English

• The C-N bond formation as well as the construction of C-C bond is an important chemical transformation in organic syntheses [1-6]. Among these effective approaches of formation of C-N bonds, three-component Mannich reaction is one of the most feasible strategies for preparation of β-amino carbonyl derivatives with C-N bond and it has attracted a considerable amount of attention by synthetic chemists owing to its high atom economy and efficiency over the past few decades [7-10]. In theory, the Mannich coupling process of arylacetylenes and amines is considered to involve the activation of the terminal C-H bond of acetylene by a nucleophile and active metal (Ag, Cu, etc.) insertion, therefore the metal catalysts are expected to play a key role in reducing the activation energy of the Mannich reaction, thereby enhancing the catalytic efficiency [11, 12]. Thus, there is a rapidly growing topic for the synthesis of functionalized transition-metal catalysts to promote the Mannich reaction in organic conversion. Although the development of a multitude of well-designed catalysts toward Mannich reaction has been presented in the past decade, and the current disadvantages of this process are a certain amount of energy consumed and the reused of catalysts, etc. [13]. Therefore, the search for highly active and operated more easily catalyst systems remains one of the longstanding research subjects.

  In additionally, 2-chloroethylethylsulfide (CEES), as a dangerous simulant sulfur mustard, is one typical example of a Chemical Weapons Agents (CWAs) that can be a persistent threat to mankind because of its vesicant properties [14, 15]. Therefore, it is urgent to develop efficient catalytic materials to detoxicate this dangerous blistering agent. Thus, the environment friendly outstanding degradation catalytic system at room temperature for CEES is still in exploring [16].

  As a representative of multifunctional crystalline materials, polyoxometalates (POMs) is the nanoscale early transition-metal oxide polyanionic clusters and remarkable building blocks in the self- assembly of versatile and intriguing inorganic-organic functionalized hybrids [17-22]. Among POMs materials, the hybrid POVs have been gaining considerable importance and extensive attention in the domain of magnetism, catalysis, energy conversion and fluorescence [23, 24], etc. Additionally, the transition-metal silver cations, as the soft d¹⁰ element and the good metal connector, are suitable candidates in the process of synthesizing Ag-decorated hybrids owing to its diverse coordination modes [25-33]. Sun's group first prepared a new silver(I)‐based rugby-ball shaped [Ag₁₀@(W₇O₂₆)₂@Ag₇₄] with the carboxylate-controlled skeletal isomerism in silver nanoclusters [34]. Recently, Suzuki et al. successively synthesized the novel triangular TBA₉H₄[Ag₇(Si₃W₂₇O₉₆)]12C₃H₆O and atomically precise TBA₁₆(Me₂NH₂)₈H₅Ag₂[Ag₂₇(Si₆W₅₄O₁₉₈) nanocluster and these compounds exhibited the unprecedented ultrastability in both solid and solution states [35, 36]. So far, limited research of Ag-complexes modified POVs has developed, for example, Gao and his co-workers reported the self-assembly of metavanadate and silver(I) salts generated a novel dodecahedrane-like [Ag₃₀(tBuS)₂₀V₁₂O₃₄]10CH₃OH with the properties of acid-base induced transformation [37]. Xie and Mak isolated two unprecedented neutral silver(I)-ethynide phosphonate-functionized polyoxovanadates giant clusters [38]. Although these elegant works about Ag-POVs have been well demonstrated, their catalytic properties are rarely involved. In this context, the construction of Ag-POVs with a controllable molar ratio of Ag⁺ to POVs still remains a challenge [39]. Importantly, the examples of Ag-POVs as catalysts were applied in the field of formation of C-N bond and catalytic degradation for CEES reactions have not been fully explored [40]. Therefore, designing of new Ag-POVs crystalline materials with the efficient catalytic properties in organic conversion is an undoubtedly both highly demanding and challenging task.

