Recent advances in the improvement of g-C3N4 based photocatalytic materials

Yupeng Xing Xiaoke Wang Shuhua Hao Xueli Zhang Xiao Wang Wenxuan Ma Gang Zhao Xijin Xu

Citation:  Yupeng Xing, Xiaoke Wang, Shuhua Hao, Xueli Zhang, Xiao Wang, Wenxuan Ma, Gang Zhao, Xijin Xu. Recent advances in the improvement of g-C3N4 based photocatalytic materials[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2021, 32(1): 13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.011 shu

Recent advances in the improvement of g-C3N4 based photocatalytic materials

English

  • Energy is the cornerstone of the development of modern society [1]. With the continuous advancement of industrialization and urbanization, the demand for fossil energy such as petroleum, coal and natural gas is increasing [2]. The competition for depletable fossil energy resources is gradually escalating into a regional hotspot issue. More and more traditional and non-traditional problems are highlighted: the energy crisis is attracting more and more people's attention, which requires the development of sustainable energy to replace traditional fossil fuels [3]. The need for clean energy is becoming more and more urgent [4]. In the exploration of many alternative energy sources, solar energy is a clean, inexhaustible energy, which is considered to be the most potential and the most environmentally friendly renewable energy source. This is conducive to the sustainable development of the environment and energy [5-7]. In addition to using photovoltaic panels to generate electricity directly, another direction with great development prospects is to develop efficient photocatalysts. The photocatalyst, illuminated by sunlight, absorbs photons from the sun and split water into hydrogen and oxygen [8-15]. It is a simple, environmentally friendly way to deal with our energy issues. It is also a hot topic for scholars in relevant fields to study. The problem is that although various photocatalysts are constantly emerging, their photocatalytic efficiency is not satisfactory: usually less than 1%. However, the photocatalytic efficiency of photocatalysts suitable for industrial applications should be above 10% [16]. Although there is still a long way to go to realize the practical application of industrialization, after so many years of exploration, there are many encouraging achievements in the field of photocatalytic hydrolysis in recent years.

    There are many members in the large family of photocatalytic materials, including zero-dimensional granular photocatalytic materials [17, 18], one-dimensional linear photocatalytic materials [19-21], two-dimensional layered photocatalytic materials [22-28] and three-dimensional bulk photocatalytic materials [29, 30]. Among these photocatalytic materials, g-C3N4 have been attracted extensive attention in recent years due to its excellent performance such as highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen generation, water oxidation (for making hydrogen peroxide), carbon dioxide reduction, organic pollutant degradation and artificial photosynthesis [31-40]. Because the earth is rich in metal-free elements for the synthesis of this photocatalytic material, good photochemical stability, and thermal stability, as well as easy to use synthesis of melamine, urea, thiourea, etc. [41]. All the above mentioned are the great advantages of this material [42]. However, the bulk g-C3N4 obtained after direct calcination of the precursor is always limited by its low specific surface area, high photoexcited electron and hole recombination rate, and limited light absorption in the visible range [43]. Therefore, the modification and optimization of g-C3N4 have important guiding significance for the future research direction of photocatalytic hydrogen production.

    In 1972, the first year of the era of photocatalysis, Fujishima discovered that water could be decomposed into hydrogen and oxygen by UV irradiation on TiO2 electrodes [44], thus opening up a new research field: Photocatalysis. After that, people gradually realized that hydrogen and oxygen reacted to form water is an exothermic reaction. Producing hydrogen and oxygen from water is the reverse reaction, which requires a lot of energy from the outside world [45]. Therefore, pure water cannot perform photocatalytic reaction spontaneously under light irradiation, which requires a photocatalyst to drive and convert the scattered solar energy with low energy density into hydrogen energy which is easier to store and high energy density. In order for the photocatalyst to work, the photon energy of incident light must be greater than the band gap of the semiconductor photocatalyst, so that the electrons in the valence band (VB) will be transferred to the conduction band (CB). And then it has holes in VB and electrons in CB. Then these holes and electrons migrate to the surface of the photocatalyst and the redox reaction occurs at the surface-active site of the contact surface between the photocatalyst and water [46].

    With the development of photocatalytic materials, people have never stopped their exploration of g-C3N4. In the past decades, people have done a lot of work. This review will be from the design and modification of g-C3N4 based photocatalytic materials according to these ideas: Change the content of carbon and nitrogen of carbon nitride (CN) material, and change the morphology of CN, element doping and construct heterostructure to introduce the latest methods of CN modification and the development of frontier.

    Graphite phase carbon nitride (g-C3N4) is a typical metal-free semiconductor, which has been widely studied due to its excellent applications in H2 production, environmental remediation, redox and photosynthesis [47-51]. Bulk g-C3N4 has thermal stability, chemical stability and photocatalytic stability and can be easily synthesized by direct thermal polymerization of nitrogen-rich precursors [52, 53]. However, the photocatalytic efficiency of the directly polymerized g-C3N4 material is far from satisfactory, which is due to the limited visible light absorption range, small surface area, limited active site and fast recombination [54-56]. Therefore, in order to improve the photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4, morphological construction rate of photogenerated carriers [57, 58], construction of Z-scheme heterostructure [59-61], doping of non-metallic or metallic elements [62, 63], introducing element defects or vacancies, protonation and other technologies can be used [64-66]. Inspired by two-dimensional graphene-like nanosheets of materials, efforts have also been made to convert bulk g-C3N4 into porous structures that compose thin nanosheets that help provide superior photocatalytic activity.

