Ag-single atoms modified S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x for photocatalytic activation of peroxymonosulfate for bisphenol A degradation
Tian Wang , Jianjun Zhou , Wenjuan Wang , Yunqing Zhu , Junfeng Niu
Bisphenol A (BPA) is well-known as an endocrine-disrupting chemical (EDC) that can mimic estrogen and interact with its receptors. It has great potential to cause hazardous health and ecologic effects even at doses lower than the safety level (50 mg kg−1 day−1 by FDA [1-3]. In the past two decades, BPA has been widely used in manufacturing plastics, paper, medical equipment, electronics, and clothes, and every year more than 6.0 × 109 pounds of BPA are produced [4, 5]. Therefore, it is necessary to find an efficient and environmentally friendly treatment method to eliminate BPA.
Fenton-like process is promised as an efficient technology for treatment of refractory organic pollutants because of its strong oxidation capability and environmental benignness [6, 7]. Different from the traditional •OH based Fenton technology, sulfate radicals (SO4•‒) for its high redox potential (E0 = 2.5-3.1 eV) and selectively oxidation capability, has attracted plenty of attention in recent years [8, 9]. In addition, for sulfate radical based Fenton-like technology, the 2-9 pH adoptive range and 30-40 µs half-life also made it more efficient in environmental remediation [10]. Furthermore, to increase its catalytic efficiency, several methods, like UV irradiation, transition metal ions (like Co2+, Cu2+, or Fe2+) and metal oxides, have been proposed as approaches for accelerating the reaction of SO4•‒ generation [11-13].
Recently, photocatalytic Fenton process by coupling of potassium peroxymonosulfate (PMS) with photocatalysts for enhancing the SO4•‒ radicals generation has been studied as a new and efficient approach. TiO2, Co3O4, BiVO4, C3N4, and manganese oxide molecular sieve were all investigated as photo-Fenton catalysts for contaminants degradation under visible light irradiation [14-16]. However, the development of efficient and stable photocatalysts for the generation of SO4•‒ is still highly desired. Single-atom catalysts (SACs) by engineering the nanoparticle size to extremely small as single atom to achieve a maximum amount of unsaturated coordinated atoms have been widely studied in recent years [17, 18]. The isolated atoms in SACs are unsaturatedly coordinated and exhibited unique physicochemical properties [19, 20]. In the photocatalytic reaction, the atomically dispersed atoms are exposed in the reaction situation and participated in the reaction as high reactive sites [21]. So the atomic efficiency would be 100%, a maximum value in theory.
Herein, defective S, N-TiO2-x with a large number of uniformly distributed surface oxygen vacancies was adopted as substrate for preparation of single-atom Ag photocatalysts. As shown in Fig. 1a, the S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x exhibits a lattice spacing of 0.37 nm corresponding to (101) facet of TiO2 [22]. Compared with TiO2-x, the lattice spacing is slightly increased (Fig. S1 in Supporting information) [23], which may be ascribed to the doping of sulfur and nitrogen. Fig. 1b is the HAADF-STEM diagram of Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x). It can be seen that Ag atoms exist as single atoms on the surface of the S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x, and the dispersion is uniform. From the EDS mapping images of Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x) (Fig. 1c), it can be seen that the four elements are uniformly distributed in the material. The Ag element was isolatedly dispersed on the surface, which further proves that the silver atoms are loaded successfully and are evenly distributed as silver atoms on S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x surface. The elements that S and N, Ag can be clearly observed in the EDS diagram of Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x), which proves the successful preparation of this material (Fig. S2 in Supporting information). As shown in Fig. 1d, the characteristic diffraction peaks of the prepared material Agz/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x) are located at 25.3°, 37.8°, 48.1°, 53.9°, 55.1°, 62.7° and 75.0° respectively, corresponding to the (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), (204) and (215) crystal planes of the anatase phase TiO2-x proved that the anatase phase photocatalytic material was successfully prepared [24, 25]. Fig. 1e shows the Raman spectra of TiO2-x and S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x with different Ag loadings. The characteristic Raman signal peak position of TiO2-x was marked in Fig. S3 (Supporting information). It can be seen from the figure that the characteristic Raman signals are located at 149 cm−1, 196 cm−1, 391 cm−1, 513 cm−1, 632 cm−1 [26]. There is the strongest Raman signal at 149 cm−1, indicating that the prepared material exhibits the Raman characteristic band of anatase phase TiO2-x. This result is consistent with X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The Raman vibration mode of anatase TiO2-x is 3Eg + 2B1g + A1g, and the oscillation peaks at 149 cm−1, 196 cm−1 and 632 cm−1 correspond to the Eg vibration mode, the oscillation peak at 391 cm−1 and 513 cm−1 corresponds to the B1g oscillation mode [27]. Compared with the S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x Raman signal, the Raman band of Agz/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x) shows no red shift or blue shift with the increase of Ag loading suggesting that the loading of Ag did not change the structure of S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x. Fig. 1f shows the high-resolution XPS peaks of Ag in Agz/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x), as shown in this figure, the binding energies of Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 orbitals are 368.1 eV and 374.1 eV respectively [28]. The difference in binding energy between the two orbitals is 6 eV, indicating that Ag exists as zero valence state.