  Herein, three novel Ag-POVs frameworks, i.e., [Ag(IM)₂]₂V₄O₁₂2Ag(IM)₂ (APF-1), [Ag₂(1-eIM)₄]₂[Ag(1-eIM)₂]₃2Ag(1-eIM)₂[V₁₀O₂₈]₂ (APF-2) and [Ag(1-pIM)₂]₃[HV₁₀O₂₈]2Ag(1-pIM)₂ (APF-3), have been successfully constructed using imidazole derivatives and NH₄VO₃ (or V₂O₅) as initial reaction substrates in water (Fig. 1). Notably, these APFs are further used as effective catalysts in the selective oxidation of CEES and Mannich reaction under mild conditions. Interestingly, APF-2 presents the excellent heterogeneous catalytic performance (yields up to 99%) superior to its components, APF-1 and APF-3. Furthermore, based on the control experiments and previous results, the two possible mechanisms about the oxidation of CEES and Mannich reaction catalyzed by APF-2 have been proposed to explain the observed catalytic activities.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  Simplified ball-and-stick representation of the syntheses of APFs 1–3. Color code: Ag, turquiose; V, green; N, blue; O, red; C, gray

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  As transition-metal hybrid POVs could exhibit the adjustable molecular structures, it is important to develop the reliable synthetic conditions toward some specific transition-metal-POVs structures with a controllable molar ratio of transition metal to POVs [41]. Herein, the reaction between carbonyl diimidazole, 1-ethylimidazole or 1-propylimidazole with NH₄VO₃ or V₂O₅ and AgNO₃ in an aqueous solution resulted in the formation of three POVs-based silver hybrids ([V₄O₁₂]⁴⁻ for APF-1, [V₁₀O₂₈]⁶⁻ for APF-2 and APF-3), respectively. Interestingly, the APFs 1–3 with diverse coordination modes of Ag⁺ cations and different molar ratios of Ag⁺ to POVs (from 4:1, 4.5:1 to 5:1) are obtained, which mainly caused by the different base environment and starting materials in the formation of these APFs.

  Single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements reveals that the asymmetric unit of APF-1 contains two Ag⁺ ions, one [V₂O₆]²⁻ anion and four imidazole ligands (derived from carbonyl diimidazole) (Fig. 2a) [42]. The bond valence sum calculations show that both V atoms in the POVs are in +V oxidation state (Table S3 in Supporting information). In APF-1, the two crystallographically independent V atoms (V1 and V2) possess the distorted [VO₄] tetrahedron by a terminal O atom and three bridging O atoms, respectively, and further form the [V₂O₆]²⁻ cluster by one of their corner-sharing O3 atom (Fig. 2a). The [V₂O₆]²⁻ cluster is further connected by the other corner-sharing O5 atom to form a [V₄O₁₂]⁴⁻ cluster. The [V₄O₁₂]⁴⁻ clusters in APF-1 act as bridging inorganic ligands and coordinate with four silver centers, as shown in Fig. 2d. Notably, two crystallographically independent Ag1 and Ag2 ions exhibit two types of coordination geometries. The Ag1 center is four-coordinated by one terminal O1 atom from the [V₄O₁₂]⁴⁻ cluster, two N donors (N1 and N3) from two imidazole ligands and one Ag1#1 ion (#1: -x, 1-y, -z) through the AgAg argentophilic interaction in a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry (Fig. 2b) [43]. Interestingly, the Ag2 ion is coordinated by one terminal O6 atom from the [V₄O₁₂]⁴⁻ cluster and two N donors (N5 and N7) from two imidazole ligands, adopting a three-coordinated pattern with a T-type geometry (Fig. 2c). Through the unique Ag^…Ag argentophilic interaction, the [V₄O₁₂]⁴⁻ clusters are further connected together by [Ag₂(IM)₄]²⁺ units to form a 1D chain structure (Fig. 2d).

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  Simplified ball-and-stick and polyhedron representation of APF-1. (a) The asymmetric unit of APF-1. (b) The coordination environment of Ag1 atom. (c) The coordination environment of Ag2 atom. (d) The 1D chain structure of APF-1. Color code: Ag, turquiose; V polyhedron, red; N, blue; O, red; C, gray