    2.1.1   Change the carbon concentration

    Jesus Barrio et al. [67] prepared solutions with different concentration gradients by adding 37% HCl of different volumes to a 1:1:0.1 (molar ratio) solution of cyanuric acid, melamine, barbiturate (Fig. 1, left). Mix with an automatic shaker and centrifuge. The powder was dried overnight at 60 ℃ in a vacuum furnace and then calcined for 4 h at 550 ℃ in an atmosphere of nitrogen. This synthesis method does not require any template method or other chemical treatment, but instead uses the intelligent design of supramolecular components to target the photophysical and catalytic properties of carbon nitride. The use of hydrogen-chlorine interactions leads to a carbon gradient through initial supramolecular assembly that can be transferred directly to the final carbonitriding material, thus reinforcing the importance of monomer sequences in the initial precursor. In supramolecular combinations, the rearrangement of monomers leads to the formation of unique energy level structures in the final material (Fig. 1, right), which has been proposed to improve the charge separation efficiency under light and thus the photocatalytic activity, resulting in higher hydrogen production. The photocatalytic efficiency of this material can reach 380 μmolg-1h-1.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Graphic representation of the proposed carbon nitride photoactive material from the supramolecular assembly and the corresponding energy-band structure. Reproduced with permission [67]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
    2.1.2   Change the nitrogen concentration

    Zhuge et al. [68] adjusted the electronic structure and energy band level of graphene phase carbon nitride by constructing different nitrogen content. In this way, prepared material has high photocatalytic activity. The team prepared nitrogen-rich CN (CN-NR 100) and nitrogen-deficient CN (CN-ND 500) by adjusting the nitrogen content in the CN material using isonicotinic acid (IA) as a precursor additive. Both materials can provide more photocatalytic sites, and the narrower band gap which can enhance the absorption of visible light and significantly improve the efficiency of carrier separation. Therefore, this material has good photocatalytic hydrogen production rates of 73 μmolg-1h-1 (about 4 times of bulk CN) and 120 μmolg-1h-1(about 6 times of bulk CN) respectively. The preparation process of these two materials is shown in Fig. 2.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (a) Synthesis process of nitrogen-rich CN and (b) nitrogen-deficient CN. Reproduced with permission [68]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH.

    Although the photocatalytic performance of the materials can be improved by adjusting the carbon to nitrogen ratio of the materials, there are also some problems such as high energy consumption and uneven photocatalytic materials. In addition, the photocatalytic efficiency improved by simple regulation of C-N ratio is very limited, and the hydrogen production efficiency is still very low. Therefore, this method limits the practical application of photocatalyst.

    The microstructure of materials, like two-dimensional materials, has a great influence on their properties [69-73]. Among two-dimensional photocatalyst preparation methods, thermal etching in air [74], ultrasonic stripping in various solutions [75-80] and GQDs-Assistant exfoliation [81] were used. To date, there have been many attempts to improve the photocatalytic performance of carbon nitride materials by changing their structure. Common means are: larger material through some ways (ultrasound processing) to tear into smaller pieces; by calcination and other means, the two-dimensional material is curled to form a tube; by making vacancy porous structure is prepared and even grow into other peculiar geometric structures. For example, nanospheres [82].

    2.2.1   Aerogel structure

    Zhang et al. [83] prepared aerogels composed of self-supporting carbon nitride nanolayer by a simple method combining hydrothermal condensation and thermal stripping. The curved nanosheets is easy to self-support. We can clearly see the microstructure of this material through SEM (Figs. 3a-d). The structure is so light that it can be placed on the stamens of a flower (Fig. 3b insert). It can maintain the specific surface and avoid aggregation; sufficient nitrogen vacancy makes the carbon nitride aerogels more effective than the bulk carbon nitride aerogels in catalyzing hydrogen evolution reaction. Self-supported aerogels composed of carbon nitride nanofilms can be used as bifunctional photocatalysts. Due to the large surface area and nitrogen vacancy, the photoreduction and photooxidation properties of aerogels are enhanced. The catalytic hydrogen production rate of carbon nitride aerogel was close to 4.2 mmol g-1h-1 (Fig. 3f). It is worth noting that compared with traditional carbon-based photocatalysts, carbon-based aerogels show excellent performance in photocatalysis. Through density functional theory and experimental results, it is proved that the introduction of nitrogen vacancy in carbon nitride leads to the formation of curved aerogel structure.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (a) SEM image of carbon nitride aerogel. (b) TEM image of carbon nitride aerogel. (c) STEM image of carbon nitride aerogel acquired in the HAADF mode. (d) The self-supported entangled nanolayers of the carbon nitride aerogel. (e) Typical time course of H2 production of carbon nitride aerogel and bulk carbon nitride under visible-light irradiation (λ > 420 nm). (f) Hydrogen evolution rate comparison of carbon nitride aerogel and control samples. (g) AQY values under different monochromatic light irradiation and UV-vis spectra of carbon nitride aerogel. (h) AQY comparison of carbon nitride aerogel. Reproduced with permission [83]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
    2.2.2   Porous g-C3N4 nanosheet

    Huang et al. [84] found an exciting, pre-designed non-template precursor (melamine) pretreatment scheme to achieve higher efficient photocatalytic reduction and oxidation of porous g-C3N4 nanosheets. During the hydrothermal pretreatment, thiourea solution was introduced to etch the surface of melamine, and porous g-C3N4 nanosheets were created (Fig. 4a). The microstructure and porosity of g-C3N4 can be adjusted only by controlling the thiourea dosage. The obtained porous g-C3N4 nanosheets not only increase the specific surface area, but also enhance the light absorption in the visible region. This work demonstrated by systematic characterization of charge behavior (transient photocurrent, linear scanning volt-amperes, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, photoluminescence, and surface photovoltage spectroscopy) that the porous nanosheet structure significantly enhanced the separation of photocarriers. Compared with bulk g-C3N4 material, the visible photocatalytic performance of porous g-C3N4 nanosheets in hydrogen evolution was significantly enhanced (about 3.3 times shown in Figs. 4b and c). The separation of photoelectrons from vacancies can be effectively promoted. For these reasons, the visible light catalytic hydrogen evolution performance of porous g-C3N4 was significantly enhanced.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (a) The preparation of porous g-C3N4 nanosheet. (b) Photocatalytic H2 production curves. (c) H2 production rate of CN with different thiourea dosage under visible light. Reproduced with permission [84]. Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry.
    2.2.3   Nanowires

    Ultra-long carbon nitride nanostructures have a high aspect ratio and a high surface-volume ratio, making them suitable for a variety of applications such as photocatalysts, water pollution degradation and sensors. Barrio et al. [85] reported the synthesis of carbon nitride filaments with a horizontal size of 4 cm using unique supramolecular spheres and graphitized carbon nitride (g-C3N4) monomer as reactants (Fig. 5b). The chemical structure of the supramolecular sphere and the growth process of nanowires are shown in Fig. 5a. The study by atomic scanning electron microscope showed that the g-C3N4 nanowires spontaneously began to grow from the sphere through roasting, in which the carbon nitride sphere was used as the substrate for growth. The material will spontaneously complete the rest of the assembly. Interestingly, nanowires grow differently at different temperatures (Fig. 5c). The carbon-rich g-C3N4 porous membrane is assembled. Nanofibers with different morphology, chemical composition and electronic properties can be excellent photocatalysts. g-C3N4 nanowires exhibit excellent photocatalytic activity in hydrogen production. This work provides an idea for the design of g-C3N4 nanostructures and materials for photocatalytic applications.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  (a) The preparation of carbon nitride nanowires. (b) Images of a 4 cm free-standing g-C3N4 filaments. (c) In situ heating SEM images at different temperatures. Reproduced with permission [85]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.
    2.2.4   Nano-fragments

    Vu et al. [86] modified the structure of bulk g-C3N4 with high-pressure atmosphere containing NH3 and H2O formed by condensation polymerization of urea. In the process of modification, bulk g-C3N4 was put into the reactor containing urea and heated to 205 ℃ for 36 h (The synthesis process is shown in Fig. 6c). The condensation of urea produces NH3 and water vapor. These reactions maintain an extremely high pressure in the reactor. Under high pressure, the carbon nitride skeleton was fractured into nanosheets. The photocatalytic hydrogen production efficiency of this material is 2598 μmolg-1h-1 (Figs. 6a and b).

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  (a) H2 production rate of CN and CN fragments samples and (b) H2 production of CN fragments for three cycles. (c) The preparation of CN nanofragments. Reproduced with permission [86]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.

    Photocatalysts with various morphologies have obvious advantages. For example, two-dimensional photocatalysts obtained by specific means have larger specific surface area and more reactive sites. Other elements introduced during the construct process can also play a decorative role. However, there are still some problems such as strict requirement on reaction temperature and uneven particle size of synthetic materials.

    Element doping is an effective strategy to adjust the band structure of photocatalysts and expand the light absorption region [87]. It has been widely used to adjust the optical absorption of internal bandgap structure by using non-metallic (B, O, S, I) doped g-C3N4 and to adjust the photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4 to promote the redox potential in visible light [88-92]. However, due to the quantum confinement effect that increases the band gap, the light absorption range of nanosheets generally decreases [93, 94]. Therefore, we can use elemental doping to adjust the band structure of g-C3N4, which can not only increase light absorption, but also improve charge separation [95]. The following reports will be made from oxygen doping, boron doping, phosphorus doping and halogen doping.

    2.3.1   Oxygen doping

    Wei et al. [96] greatly improved photocatalytic performance by doping oxygen in g-C3N4. The preparation of oxygen-doped g-C3N4 nanospheres is shown in Fig. 7. The amount of oxygen doping can be controlled by the copolymerization of the precursor. Therefore, oxygen-doped g-C3N4 showed excellent photocatalytic performance, with rhodamine B visible light degradation rate of 0.249 min-1 and hydrogen evolution rate of 3174 μmolg-1h-1, which were both 35 times and 4 times higher than the traditional g-C3N4. Zhang et al. [97] also doped different oxygen element concentrations by adding different proportions of oxalic acid to common carbon nitride materials. The efficiency of photocatalysis is improved effectively. The introduction of oxygen element can adjust the energy band structure and increase the absorption of visible light. These works provide new ways for the rational design and preparation of O doped g-C3N4 photocatalyst for the production of H2.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  The preparation of oxygen-doped g-C3N4 nanospheres. Reproduced with permission [96]. Copyright 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry.
    2.3.2   Boron doping

    Thaweesak et al. [98] prepared a new type of boron-doped graphitic carbon nitride nanometer material by one-pot thermal condensation. It is found that the best time catalytic hydrogen evolution activity is 1880 μmolg-1h-1 (λ > 400 nm), more than 12 times larger than bulk g-C3N4. The high photocatalytic performance is attributed to the combination of band structure construction and morphological control. By using sodium borohydride corrosion, He et al. [99] successfully doped boron into a line-shaped carbon nitride photocatalytic material. The photocatalytic performance was improved successfully. Boron doping not only reduces the band gap and absorbs more visible light, but also has a higher surface area than bulk g-C3N4, which greatly improves the photocatalytic performance. These works demonstrate two different synergistic strategies for the preparation of highly efficient non-metallic doped g-C3N4 materials.

    2.3.3   Phosphorus doping

    Kumar et al. [100] synthesized phosphorus-doped carbon nitride quantum dots (CNPQDs) through solid thermal condensation of urea, citric acid and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate (BMIM-PF6) in a reactor at 200 ℃. The synthesis of carbon nitride doped quantum dots (CNPQDs) is shown in Fig. 8a. In this synthesis process, urea and citric acid generate basic carbonitride skeleton by condensation polymerization, and BMIM-PF6 acts as a phosphorus doping source. Steady state photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of phosphorus doped carbon nitride quantum dots (CNPQDs) and carbon nitride quantum dots (CNQDs) in water is shown in Fig. 8b. 15N and 31P CPMAS NMR spectra of CNPQDs is shown in Fig. 8c. The process of (CNPQDs) modification in titanium dioxide array is shown in Figs. 8d and e.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8.  (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the synthesis of phosphorus doped carbon nitride quantum dots (CNPQDs). (b) Steady state PL spectrum of CNPQDs and carbon nitride quantum dots (CNQDs) in water. Inset showing fluorescence of CNPQDs sample under UV light irradiation. (c) N and P CPMAS NMR spectra of CNPQDs. (d-f) The preparation of CNPQDs decorated square shaped TNTAs. Reproduced with permission [100]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH.
    2.3.4   Halogen doping

    Iodine doping: In this study, Iqbal et al. [101] prepared a nano-mesoporous g-C3N4 doped with iodine and N vacancy simultaneously by a direct one-step method. In particular, the simultaneous heating of glucose and NH4I has shown some interesting phenomena, such as synergistic iodine-doped mesoporous g-C3N4 epidermoid shedding and the introduction of N vacancy due to the release of nitrogen-rich gas. In this work, the synthesized iodine-doped mesoporous g-C3N4 has an excellent photocatalytic hydrogen production performance up to 7819.2 μmolg-1h-1 under simulated solar light, which is nearly 6.5 times higher than the bulk g-C3N4 and other kinds of iodine-doped g-C3N4 photocatalysts. This work presents a simple and feasible way to synthesize high performance metal-free g-C3N4 photocatalyst by changing electronic transition through reasonable band structure construction. The carbon nitride process modified by iodine is shown in Fig. 9.

    Figure 9

    Figure 9.  Schematic of synthesizing N-vacant iodine doped mesoporous g-C3N4 nanosheets. Reproduced with permission [101]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Bromine doping: Lan et al. [102] proposed a bromide doped graphite phase carbon nitride method. Bromine modification can improve the optical, conductance and photocatalytic properties of g-C3N4 while keeping the core structure of Triazine as the main component of the material. Photocatalytic mechanism of CN-Br photocatalyst is shown in Fig. 10. The modification method is generally applicable to several precursors of g-C3N4, including urea, dicyandiamide, ammonium thiocyanate and thiourea. This work also provides a feasible modification way for the rational design and synthesis of g-C3N4-based photocatalyst.

    Figure 10

    Figure 10.  Photocatalytic mechanism of CN-Br photocatalyst. Reproduced with permission from [102]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier.

    The catalytic performance, especially that of visible light, can be improved effectively by element doping. However, it still has some disadvantages that cannot be ignored: for example, the preparation process is complicated, the production cost is increased and industrial production is limited.

    Heterostructure photocatalysts can be divided into two types according to the photoelectron-hole migration mode: A class of heterogeneous junction photocatalysts, dominated by classical carrier transfer, is composed of wide band gap photocatalyst and narrow band gap photocatalyst [103-108]. CB of narrow band gap material has a higher energy level and a wider spectral absorption range of narrow band gap material, which can effectively widen the width of response spectrum of heterojunction structure material. The wide band gap semiconductor has relatively low conduction band energy level, which makes the photoelectrons of the narrow band gap photocatalyst material transferred to the CB of the wide band gap material, thus generating a large number of photoelectrons and significantly improving the photocatalytic activity [109]. The other is heterojunction photocatalytic materials with Z-strategy carrier migration as the main stream, on the condition that the top of a semiconductor's VB is higher than that of the other conductor's CB [110-118]. When carriers pass through the control interface, lower energy photogenic carriers are directly recombined to leave higher energy photogenic carriers, thus achieving higher photocatalytic performance.

    Hao et al. [119] improved the performance of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by using Ni(OH)2 as the operational synergetic catalyst for ultra-fine combination with 2D-CN to form 2D/2D heterojunctions. The preparation process is shown in Fig. 11a. Due to the high mobility of Ni(OH)2 holes and the unique 2D/2D heterogeneous junction of Ni(OH)2/2D-CN, the specific photocatalyst Ni(OH)2/2D-CN accelerates the separation/transport of photocarriers, thus achieving a breakthrough in continuous photocatalytic hydrogen evolution without the use of Pt co-catalyst and sacrificial agent. We can clearly see through TEM images: Ni(OH)2 (Figs. 11b and c), 2D-CN (Fig. 11d) and 0.25 Ni(OH)2/2D-CN nanohybrid (Figs. 11e and f). In this work, 10% triethanolamine was used as sacrificial agent, and the hydrogen evolution rate of Ni(OH)2/2D-CN at 400 nm was 921.4 μmolg-1h-1, and the external quantum efficiency (EQE) was 5.21%. This work provides a new way to explore new photocatalytic materials.

    Figure 11

    Figure 11.  (a) The formation process of Ni(OH)2/2D-CN nanohybrids. (b, c) TEM images of the Ni(OH)2. (d) 2D-CN, (e, f) 0.25 Ni(OH)2/2D-CN nanohybrids and (g) element mappings for C, N, O and Ni. Reproduced with permission [119]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH.

    Up to now, g-C3N4 as a metal-free, visible light responsive photocatalyst, is still a research hotspot in hydrogen production field. In this review, the preparation progress and catalytic effect of g-C3N4-based composites are reviewed from four aspects: adjusting the carbon/nitrogen ratio of materials, synthesizing different morphologies, element doping and constructing heterogeneous structures. Through people's constant exploration, there has been great progress. However, the g-C3N4-based photocatalysts currently used for integral water separation are still far from the optimal level for sustained hydrogen production from water. Using semiconductor photocatalysts to achieve solar-powered water cracking to produce highly efficient hydrogen remains a challenge. We need to develop more effective photocorrosion protection on g-C3N4-based catalysts and construct new and more effective co-catalysts to improve photocatalytic activity and stability. The photocatalytic properties can be improved by modifying CN materials as mentioned above. This review provides reference for further improvement of photocatalyst materials.

    We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51672109, 51802177), the Independent Cultivation Program of Innovation Team of Ji'nan City (No. 2019GXRC011), and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2018BEM019). All the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.


    * Corresponding authors.
    E-mail addresses: sps_zhaog@ujn.edu.cn (G. Zhao), sps_xuxj@ujn.edu.cn (X. Xu).
    1. [1]

      S. Sen, S. Ganguly, A. Das, J. Sen, S. Dey, J. Afr. Earth Sci. 122 (2016) 25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.06.002

    2. [2]

      B.H. Kreps, Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 79 (2020) 695-717. doi: 10.1111/ajes.12336

    3. [3]

      G. Zhao, H.C. Yang, M.Q. Liu, X.J. Xu, Front. Chem. 6 (2018) 551. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00551

    4. [4]

      H.J. Maaß, H.O. Möckel, Chem. Eng. Technol. 43 (2020) 111-118. doi: 10.1002/ceat.201900384

    5. [5]

      Z. Wang, C. Li, K. Domen, Chem. Soc. Rev. 48 (2019) 2109-2125. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00542G

    6. [6]

      P. Yu, L.V. Besteiro, Y. Huang, et al., Adv. Opt. Mater. 7 (2019) 1800995. doi: 10.1002/adom.201800995

    7. [7]

      J.D. Xiao, H.L. Jiang, Acc. Chem. Res. 52 (2019) 356-366. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00521

    8. [8]

      G. Zhao, A. Wang, W. He, Y. Xing, X. Xu, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 6 (2019) 1900062. doi: 10.1002/admi.201900062

    9. [9]

      X. Ling, Y. Xu, S. Wu, et al., Sci. China Chem. 63 (2020) 386-392. doi: 10.1007/s11426-019-9672-8

    10. [10]

      A. Hayat, N. Shaishta, S.K.B. Mane, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 560 (2020) 743-754. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.10.088

    11. [11]

      K.M. Alam, P. Kumar, P. Kar, et al., Nanotechnology 31 (2020) 84001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab4e2c

    12. [12]

      S. Wang, H. Zhao, X. Zhao, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 381 (2020) 122593. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122593

    13. [13]

      Z. Qin, Z. Huang, M. Wang, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 261 (2020) 118211. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118211

    14. [14]

      Z. Liang, G. Ba, H. Li, N. Du, W. Hou, J. Alloys Compd. 815 (2020) 152488. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152488

    15. [15]

      Z. Mo, X. She, Z. Chen, et al., Chemcatchem 12 (2020) 1169-1176. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201901533

    16. [16]

      S.S. Chen, T. Tsuyoshi, D. Kazunari, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 (2017) 17050. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.50

    17. [17]

      F. Raziq, J. He, J. Gan, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 270 (2020) 118870. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118870

    18. [18]

      Q. Liu, C. Zeng, Z. Xie, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 254 (2019) 443-451. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.04.098

    19. [19]

      K. Sielicki, M. Aleksandrzak, E. Mijowska, Appl. Surf. Sci. 508 (2020) 145144. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145144

    20. [20]

      S. Zhao, J. Fang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhou, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7 (2019) 10095-10104. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01544

    21. [21]

      Y. Xin, Y. Huang, K. Lin, Y. Yu, B. Zhang, Sci. Bull. 63 (2018) 601-608. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.03.015

    22. [22]

      L. Kong, J. Yan, S. Liu, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7 (2019) 1389-1398. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05117

    23. [23]

      Y. Wang, J. Mao, X. Meng, et al., Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 1806-1854. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00501

    24. [24]

      Y. Tu, P. Ren, D. Deng, X. Bao, Nano Energy 52 (2018) 494-500. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.062

    25. [25]

      Y. Xia, B. Cheng, J. Fan, J. Yu, G. Liu, Sci. China Mater. 63 (2020) 552-565. doi: 10.1007/s40843-019-1234-x

    26. [26]

      G. Zhao, Y. Cheng, Y. Wu, X. Xu, X. Hao, Small 14 (2018) 1704138. doi: 10.1002/smll.201704138

    27. [27]

      X. Huang, Z. Wu, H. Zheng, W. Dong, G. Wang, Green Chem. 20 (2018) 664-670. doi: 10.1039/C7GC02231J

    28. [28]

      N. Meng, W. Zhou, Y. Yu, Y. Liu, B. Zhang, ACS Catal. 9 (2019) 10983-10989. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b03895

    29. [29]

      W. Yu, T. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 278 (2020) 119342. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119342

    30. [30]

      G. Lu, X. Huang, Y. Li, et al., J. Energy Chem. 43 (2020) 8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.07.014

    31. [31]

      M. Zhou, Z. Chen, P. Yang, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 276 (2020) 118916. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118916

    32. [32]

      W. Ren, J. Cheng, H. Ou, et al., J. Catal. 389 (2020) 636-645. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.07.005

    33. [33]

      Y. Wang, P. Du, H. Pan, et al., Adv. Mater. 31 (2019) 1807540. doi: 10.1002/adma.201807540

    34. [34]

      G. Liu, S. Yan, L. Shi, L. Yao, Front. Chem. 7 (2019) 639. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00639

    35. [35]

      Y. Yang, M. Wu, X. Zhu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 30 (2019) 2065-2088. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.11.001

    36. [36]

      Q. Liu, F. Wang, Y. Jiang, et al., Carbon 170 (2020) 199-212. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.07.080

    37. [37]

      J. Wang, Y. Wang, W. Wang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 383 (2020) 123193. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123193

    38. [38]

      J. Shi, L. Mao, C. Cai, et al., Catal. Sci. Technol. 10 (2020) 5896-5902. doi: 10.1039/D0CY01202E

    39. [39]

      L. Lin, Z. Lin, J. Zhang, et al., Nat. Catal. 3 (2020) 649-655. doi: 10.1038/s41929-020-0476-3

    40. [40]

      Y. Zhu, J. Li, J. Cao, et al., APL Mater. 8 (2020) 41108. doi: 10.1063/1.5143711

    41. [41]

      Y. Fang, X. Fu, X. Wang, ACS Mater. Lett. 2 (2020) 975-980. doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00215

    42. [42]

      R.P. Liang, L.D. Yu, Y.J. Tong, et al., Chem. Commun. 54 (2018) 14001-14004. doi: 10.1039/C8CC08353C

    43. [43]

      Y. Gao, K. Qian, B. Xu, et al., RSC Adv. 10 (2020) 32652-32661. doi: 10.1039/D0RA06226J

    44. [44]

      L. Finegold, L.C. Jesse, Nature 238 (1972) 38-40. doi: 10.1038/238038a0

    45. [45]

      M.G. Walter, L.W. Emily, R.M. James, et al., Chem. Rev. 110 (2010) 6446-6473. doi: 10.1021/cr1002326

    46. [46]

      Q. Liu, L. Wei, Q. Xi, Y. Lei, F. Wang, Chem. Eng. J. 383 (2020) 123792. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123792

    47. [47]

      D.F. Lv, R.F. Shi, Y.W. Chen, et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57 (2018) 12215-12224. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b02596

    48. [48]

      N. Zhang, C. Chen, Y.L. Chen, et al., ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1 (2018) 2016-2023. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b00114

    49. [49]

      S. Sun, S. Liang, Nanoscale 9 (2017) 10544-10578. doi: 10.1039/C7NR03656F

    50. [50]

      Q. Han, N. Chen, J. Zhang, L. Qu, Mater. Horiz. 4 (2017) 832-850. doi: 10.1039/C7MH00379J

    51. [51]

      N. -A. Mohamed, H. Ullah, J. Safaei, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 123 (2019) 9013-9026. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00217

    52. [52]

      L. Jing, D. Wang, Y. Xu, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 566 (2020) 171-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.01.044

    53. [53]

      B. Antil, L. Kumar, K.P. Reddy, C.S. Gopinath, S. Deka, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7 (2019) 9428-9438. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00626

    54. [54]

      B. Antil, R. Ranjan, C.S. Gopinath, S. Deka, J. Mater. Chem. 8 (2020) 13328-13339. doi: 10.1039/D0TA02734K

    55. [55]

      Y. Zheng, Y. Chen, L. Wang, et al., Dalton Trans. 49 (2020) 7598-7604. doi: 10.1039/D0DT00865F

    56. [56]

      B. Yan, Z. Chen, Y. Xu, Chem. Asian J. 15 (2020) 2329-2340. doi: 10.1002/asia.202000253

    57. [57]

      C. Zhao, G. Tan, J. Huang, W. Yang, H. Ren, A. Xia, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 (2015) 23949-23957. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b06501

    58. [58]

      S. Patnaik, S. Martha, K.M. Parida, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 46929-46951. doi: 10.1039/C5RA26702A

    59. [59]

      R. Bhosale, S. Jain, C.P. Vinod, S. Kumar, S. Ogale, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 (2019) 6174-6183. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b22434

    60. [60]

      L. Tang, X. Ouyang, B. Peng, et al., Nanoscale 11 (2019) 12198-12209. doi: 10.1039/C9NR03004B

    61. [61]

      Y. Shen, Q. Han, J. Hu, et al., ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3 (2020) 6561-6572. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.0c00750

    62. [62]

      G. Liao, Y. Gong, L. Zhang, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 12 (2019) 2080-2147. doi: 10.1039/C9EE00717B

    63. [63]

      N. Wang, J. Wang, J. Hu, et al., ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1 (2018) 2866-2873. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b00526

    64. [64]

      L. Lu, X. Xu, K. An, Y. Wang, F. Shi, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6 (2018) 11869-11876. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02153

    65. [65]

      W. Iqbal, B. Yang, X. Zhao, et al., Catal. Sci. Technol. 10 (2020) 549-559. doi: 10.1039/C9CY02111F

    66. [66]

      W. Li, Z. Guo, L. Jiang, et al., Chem. Sci. 11 (2020) 2716-2728. doi: 10.1039/C9SC05060D

    67. [67]

      J. Barrio, L. Lin, X. Wang, M. Shalom, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6 (2018) 519-530. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02807

    68. [68]

      G. Zhuge, W. Zhang, ChemCatChem 11 (2018) 1045-1056.

    69. [69]

      M. Xiao, Z. Wang, M. Lyu, et al., Adv. Mater. 31 (2019) 1801369. doi: 10.1002/adma.201801369

    70. [70]

      W. Liu, Z. Zhang, D. Zhang, et al., RSC Adv. 10 (2020) 28848-28855. doi: 10.1039/D0RA03802D

    71. [71]

      C. Yao, A. Yuan, Z. Wang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. 7 (2019) 13071-13079. doi: 10.1039/C9TA03253C

    72. [72]

      C. Yao, R. Wang, Z. Wang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. 7 (2019) 27547-27559. doi: 10.1039/C9TA09201C

    73. [73]

      Z. Wang, H. Yu, Y. Xiao, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 394 (2020) 12501.

    74. [74]

      P. Niu, L. Zhang, G. Liu, H.M. Cheng, Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 (2012) 4763-4770. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201200922

    75. [75]

      X. Zhang, X. Xie, H. Wang, J. Zhang, B. Pan, Y. Xie, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 18-21. doi: 10.1021/ja308249k

    76. [76]

      S. Yang, Y. Gong, J. Zhang, et al., Adv. Mater. 25 (2013) 2452-2456. doi: 10.1002/adma.201204453

    77. [77]

      J. Xu, L. Zhang, R. Shi, Y. Zhu, J. Mater. Chem. 1 (2013) 14766-14772. doi: 10.1039/c3ta13188b

    78. [78]

      F. Cheng, H. Wang, X. Dong, Chem. Commun. 51 (2015) 7176-7179. doi: 10.1039/C5CC01035G

    79. [79]

      F. Cheng, J. Yan, C. Zhou, et al., J. Colloid Interfaces Sci. 468 (2016) 103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.01.044

    80. [80]

      J. Yan, X. Han, J. Qian, et al., J. Mater. Sci. 52 (2017) 13091-13102. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1419-5

    81. [81]

      J. Qian, J. Yan, C. Shen, et al., J. Mater. Sci. 53 (2018) 12103-12114. doi: 10.1007/s10853-018-2509-8

    82. [82]

      S. Han, L. Yu, H. Zhang, et al., ChemCatChem 11 (2019) 6203-6207. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201901399

    83. [83]

      B. Zhang, T.J. Zhao, H.H. Wang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 (2019) 34922-34929. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b10123

    84. [84]

      H. Huang, K. Xiao, N. Tian, et al., J. Mater. Chem. 5 (2017) 17452-17463. doi: 10.1039/C7TA04639A

    85. [85]

      J. Barrio, M. Shalom, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (2018) 39688-39694. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b13873

    86. [86]

      N.N. Vu, S. Kaliaguine, T.O. Do, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8 (2020) 853-863. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05083

    87. [87]

      W. Wang, J.C. Yu, Z. Shen, D.K.L. Chan, T. Gu, Chem. Commun. 50 (2014) 10148-10150. doi: 10.1039/C4CC02543A

    88. [88]

      K. Ding, L. Wen, M. Huang, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 (2016) 19217-19226. doi: 10.1039/C6CP02169G

    89. [89]

      M.Z. Rahman, K. Davey, S.Z. Qiao, J. Mater. Chem. 6 (2018) 1305-1322. doi: 10.1039/C7TA10404A

    90. [90]

      F. Su, C. Xu, Y. Yu, W. Zhang, ChemCatChem 8 (2016) 3527-3535. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201600928

    91. [91]

      H. Zhang, X. Han, H. Yu, Y. Zou, X. Dong, Sep. Purif. Technol. 226 (2019) 128-137. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.066

    92. [92]

      W. Che, W. Cheng, T. Yao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 3021-3026. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11878

    93. [93]

      K. Hu, M. Yao, Z. Yang, et al., Nanoscale 12 (2020) 12300-12307. doi: 10.1039/D0NR01542C

    94. [94]

      G. Xu, Z. Wang, Q. Liu, et al., ChemistrySelect 4 (2019) 13064-13070. doi: 10.1002/slct.201903347

    95. [95]

      Q. Wan, F. Wei, Z. Ma, M. Anpo, S. Lin, Adv. Theory Simul. 2 (2019) 1800174. doi: 10.1002/adts.201800174

    96. [96]

      F. Wei, Y. Liu, H. Zhao, et al., Nanoscale 10 (2018) 4515-4522. doi: 10.1039/C7NR09660G

    97. [97]

      G. Zhang, C. He, P. Zhang, H. Mi, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 283 (2020) 119636.

    98. [98]

      S. Thaweesak, S. Wang, M. Lyu, et al., Dalton Trans. 46 (2017) 10714-10720. doi: 10.1039/C7DT00933J

    99. [99]

      F. He, S. Wang, H. Zhao, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 485 (2019) 70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.164

    100. [100]

      P. Kumar, P. Kar, A.P. Manuel, et al., Adv. Opt. Mater. 8 (2020) 1901275. doi: 10.1002/adom.201901275

    101. [101]

      W. Iqbal, B. Yang, X. Zhao, et al., Catal. Sci. Technol. 10 (2020) 549-559. doi: 10.1039/C9CY02111F

    102. [102]

      Z. -A. Lan, G. Zhang, X. Wang, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 192 (2016) 116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.062

    103. [103]

      N. Lu, X. Yan, H. Kobayashi, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 279 (2020) 119378. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119378

    104. [104]

      S. Wang, L. Chen, X. Zhao, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 278 (2020) 119312. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119312

    105. [105]

      H. Jiang, C. Zang, Y. Zhang, et al., Catal. Sci. Technol. 10 (2020) 5964-5972. doi: 10.1039/D0CY00656D

    106. [106]

      L. Chen, Y. Wang, C. Wu, et al., Nanoscale 12 (2020) 13484-13490. doi: 10.1039/D0NR02556A

    107. [107]

      E.D. Koutsouroubi, I. Vamvasakis, I.T. Papadas, et al., ChemPlusChem 85 (2020) 1366-1366. doi: 10.1002/cplu.202000286

    108. [108]

      L. Liu, X. Song, X. Kong, Q. Duan, E. Zhu, RSC Adv. 10 (2020) 9116-9125. doi: 10.1039/D0RA00960A

    109. [109]

      Y. Tian, H. Wang, H. Li, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 8 (2020) 4647-4676. doi: 10.1039/C9TA13487E

    110. [110]

      C. Jiang, H. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Ji, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 277 (2020) 119235. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119235

    111. [111]

      H. Shen, M. Wang, X. Zhang, et al., Fuel 280 (2020) 118618. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118618

    112. [112]

      H. Zhang, G. Tang, X. Wan, J. Xu, H. Tang, Appl. Surf. Sci. 530 (2020) 147234. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147234

    113. [113]

      M. Jourshabani, B.K. Lee, Z. Shariatinia, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 276 (2020) 119157. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119157

    114. [114]

      H. Salari, Mater. Res. Bull. 131 (2020) 110979. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2020.110979

    115. [115]

      F. Yang, Q. Zhang, J. Zhang, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 278 (2020) 119290. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119290

    116. [116]

      Z. Zhao, B. Shen, Z. Hu, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 400 (2020) 123236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123236

    117. [117]

      G. Di, Z. Zhu, H. Zhang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 401 (2020) 126061. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126061

    118. [118]

      G. Zhao, S. Hao, J. Guo, et al., J. Catal. 42 (2021) 501-509.

    119. [119]

      Q. Hao, Y. Song, Z. Mo, et al., Sol. RRL 4 (2020) 1900538. doi: 10.1002/solr.201900538

  • Figure 1  Graphic representation of the proposed carbon nitride photoactive material from the supramolecular assembly and the corresponding energy-band structure. Reproduced with permission [67]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.

    Figure 2  (a) Synthesis process of nitrogen-rich CN and (b) nitrogen-deficient CN. Reproduced with permission [68]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH.

    Figure 3  (a) SEM image of carbon nitride aerogel. (b) TEM image of carbon nitride aerogel. (c) STEM image of carbon nitride aerogel acquired in the HAADF mode. (d) The self-supported entangled nanolayers of the carbon nitride aerogel. (e) Typical time course of H2 production of carbon nitride aerogel and bulk carbon nitride under visible-light irradiation (λ > 420 nm). (f) Hydrogen evolution rate comparison of carbon nitride aerogel and control samples. (g) AQY values under different monochromatic light irradiation and UV-vis spectra of carbon nitride aerogel. (h) AQY comparison of carbon nitride aerogel. Reproduced with permission [83]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.

    Figure 4  (a) The preparation of porous g-C3N4 nanosheet. (b) Photocatalytic H2 production curves. (c) H2 production rate of CN with different thiourea dosage under visible light. Reproduced with permission [84]. Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 5  (a) The preparation of carbon nitride nanowires. (b) Images of a 4 cm free-standing g-C3N4 filaments. (c) In situ heating SEM images at different temperatures. Reproduced with permission [85]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.

    Figure 6  (a) H2 production rate of CN and CN fragments samples and (b) H2 production of CN fragments for three cycles. (c) The preparation of CN nanofragments. Reproduced with permission [86]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.

    Figure 7  The preparation of oxygen-doped g-C3N4 nanospheres. Reproduced with permission [96]. Copyright 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 8  (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the synthesis of phosphorus doped carbon nitride quantum dots (CNPQDs). (b) Steady state PL spectrum of CNPQDs and carbon nitride quantum dots (CNQDs) in water. Inset showing fluorescence of CNPQDs sample under UV light irradiation. (c) N and P CPMAS NMR spectra of CNPQDs. (d-f) The preparation of CNPQDs decorated square shaped TNTAs. Reproduced with permission [100]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH.

    Figure 9  Schematic of synthesizing N-vacant iodine doped mesoporous g-C3N4 nanosheets. Reproduced with permission [101]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 10  Photocatalytic mechanism of CN-Br photocatalyst. Reproduced with permission from [102]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier.

    Figure 11  (a) The formation process of Ni(OH)2/2D-CN nanohybrids. (b, c) TEM images of the Ni(OH)2. (d) 2D-CN, (e, f) 0.25 Ni(OH)2/2D-CN nanohybrids and (g) element mappings for C, N, O and Ni. Reproduced with permission [119]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH.

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  45
  • 文章访问数:  1357
  • HTML全文浏览量:  203
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2021-01-15
  • 收稿日期:  2020-10-20
  • 接受日期:  2020-11-02
  • 修回日期:  2020-10-31
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-11-04
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章