⁻, 13. ClO⁻, 14. CO₃²⁻, 15. HSO₃⁻, 16. Cys, 17. GSH, 18. H₂O₂. (D) The time-dependent fluorescence changes of DCIC (10 µmol/L) at 665 nm in PBS buffer solution (λ_ex =500 nm, slits: 10/10 nm) and in 95% glycerol solution (λ_ex =500 nm, slits: 5/5 nm), respectively.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  Cell imaging of DCIC in HeLa cells. (A, E, I, M) Images of DCIC (1 µmol/L) in the red emission channel. (B, F, J, N) Fluorescence from commercial dyes in the green emission channel. (C, G, K, O) Merged images of the red and green channels. (D, H, L, P) The correlation plots of red and green channels.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  Fluorescence images of HeLa cells: (A-D) Cells were treated with DCIC (10 µmol/L) and Mito-Tracker Green (1 µmol/L) for 30 min. (E-H) Cells were pretreated with DCIC (10 µmol/L) and Mito-Tracker Green (1 µmol/L) for 30 min, then incubated with CCCP (20 µmol/L) for another 30 min.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 6  Confocal microscopic images of lysosomes (A) and mitochondria (B) pretreated with DXM (20 µmol/L) and then incubated with DCIC (1 µmol/L) and Lyso-tracker Green (1 µmol/L) and Mito-tracker Green (1 µmol/L), respectively. (C) Semiquantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity: 1. HeLa cells treated with DCIC and LTG; 2. HeLa cells pretreated with DXM and then incubated with DCIC and LTG; 3. HeLa cells treated with DCIC and MTG; 4. HeLa cells pretreated with DXM and then incubated with DCIC and MTG.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Table 1.  Photophysical properties of DCIC.

  下载: 导出CSV
•