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The molecular structure of APF-2 consists of two typical [V₁₀O₂₈]⁶⁻ anions, nine Ag⁺ ions and twenty-one 1-eIM ligands (eighteen coordinated 1-eIM and three protonated free 1-HeIM), as shown in Fig. 1. Each [V₁₀O₂₈]⁶⁻ polyanion of APF-2 has a crystallographic center on the midpoint of O19 and O22 and it is made up of ten distorted [VO₆] octahedron, including the highly condensed ten vanadium atoms and twenty-eight different types of oxygen atoms. The bond distances and bond angles of the [V₁₀O₂₈]⁶⁻ anion are similar with those of reported decavanadate [44, 45]. In APF-2, these crystallographically independent Ag⁺ ions (Ag1 to Ag5) exhibit four types of coordination geometries: (I) The Ag1 and Ag2 ions adopt five-coordinated pattern (Fig. 3a). The Ag1 ion is surrounded by one terminal O1 atom from the [V₁₀O₂₈]⁶⁻ anion, one bridging O2#1 (#1: 1-x, -y, 1-z) atom from the adjacent [V₁₀O₂₈]⁶⁻ anion, two N atoms (N1 and N3) from two 1-eIM ligands and one Ag1#1 atom through the Ag…Ag argentophilic interaction, and resulted in a {AgN₂O₂} geometry. The Ag2 ion is coordinated by one bridging O25 atom from one [V₁₀O₂₈]⁶⁻ anion, one terminal O26#2 (#2: 1-x, 1-y, 2-z) atom, two N atoms (N7 and N5#2) from two 1-eIM ligands and one Ag atom (Ag2#2). (Ⅱ) The Ag3 ion is four-coordinated by two N atoms (N9 and N11) from two 1-eIM ligands, one terminal O atom from one [V₁₀O₂₈]⁶⁻ anion and the Ag4 atom through the Ag…Ag argentophilic interaction, and the coordination environment of Ag3 employs the {AgN₂O} mode (Fig. 3b). (Ⅲ) The Ag4 ion adopts four-coordinated pattern with square plane geometry (Fig. 3c). The Ag4 ion is surrounded by two N atoms (N13 and N13#3 (#3: 1-x, -y, 2-z) from two 1-eIM ligands and two Ag atoms (Ag3 and Ag3#3), and presents the {Ag₂N₂} coordination mode (Fig. 3c). (Ⅳ) As depicted in Fig. 3d, Ag5 ion is in linear geometries by two N atoms (N15 and N17) from two 1-eIM ligands. Interestingly, the Ag1 and Ag2 ions connect the adjacent [V₁₀O₂₈]⁶⁻ anions into a 1D chain structure, and further the adjacent 1D chain structures are connected together to form a 2D network along the bc plane (Fig. 3e).

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  Simplified ball-and-stick and polyhedron representation of APF-2. (a) The coordination environment of Ag1 atom; (b) the coordination environment of Ag3 atom; (c) the coordination environment of Ag4 atom; (d) the coordination environment of Ag5 atom; (e) the 2D network structure of APF-2. Color code: Ag, turquiose; V polyhedron, red; N, blue; O, red; C, gray. The 1-eIM ligands are removed for clarity.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The asymmetric unit of APF-3 contains five Ag⁺ ions, one typical [HV₁₀O₂₈]⁵⁻ anion and ten 1-pIM ligands (Fig. 1). The [HV₁₀O₂₈]⁵⁻ anion of APF-3 has a crystallographic center on the midpoint of O14 and O14#1 (#1: 2-x, -y, 2-z) and it is made up of ten distorted [VO₆] octahedron including the highly condensed ten vanadium atoms and twenty-eight different types of oxygen atoms. In APF-3, three crystallographically independent Ag⁺ ions (Ag1 to Ag3) exhibit three types of coordination geometries: (I) The Ag1 ion is six-coordinated by two bridging O12 and O12#2 atoms (#2: 1-x, -y, 2-z) from two [HV₁₀O₂₈]⁵⁻ anions, two N atoms (N1 and N1#2) from two 1-pIM ligands and two Ag atoms (Ag2 and Ag2#), adopting the distorted octahedron geometry (Fig. 4a). (Ⅱ) The Ag2 ion is five-coordinated by two terminal O11 and O13#2 atoms from two [HV₁₀O₂₈]⁵⁻ anions, two N atoms (N3#2 and N5#2) from two 1-pIM ligands and one Ag atoms (Ag1) through the Ag^…Ag interaction in a {AgN₂O₂} mode (Fig. 4b). (Ⅲ) The Ag3#3 (#3: 2-x, 1-y, 1-z) ion is four-coordinated by one terminal O4 atoms, one bridging O6#3 atoms from two [HV₁₀O₂₈]⁵⁻ anions and two N atoms (N7#3 and N9#3) from two 1-pIM ligands, displaying the square plane geometry (Fig. 4c). Interestingly, the Ag1 and Ag2 ions connect the adjacent [HV₁₀O₂₈]⁵⁻ anions into a 1D chain structure along the a axis, and further the adjacent 1D chain structures are connected into a 2D network along the ab plane (Fig. 4d).