The g factor of the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signal for all the samples (Fig. 2) is 2.003, which is classified into EPR signal of oxygen vacancies [29]. The S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x has the highest intensity of EPR signal, which indicated that the concentration of oxygen vacancies is highest in all the samples. After loading Ag species, the EPR signal intensity of oxygen vacancies gradually decreased with the increase of the loading amount of Ag. But when the loading amount of Ag is higher than 0.81%, it no longer follows the above-mentioned rules. This is due to the formation of Ag nanoclusters or nanoparticles on the surface of S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x, only a small amount of Ag occupies oxygen vacancies.
The transient photocurrent (15 µA/cm2) of S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x is greater than that of pure TiO2-x (12 µA/cm2), this is due to the fact that S6+ can be reduced to more stable S4+ [30]. Doped S6+ can increase the separation rate of photo-generated electrons and holes. N replaces O2− by bonding or enters into the crystal lattice to cause distortion of the TiO2-x lattice. When S and N co-doping interaction in the TiO2-x band gap, a new energy level is formed, which improves the separation efficiency of the catalyst for photo-generated carriers [31]. After Ag loading, Ag0.08/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x), Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x), Ag0.58/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x) and Ag0.81/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x) show the transient photocurrents of 28, 42, 23, 14 µA/cm2, respectively (Fig. 3a). It was found that the transient photocurrent of Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x) was the largest, which was about 3.5 times that of TiO2-x and 3 times that of S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x, indicating that single atom Ag can improve the separation rate of photo-generated electrons and holes [32], and in the photo-Fenton process, it can also increase the transport and capture photo-generated electrons. The DRS spectrum can further prove that the material Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x) has the highest light absorption (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). However, the increasing of Ag loading amount resulted a decreasing of transient photocurrent, which is due to the excessive Ag prior to form Ag particles with lower dispersity and low-density of carrier separation centers. It can be seen from Fig. 3b that the radius of the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy curve of the S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x modified by co-doping of TiO2-x with S and N is small, indicating that the electrochemical impedance is small and the interface charge transfer is faster, and the separation effect of photo-generated electrons and holes is better [33]. Compared with pure S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x electrochemical impedance, the Ag-loaded S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x (Agz/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x)) light Fenton catalytic materials have low electrochemical impedance, relatively fast interface charge transfer, and long carrier lifetime [34]. The electrochemical impedance of the single-atom catalytic material Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x) is the smallest, which is nearly 1/4 of the electrochemical impedance of S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x, is maximized the atomic utilization rate, it can make the separation effect of photo-generated electrons and holes best, which is conducive to the improvement of catalytic activity.