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  Simplified ball-and-stick and polyhedron representation of APF-3. (a) The coordination environment of Ag1 atom. (b) The coordination environment of Ag2 atom. (c) The coordination environment of Ag3 atom. (d) The 2D network structure of APF-3. Color code: Ag, turquiose; V polyhedron, red; N, blue; O, red; C, gray. The 1-pIM ligands are removed for clarity.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Subsequently, on the basis of determining the structure of APFs, we further investigated the catalytic effectiveness of these APFs in the construction of C-N bond via Mannich reaction. In our initial studies, phenylacetylene (1a), formaldehyde (1b) and piperidine (1c) were selected as model substrates to examine the efficiency of these APFs in the construction of C-N bond (Table 1). We conducted the three component reaction under the conditions of 1a (0.25 mmol), aqueous 1b (0.5 mmol) and 1c (0.5 mmol) in CH₃CN (1 mL) in the presence of catalysts at mild conditions for 4 h

  Table 1

  

  Table 1.  The effect of different parameters on Mannich reaction.^a

  DownLoad: CSV

  To begin, the blank experiment indicated that only trace conversion was achieved in the absence of any catalysts (Table 1, entry 1). The reactants phenylacetylene (1a), formaldehyde (1b) and piperidine (1c) were smoothly reacted with AgNO₃ as the homogeneous catalyst, which gave rise to the desired product 1-(3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-yl)piperidine 1d in 21% yield (Table 1, entry 3), nevertheless, the scale potential industrial applications of the AgNO₃ catalyst have been limited due to its non-reusability. Prompted by this initial observation, the model reaction was thoroughly optimized by varying different parameters, such as catalyst, the amount of catalyst, and reaction time (Table 1). The use of other catalysts like APF-1, APF-2 and APF-3 improved the product yields from 72% to 83%, respectively (Table 1, entries 4–6). APF-2 with the best performance is selected as the target catalyst for further characterization. Keeping all other parameters of entry 5 as such, the amount of catalyst and reaction time were then examined, which markedly disclosed 1.5 mol% and 8 h as optimum conditions and entry 9 as the best fit. Consequently, the best conditions for synthesis of the 1-(3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-yl)piperidine were optimized as follows: 1a (0.25 mmol), 1b (0.5 mmol), 1c (0.5 mmol) and APF-2 (1.5 mol%), MeCN (1 mL), 40 ℃, 8 h

  With the established conditions in hand, the scope and versatility of the reaction were subsequently examined (Table 2). A diverse array of acetylenes containing electron-donating groups such as -Me, -Et, n-Pr, n-Bu, as well as electron-withdrawing groups such as -Cl, participated nicely with formaldehyde and piperidine under the optimized conditions was amenable to afford the predictable coupling products in excellent yields (up to 99%) (Table 2, entries 1–6). As regards the other amine, gratifyingly, morpholine also worked as the source of amine well to afford the desired Mannich products (Table 2, entries 7–12). More importantly, the excellent catalytic properties of APF-2 in the construction of C-N bonds were comparable with those of the previous results catalysed by POMs catalysts [46]. To investigate the durability and recyclability of the APFs catalysts, the repeated experiments have been conducted in the three-component reaction of phenylacetylene, formaldehyde and morpholine under the optimum conditions in Table 2 and the corresponding results were shown in Fig. 5. After each catalytic cycle, the catalyst was separated from the reaction mixture by centrifugation, washed with ethanol three times and dried at 50 ℃ for 2 h, and then stored under vacuum. The conversions of phenylacetylene for the three consecutive runs were satisfactory in terms of Mannich product yields (Fig. 5a).

  Table 2

  

  Table 2.  Substrate scope for Mannich reaction.^a

  DownLoad: CSV

  Figure 5

  

  Figure 5.  (a) The results of Mannich reaction catalyzed by APF-2 in three run experiments. (b) The XPS of Ag in APF-2 before and after three runs reaction. (c) The XPS of V in APF-2 before and after three runs reaction. (d) The proposed mechanism for Mannich reaction catalyzed by APF-2.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To prove the stability of the catalyst, XPS, PXRD and FT-IR spectra of APF-2 were recorded, respectively, and the results showed that no significant change was observed in either of them and all the characteristic bands and peaks of these spectra were remaining unaltered before and after the oxidation reaction (Figs. 5b and c, Figs. S7 and S8 in Supporting information). The result strongly suggests that the hybrid APF-2 is durable and recyclable in the Mannich reaction. Mechanistically, according to the above experiments and previous results, we proposed a plausible mechanism catalyzed by APF-2 depicted in Fig. 5d [47, 48]. First, APF-2 promoted the formation of intermediate B by the interaction of the phenylacetylene and catalyst. Second, species B activated the triple bond to form Ag-acetylide intermediate C [49, 50]. Third, C species reacted with the imnium ion originated by the condensation reaction of formaldehyde and piperidine to achieve the desired Mannich product.

  In consideration of APFs having the potential to be an oxidation catalyst, the selective oxidation of CEES was investigated under mild conditions, which was considered an effective protocol for detoxification of simulant sulfur mustard. In a typical oxidation of CEES, the reaction conditions are as followed: 0.25 mmol CEES, 5 µmol catalysts, 0.3 mmol H₂O₂, 0.5 mL ethanol at room temperature and the progress of the catalytic reaction was detected by GC, and the product was confirmed by GC–MS. The preliminary optimized results are presented in Fig. 6. As shown in Fig. 6a, a blank experiment without catalyst exhibited less than 20% conversion, nevertheless, when APFs 1–3 were used as the catalysts, the conversions of CEES reached 76%, 99% and 91%, respectively. These results showed that although APF-2 has a smaller amount of molar ratio of Ag to polyoxovanadates (4.5:1) than that of APF-3 (5:1), the conversion of CEES using APF-2 as the catalyst was still higher than that of APF-3, demonstrating that the coordination environment of Ag⁺ and the POVs structures played an important role in their detoxification activity of simulant sulfur mustard.

  Figure 6

  

  Figure 6.  (a) Reaction conditions: CEES (0.25 mmol), H₂O₂ (0.3 mmol), EtOH (0.5 mL), catalysts (5 μmol), room temperature, 30 min. a: blank; b: AgNO₃; c: V₂O₅; d: APF- 1; e: APF-2; f: APF-3. (b) Kinetics of the oxidation of CEES with APF-2 (black); APF-2 was filtered from the reaction mixture after 15 min (red). (c) The IR spectra of APF-2 before and after three runs oxidation of CEES. (d) The GC spectrum of before and after the oxidation of CEES catalyzed by APF-2.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Consequently, to illuminate the role of each active component of APF-2 in the oxidative degradation of CEES, a series of control experiments were performed. When using AgNO₃ and TBA₆V₁₀O₂₈ as catalyst comparisons under similar conditions and the results were exhibited in the Fig. 6a. It was clearly that the highest conversion of 99% could be reached with APF-2, while for AgNO₃, V₂O₅ after 30 min, the conversions were far below that of APF-2, respectively. Overall, we concluded that the high-efficiency catalytic performance of APF-2 in oxidation of CEES might be resulted by the synergy of Ag⁺ sites and decavanadate center after coordination polymerization. These results indicated that almost all of the CEES was removed and APF-2 could be employed as an effective catalyst in the removal of CEES, compared to the POVs-based inorganic-organic hybrids [Co(bib)]{V₂O₆} and [Ni(bib)₂]{V₂O₆} (bib = 1, 4-bis(1H-imidazoly-1-yl)benzene) [51, 52].

  To evaluate the reusability and stability of APF-2 for its actual application, the leaching test and three runs reusability of oxidation of CEES were carried out under the optimal conditions. The results exhibited that catalyst was filtered from the reaction solution after 15 min, and the conversion of CEES in the resulting solution was basically maintained under identical conditions for another 15 min (Fig. 6b). Remarkably, in the reusability experiment, the conversion was reduced by only 2% after three runs of catalytic reactions [Conv. of CEES: 99% (first run), 98% (second run), 97% (third run)] (Fig. S9 in Supporting information). Furthermore, the IR proved that the structural integrity of APF-2 after catalysis remained unchanged, indicating that the catalyst was an excellent heterogeneous catalyst for CEES oxidation under mild conditions (Fig. 6c). Additionally, GC were also tested before and after the degradation of CEES in the presence of APF-2 as catalyst and the results were given in Fig. 6d, which suggested that simulant sulfur mustard was almost completely converted to the corresponding nontoxic CEESO products within 30 min under mild conditions.

  According to previous investigations on the oxidation CEES of POMs, the POVs can generate active peroxo-metal species in the presence of H₂O₂, which plays an important role in the oxidative reaction [53, 54]. Therefore, we speculated the resulting peroxo-vanaium species are the active species in the detoxification of CEES over APF-2. Based on the above experiment and previous reports, we proposed a possible mechanism of CEES degradation with APF-2 (Fig. S23 in Supporting information). The vanadium of APF-2 interacts with H₂O₂ to produce active peroxovanadium species (Fig. S24 in Supporting information) [55, 56], which subsequently is attacked by the sulfur atom of CEES, thus achieving the corresponding nontoxic product CEESO.

  In summary, three APFs with imidazole-modified Ag-complexes as the cations and POVs as the anion were successfully synthesized and fully characterized. Interestingly, the molar ratios of Ag to POVs in the three compounds are controlled by using different imidazole N-containing ligands. More importantly, APF-2 exhibits excellent bifunctional catalytic performance in the construction C-N bonds and oxidative detoxification of CEES under mild conditions. The high efficiencies validated APFs not only expands the structure of the POVs but also provides insight into the design of bifunctional catalysts with synergistic catalytic properties for organic reactions. Investigations on using these APFs catalysts for other catalytic reactions are in progress.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors report no declarations of interest.

  Acknowledgments

  The work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21871125, 21871026 and 22001034); the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (Nos. ZR2019MB043 and ZR2019QB022), and the Construction Project of Quality Curriculum for Postgraduate Education of Shandong Province (No. SDYKC19057).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.09.042.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     Q. Wang, Y. Su, L. Li, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 (2016) 1257–1272 doi: 10.1039/C5CS00534E

  2. [2]

     J.M. Ganley, P.R.D. Murray, R.R. Knowles, ACS Catal. 10 (2020) 11712–11738 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c03567

  3. [3]

     G. Yang, Y. Liu, X. Lin, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 354–357. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.008

  4. [4]

     G. Yang, Y. Liu, K. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 3233–3236 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.07.018

  5. [5]

     J.A. Walker, K.L. Vickerman, J.N. Humke, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 10228–10231 doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b06191

  6. [6]

     W. Yao, Y. Zhang, H. Zhu, C. Ge, D. Wang, Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 701–705 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.08.049

  7. [7]

     W. Wen, M.J. Luo, Y. Yuan, et al., Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 5372 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19245-3

  8. [8]

     B.M. Trost, J.S. Tracy, T. Yusoontorn, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 2370–2374 doi: 10.1002/anie.201913927

  9. [9]

     H.J. Zhang, Y.C. Xie, L. Yin, Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 1699 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09750-5

  10. [10]

      J.J. Tian, N. Liu, Q.F. Liu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 3054–3059 doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c00006

  11. [11]

      C.C. Meyer, E. Ortiz, M.J. Krische, Chem. Rev. 120 (2020) 3721–3748 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00053

  12. [12]

      N.F. Curtis, Coord. Chem. Rev. 366 (2018) 109–134 doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.01.020

  13. [13]

      X.Y. Zhang, P.H. Dou, W.Y. Lu, et al., Chem. Commun. 57 (2021) 2927–2930 doi: 10.1039/d0cc08131k

  14. [14]

      R. Gil-San-Millan, E. López-Maya, M. Hall, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (2017) 23967–23973 doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b06341

  15. [15]

      M. Florent, D.A. Giannakoudakis, T.J. Bandosz, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 272 (2020) 119038 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119038

  16. [16]

      S.G. Xia, Z. Zhang, J.N. Wu, et al., Appl. Catal. B284 (2021) 119703 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119703

  17. [17]

      L. Qiao, M. Song, A. Geng, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 30 (2019) 1273–1276 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.01.024

  18. [18]

      M. Zhao, X.Y. Zhu, Y.Z. Li, et al., Tungsten 4 (2022) 121–129. doi: 10.1007/s42864-021-00073-x

  19. [19]

      P. Mialane, C. Mellot-Draznieks, P. Gairola, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 (2021) 6152–6220 doi: 10.1039/d0cs00323a

  20. [20]

      B.E. Petel, R.L. Meyer, M.L. Maiola, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 1049–1056 doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11874

  21. [21]

      H. Bian, X. Zhang, H. Zhao, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 30 (2019) 1097–1099 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.01.030

  22. [22]

      G.P. Yang, X.L. Zhang, Y.F. Liu, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front., 8 (2021) 4650–4656. doi: 10.1039/d1qi00485a

  23. [23]

      H.R. Tian, Y.W. Liu, Z. Zhang, et al., Green Chem. 22 (2020) 248–255 doi: 10.1039/c9gc03626a

  24. [24]

      J.P. Cao, Y.S. Xue, N.F. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 19487–19497 doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11146

  25. [25]

      Z. Xu, K. Chen, M. Li, et al., Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 5287–5290 doi: 10.1039/d0cc01676d

  26. [26]

      W.J. Zhang, Z. Liu, K.P. Song, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 4231–4237 doi: 10.1002/anie.202013681

  27. [27]

      Z. Wang, M. Ashafaq, Y.F. Lu, et al., Inorg. Chem. 60 (2021) 2899–2904 doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00160

  28. [28]

      Z. Wang, L.M. Zheng, M. Jagodič, et al., Inorg. Chem. 59 (2020) 3004–3011 doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b03365

  29. [29]

      Y. Hou, H. Pang, C.J. Gómez-García, et al., Inorg. Chem. 58 (2019) 16028–16039 doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02516

  30. [30]

      C. Deng, C. Sun, Z. Wang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 12659–12663 doi: 10.1002/anie.202003143

  31. [31]

      Z. Wang, J.W. Liu, H.F. Su, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 17884–17890 doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b09460

  32. [32]

      J.W. Liu, L. Feng, H.F. Su, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 1600–1603 doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12777

  33. [33]

      M. Zhao, S. Huang, Q. Fu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 20031–20036 doi: 10.1002/anie.202007122

  34. [34]

      Z. Wang, H.T. Sun, M. Kurmoo, et al., Chem. Sci. 10 (2019) 4862–4867 doi: 10.1039/c8sc05666h

  35. [35]

      K. Yonesato, H. Ito, D. Yokogawa, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 16361–16365 doi: 10.1002/anie.202008402

  36. [36]

      K. Yonesato, S. Yamazoe, D. Yokogawa, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 16994–16998 doi: 10.1002/anie.202106786

  37. [37]

      H. Liu, C.Y. Song, R.W. Huang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 3699–3703 doi: 10.1002/anie.201511765

  38. [38]

      Y.P. Xie, T.C.W. Mak, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 3760–3763 doi: 10.1021/ja1112035

  39. [39]

      A.A. Shmakova, A.S. Berezin, P.A. Abramov, et al., Inorg. Chem. 59 (2020) 1853–1862 doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b03064

  40. [40]

      X.X. Li, L.J. Zhang, C.Y. Cui, et al., Inorg. Chem. 57 (2018) 10323–10330 doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01528

  41. [41]

      X. Huang, J. Li, G. Shen, et al., Dalton Trans. 47 (2018) 726–733 doi: 10.1039/C7DT03898D

  42. [42]

      T.C. Stamatatos, S.P. Perlepes, C.P. Raptopoulou, et al., Dalton Trans. (2009) 3354–3362 doi: 10.1039/b900716d

  43. [43]

      C. Sun, B.K. Teo, C. Deng, et al., Coord. Chem. Rev. 427 (2021) 213576 doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213576

  44. [44]

      X. Huang, X. Gu, H. Zhang, et al., J. CO₂ Util. 45 (2021) 101419 doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101419