The photo-Fenton degradation of BPA at initial concentration of 15 mg/L with molar ratios of Oxone to BPA at 2.2 is shown in Fig. 4a. In case of PMS under visible light irradiation, no obvious degradation of BPA was observed. By activation of PMS in dark with Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x), 53.88% of BPA and 19.73% of total organic carbon (TOC) were removed after 120 minutes of contact time (Fig. 4b). Once visible light irradiation was applied, 100% of BPA and 48.73% of TOC were removed at the end of treatment. Based on the data, the degradation of BPA was fitted with the pseudo-first order kinetic model (Fig. S5 in Supporting information), and the kinetic constant was 0.032 min−1 which is two to three times higher than its counterpart. While comparing the catalysts with different Ag loading amount, Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x) displayed the highest catalytic efficiency of BPA and TOC removal in the 120 min reaction. Tables S1 and S2 (Supporting information) listed the BPA and TOC removal of all samples in the photo-Fenton-like process. It suggested that the high catalytic efficiency was ascribed to the isolated silver atoms in the single atom catalysts. The cycling test (Fig. 4c) implied that Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/ TiO2-x) SAC shown high stability in the photo-Fenton degradation of BPA, and after four times cycling experiments, the catalytic efficiency only shown slightly decrease.
The EPR spectrum was used to detect the active radicals during the photo-Fenton degradation of BPA with Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x) using DMPO as spin trapping agent. As shown in Fig. 4d, the signals of DMPO-OH and DMPO-SO4 adducts were both observed in the reaction. It means that •OH and SO4•‒ co-participate in the degradation process of BPA [35, 36]. With the time increasing, the signal intensity was firstly enhanced and then reduced. It agreed with the reaction trend that during the initial stage of the reaction, the generated active radicals were fast reacted with BPA molecule resulting in a high reaction rate, and EPR spectum showed no singal. After 30 min, the reaction rate decreased and the DMPO trapped radicals were increased. The SO4•‒ reacted with H2O to form plenty of •OH. So the signal intensity was enhanced correspondingly. Then at the end of reaction, PMS was used up. The signal of the radicals were both reduced, which further confirmed that the •OH was generated from SO4•‒ [37].
In this work, the single atomic photocatalysts were successfully prepared and tested in the photo-Fenton-like system for BPA degradation under visible-light irradiation. In this system, the SACs labeled as Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x) possessed high-efficiency for photo-generated carrier separation and transportation, which resulted in a high yield of SO4•‒ radicals and also the conversion to •OH for effective mineralization of BPA. Meanwhile, photocatalytic process promoted the reduction of the isolated Ag atoms from Ag+ to Ag0 to ensure the efficient activation of PMS.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Thia work is financial supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 21876105), Key Research & Development Program Projects of Shaanxi Province (No. 2019SF-252), the Startup Foundation for Advanced Talents of Shaanxi University of Science and Technology.
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.085.
H. Wang, L.P. Liu, J.Y. Wang, et al., Sci. Total Environ.601 (2017) 1733-1742.
Y. Shang, X. Xu, B.Y. Gao, S.B. Wang, X.G. Duan, Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 (2021) 5281-5322. doi: 10.1039/d0cs01032d
P.P. Qiu, T. Zhao, X.H. Zhu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 1456-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.09.061
K.A. Thayer, D.R. Doerge, D. Hunt, et al., Environ. Int. 83 (2015) 107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.06.008
P. Ye, D.M. Wu, M.Y. Wang, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 428 (2018) 131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.107
D. Meral, Ultrason. Sonochem. 40 (2018) 110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.04.040
J.L. Wang, S.Z. Wang, Chem. Eng. J. 334 (2018) 1502-1517. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.059
Y. Soltanabadi, M. Jourshabani, Z. Shariatinia, Sep. Purif. Technol. 202 (2018) 227-241. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.03.019