  45. [45]

      H. An, J. Zhang, S. Chang, et al., Inorg. Chem. 59 (2020) 10578–10590 doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00999

  46. [46]

      X. Huang, X. Gu, Y. Qi, et al., Chin. J. Chem. 39 (2021) 2495–2503 doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202100145

  47. [47]

      L.P. Zorba, G.C. Vougioukalakis, Coord. Chem. Rev. 429 (2021) 213603 doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213603

  48. [48]

      O. Prakash, H. Joshi, U. Kumar, et al., Dalton Trans. 44 (2015) 1962–1968 doi: 10.1039/C4DT02813A

  49. [49]

      M.T. Chen, B. Landers, O. Navarro, Org. Biomol. Chem. 10 (2012) 2206–2208 doi: 10.1039/c2ob06900h

  50. [50]

      P. Li, M. Wang, Y. Zhang, et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 49 (2008), 6650–6654 doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.09.026

  51. [51]

      H.R. Tian, Z. Zhang, S.M. Liu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A8 (2020) 12398–12405 doi: 10.1039/d0ta00537a

  52. [52]

      H.R. Tian, Z. Zhang, T.Y. Dang, et al., Inorg. Chem. 60 (2021) 840–845 doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02890

  53. [53]

      N. Zhen, J. Dong, Z. Lin, et al., Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 13967–13970 doi: 10.1039/d0cc06277d

  54. [54]

      J. Dong, J. Hu, Y. Chi, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 4473–4477 doi: 10.1002/anie.201700159

  55. [55]

      Y. Hou, H. An, S. Chang, et al., Catal. Sci. Technol. 9 (2019), 2445–2455 doi: 10.1039/c9cy00094a

  56. [56]

      Y.J. Hou, H.Y. An, Y.M. Zhang, et al., ACS Catal. 8 (2018) 6062–6069 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00972

• 

  Figure 1  Simplified ball-and-stick representation of the syntheses of APFs 1–3. Color code: Ag, turquiose; V, green; N, blue; O, red; C, gray

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  Simplified ball-and-stick and polyhedron representation of APF-1. (a) The asymmetric unit of APF-1. (b) The coordination environment of Ag1 atom. (c) The coordination environment of Ag2 atom. (d) The 1D chain structure of APF-1. Color code: Ag, turquiose; V polyhedron, red; N, blue; O, red; C, gray

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  Simplified ball-and-stick and polyhedron representation of APF-2. (a) The coordination environment of Ag1 atom; (b) the coordination environment of Ag3 atom; (c) the coordination environment of Ag4 atom; (d) the coordination environment of Ag5 atom; (e) the 2D network structure of APF-2. Color code: Ag, turquiose; V polyhedron, red; N, blue; O, red; C, gray. The 1-eIM ligands are removed for clarity.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  Simplified ball-and-stick and polyhedron representation of APF-3. (a) The coordination environment of Ag1 atom. (b) The coordination environment of Ag2 atom. (c) The coordination environment of Ag3 atom. (d) The 2D network structure of APF-3. Color code: Ag, turquiose; V polyhedron, red; N, blue; O, red; C, gray. The 1-pIM ligands are removed for clarity.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  (a) The results of Mannich reaction catalyzed by APF-2 in three run experiments. (b) The XPS of Ag in APF-2 before and after three runs reaction. (c) The XPS of V in APF-2 before and after three runs reaction. (d) The proposed mechanism for Mannich reaction catalyzed by APF-2.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 6  (a) Reaction conditions: CEES (0.25 mmol), H₂O₂ (0.3 mmol), EtOH (0.5 mL), catalysts (5 μmol), room temperature, 30 min. a: blank; b: AgNO₃; c: V₂O₅; d: APF- 1; e: APF-2; f: APF-3. (b) Kinetics of the oxidation of CEES with APF-2 (black); APF-2 was filtered from the reaction mixture after 15 min (red). (c) The IR spectra of APF-2 before and after three runs oxidation of CEES. (d) The GC spectrum of before and after the oxidation of CEES catalyzed by APF-2.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Table 1.  The effect of different parameters on Mannich reaction.^a

  下载: 导出CSV

  Table 2.  Substrate scope for Mannich reaction.^a

  下载: 导出CSV
•