Y. Shang, X. Xu, Q.Y. Yue, B.Y. Gao, Y.W. Li, Environ. Sci. 7 (2020) 1444-1453.
X.M. Lei, M.H. You, F. Pan, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 30 (2019) 2216-2220. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.05.039
F. Chen, X. Jiang, L. Zhang, R. Lang, B. Qiao, Chin. J. Catal. 39 (2018) 893-898. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63047-5
H. Zhang, G. Liu, L. Shi, J. Ye, Adv. Energy Mater. 8 (2018) 1701343. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201701343
T. Wang, Y.Q. Zhu, Z.Y. Luo, Y.X. Li, C.Y. Wang, Environ. Chem. Lett. 19 (2021) 1815-1821. doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-01144-0
Y.Q. Zhu, T. Wang, T. Xu, Y.X. Li, C.Y. Wang, Appl. Surf. Sci. 464 (2019) 36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.061
F. Chen, X.L. Wu, L. Yang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 394 (2020) 124904. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124904
A. Abdelhaleem, W. Chu, Chem. Eng. J. 338 (2018) 411-421. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.036
Y.Q. Zhu, T. W, W.J. Wang, et al., Environ. Chem. Lett. 17 (2018) 481-486. doi: 10.1515/9783110489514-014
M. Taherinia, M. Nasiri, E. Abedini, H.R. Pouretedal, J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 15 (2018) 1301-1310. doi: 10.1007/s13738-018-1329-8
A. Kadam, T. Salunkhe, H. Kim, S.W. Lee, Appl. Surf. Sci. 518 (2020) 169-4332.
A. Brindha, T. Sivakumar, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A340 (2017) 146-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.03.010
Y.H. Tian, Y.Z. Wu, Q.Y. Yi, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 128644 (2021) 1385-8947.
P.O. Diez, S. Giannakis, J. Rodríguez-Chueca, et al., Water Res. 186 (2020) 116387. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116387
L. Devi, M. Srinivas, M.L. ArunaKumari, J. Water Process Eng. 13 (2016) 117-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.08.004
T. Soltani, A. Tayyebi, B. Lee, Appl. Surf. Sci. 441 (2018) 853-861. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.063
B.F. Zhang, M.T. Zhang, L. Zhang, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 594 (2021) 635-649. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.03.066
H.B. Qiu, P.C. Guo, L. Yuan, G.P. Sheng, Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 2614-2618. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.08.014
J.J. Qi, J.Z. Liu, F.B. Sun, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 1814-1818. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.026
H. Yu, L. Ye, T. Zhang, H. Zhou, T. Zhao, RSC Adv. 7 (2017) 15265-15271. doi: 10.1039/C6RA27187A
X. Kong, Z. Peng, R. Jiang, et al., ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3 (2020) 1373-1381. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.9b02217
G.H. Li, Y.Y. Sun, Q.M. Zhang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 410 (2021) 128397. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128397
T. Li, A. Abdelhaleem, W. Chu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 411 (2021) 128450. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128450
T. Suwannaruang, P. Kidkhunthod, N. Chanlek, S. Soontaranon, K. Wantala, Appl. Surf. Sci. 478 (2019) 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.158
J. Wang, G.H. Wang, B. Cheng, J.G. Yu, J.J. Fan, Chin. J. Catal. 42 (2021) 56-68. doi: 10.2991/jrnal.k.210521.013
R.T. Bento, O.V. Correa, M.F. Pillis, Mater. Chem. Phys. 261 (2021) 124231. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124231
Y.K. Park, B.J. Kim, S.M. Jeong, et al., Environ. Res. 188 (2020) 109630. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109630
N. Kovalevskiy, D. Selishchev, D. Svintsitskiy, et al., Catal. Commun. 134 (2020) 105841. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2019.105841
X.Q. An, Q.W. Tang, H.C. Lan, H.J. Liu, J.H. Qu, Appl. Catal. B244 (2019) 407-413. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.063
Figure 1 (a) HRTEM diagram of S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x. (b) HAADF-STEM diagram of Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x). (c) Corresponding EDS mapping of Ag, S, N, Ti elements, respectively of Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x). (d) XRD pattern of Agz/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x). (e) Raman spectra of Agz/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x). (f) XPS spectra of Ag0.23/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x): Ag 3d.
Figure 3 (a) Transient photocurrent response. (b) EIS Nyquist plots of Agz/(S1.66-N1.91/TiO2-x).
扫一扫看文章
扫一扫关注我们
DownLoad:
下载:
下载: